No Cover Image

Journal article 1021 views 176 downloads

Seeking a deeper level of responsibility for inclusive (eco)tourism duty and the pinnacle of practice

David A. Fennell, Brian Garrod Orcid Logo

Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Volume: 30 (2022), Issue: 6, Pages: 1 - 20

Swansea University Author: Brian Garrod Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1080/09669582.2021.1951278

Abstract

As a form of tourism that aims to be sustainable and, in broader terms, responsible and ethical, ecotourism occupies a peak position in terms of people’s understanding of sustainable tourism. The purpose of this paper is to articulate how responsibility can be actuated through a deeper consideration...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Sustainable Tourism
ISSN: 0966-9582 1747-7646
Published: Oxford Informa UK Limited 2021
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa57248
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2021-06-30T11:15:55Z
last_indexed 2022-05-13T03:28:27Z
id cronfa57248
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-05-12T16:13:10.9417543</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>57248</id><entry>2021-06-30</entry><title>Seeking a deeper level of responsibility for inclusive (eco)tourism duty and the pinnacle of practice</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>4f81981d78ed3082b232463da24d1bb9</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-5468-6816</ORCID><firstname>Brian</firstname><surname>Garrod</surname><name>Brian Garrod</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2021-06-30</date><deptcode>BBU</deptcode><abstract>As a form of tourism that aims to be sustainable and, in broader terms, responsible and ethical, ecotourism occupies a peak position in terms of people&#x2019;s understanding of sustainable tourism. The purpose of this paper is to articulate how responsibility can be actuated through a deeper consideration of duty (good as intrinsic) and strategic (good for business) perspectives. In pursuit of this overall aim, the paper investigates a sample of Ecotourism Australia (EA) certified company websites to examine inclusivity barriers based on the social model of disability: physical, attitudinal, and informational. The choice of Australia is based on the observation that ecotourism providers in this region are often cited as highly advanced in terms of policies and practices. Results suggest that there is only limited statistical support for the hypothesis that the &#x2018;leading&#x2019; ecotourism operators (with advanced EA certification) in Australia pay more attention to disability issues than those in the &#x2018;following&#x2019; group (with lower categories of EA certification). The paper concludes by suggesting that the responsibility agenda is most likely to move forward by providers adopting ways of "thinking" and "doing" that emphasise duty and justice instead of following accepted business practice.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Sustainable Tourism</journal><volume>30 (2022)</volume><journalNumber>6</journalNumber><paginationStart>1</paginationStart><paginationEnd>20</paginationEnd><publisher>Informa UK Limited</publisher><placeOfPublication>Oxford</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0966-9582</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1747-7646</issnElectronic><keywords>Accessibility, disability, ecotourism, responsible tourism, Ecotourism Australia</keywords><publishedDay>27</publishedDay><publishedMonth>7</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-07-27</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/09669582.2021.1951278</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Business</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>BBU</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>None</funders><lastEdited>2022-05-12T16:13:10.9417543</lastEdited><Created>2021-06-30T12:11:39.7216227</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Business Management</level></path><authors><author><firstname>David A.</firstname><surname>Fennell</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Brian</firstname><surname>Garrod</surname><orcid>0000-0002-5468-6816</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>57248__20390__af1503565d8e42dfb867afe31341a151.pdf</filename><originalFilename>57248.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2021-07-12T15:58:55.7282074</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>398207</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2023-01-27T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-05-12T16:13:10.9417543 v2 57248 2021-06-30 Seeking a deeper level of responsibility for inclusive (eco)tourism duty and the pinnacle of practice 4f81981d78ed3082b232463da24d1bb9 0000-0002-5468-6816 Brian Garrod Brian Garrod true false 2021-06-30 BBU As a form of tourism that aims to be sustainable and, in broader terms, responsible and ethical, ecotourism occupies a peak position in terms of people’s understanding of sustainable tourism. The purpose of this paper is to articulate how responsibility can be actuated through a deeper consideration of duty (good as intrinsic) and strategic (good for business) perspectives. In pursuit of this overall aim, the paper investigates a sample of Ecotourism Australia (EA) certified company websites to examine inclusivity barriers based on the social model of disability: physical, attitudinal, and informational. The choice of Australia is based on the observation that ecotourism providers in this region are often cited as highly advanced in terms of policies and practices. Results suggest that there is only limited statistical support for the hypothesis that the ‘leading’ ecotourism operators (with advanced EA certification) in Australia pay more attention to disability issues than those in the ‘following’ group (with lower categories of EA certification). The paper concludes by suggesting that the responsibility agenda is most likely to move forward by providers adopting ways of "thinking" and "doing" that emphasise duty and justice instead of following accepted business practice. Journal Article Journal of Sustainable Tourism 30 (2022) 6 1 20 Informa UK Limited Oxford 0966-9582 1747-7646 Accessibility, disability, ecotourism, responsible tourism, Ecotourism Australia 27 7 2021 2021-07-27 10.1080/09669582.2021.1951278 COLLEGE NANME Business COLLEGE CODE BBU Swansea University None 2022-05-12T16:13:10.9417543 2021-06-30T12:11:39.7216227 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Business Management David A. Fennell 1 Brian Garrod 0000-0002-5468-6816 2 57248__20390__af1503565d8e42dfb867afe31341a151.pdf 57248.pdf 2021-07-12T15:58:55.7282074 Output 398207 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2023-01-27T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Seeking a deeper level of responsibility for inclusive (eco)tourism duty and the pinnacle of practice
spellingShingle Seeking a deeper level of responsibility for inclusive (eco)tourism duty and the pinnacle of practice
Brian Garrod
title_short Seeking a deeper level of responsibility for inclusive (eco)tourism duty and the pinnacle of practice
title_full Seeking a deeper level of responsibility for inclusive (eco)tourism duty and the pinnacle of practice
title_fullStr Seeking a deeper level of responsibility for inclusive (eco)tourism duty and the pinnacle of practice
title_full_unstemmed Seeking a deeper level of responsibility for inclusive (eco)tourism duty and the pinnacle of practice
title_sort Seeking a deeper level of responsibility for inclusive (eco)tourism duty and the pinnacle of practice
author_id_str_mv 4f81981d78ed3082b232463da24d1bb9
author_id_fullname_str_mv 4f81981d78ed3082b232463da24d1bb9_***_Brian Garrod
author Brian Garrod
author2 David A. Fennell
Brian Garrod
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Sustainable Tourism
container_volume 30 (2022)
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1
publishDate 2021
institution Swansea University
issn 0966-9582
1747-7646
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09669582.2021.1951278
publisher Informa UK Limited
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Management - Business Management{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Business Management
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description As a form of tourism that aims to be sustainable and, in broader terms, responsible and ethical, ecotourism occupies a peak position in terms of people’s understanding of sustainable tourism. The purpose of this paper is to articulate how responsibility can be actuated through a deeper consideration of duty (good as intrinsic) and strategic (good for business) perspectives. In pursuit of this overall aim, the paper investigates a sample of Ecotourism Australia (EA) certified company websites to examine inclusivity barriers based on the social model of disability: physical, attitudinal, and informational. The choice of Australia is based on the observation that ecotourism providers in this region are often cited as highly advanced in terms of policies and practices. Results suggest that there is only limited statistical support for the hypothesis that the ‘leading’ ecotourism operators (with advanced EA certification) in Australia pay more attention to disability issues than those in the ‘following’ group (with lower categories of EA certification). The paper concludes by suggesting that the responsibility agenda is most likely to move forward by providers adopting ways of "thinking" and "doing" that emphasise duty and justice instead of following accepted business practice.
published_date 2021-07-27T04:12:50Z
_version_ 1763753874518179840
score 11.017797

Similar Items