Journal article 424 views 100 downloads
On the meaning(s) of norms: Ambiguity and global governance in a post-hegemonic world
Review of International Studies, Volume: 47, Issue: 4, Pages: 508 - 527
Swansea University Author:
Dennis Schmidt
-
PDF | Version of Record
© The Author(s), 2021. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence
Download (268.44KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1017/s0260210521000371
Abstract
This article offers a new conceptualisation of the meaning of norms in world politics. It starts from the observation that existing norm scholarship in International Relations has underestimated the role of ambiguity in the constitution of norm meaning. To address this shortcoming, we advance a conc...
Published in: | Review of International Studies |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0260-2105 1469-9044 |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
2021
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa57315 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2021-07-12T16:31:36Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2021-11-30T04:15:20Z |
id |
cronfa57315 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2021-11-29T17:04:32.1312348</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>57315</id><entry>2021-07-12</entry><title>On the meaning(s) of norms: Ambiguity and global governance in a post-hegemonic world</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>34ba44cca786a2642ddd4d447ff8c5fe</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-2515-5733</ORCID><firstname>Dennis</firstname><surname>Schmidt</surname><name>Dennis Schmidt</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2021-07-12</date><deptcode>APC</deptcode><abstract>This article offers a new conceptualisation of the meaning of norms in world politics. It starts from the observation that existing norm scholarship in International Relations has underestimated the role of ambiguity in the constitution of norm meaning. To address this shortcoming, we advance a conceptualisation that sees norm polysemy – the empirically observable plurality of norm meanings-in-use – as resulting from the enactment of inherently ambiguous norms in different contexts. By foregrounding norm ambiguity, this view offers a radically non-essentialist understanding of norm meaning, one that eschews any attempt to salvage final or ‘true’ meanings behind the polysemy of norms. Using empirical illustrations from different fields of contemporary global governance, we identify four mechanisms through which actors practically cope with the multiplicity of norm meanings that arises from norm ambiguity (deliberation, adjudication, uni- or multilateral fixation attempts, and ad hoc enactment) and outline their varying effects on the legitimacy and effectiveness of global governance. Based on this discussion, the article points to the normative implications of a radically non-essentialist conception of norms and suggests harnessing the positive potential of norm ambiguity as an ethically desirable condition that promotes human diversity and the plurality of global life.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Review of International Studies</journal><volume>47</volume><journalNumber>4</journalNumber><paginationStart>508</paginationStart><paginationEnd>527</paginationEnd><publisher>Cambridge University Press (CUP)</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0260-2105</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1469-9044</issnElectronic><keywords>International Norms; Norm Meaning; Norm Contestation; Polysemy; Ethics</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>10</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-10-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1017/s0260210521000371</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>APC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><lastEdited>2021-11-29T17:04:32.1312348</lastEdited><Created>2021-07-12T17:28:10.5289486</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Thomas</firstname><surname>Linsenmaier</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Dennis</firstname><surname>Schmidt</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2515-5733</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Kilian</firstname><surname>Spandler</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>57315__20391__e9985f5645e043b5aff0ad3787710d66.pdf</filename><originalFilename>on-the-meanings-of-norms-ambiguity-and-global-governance-in-a-post-hegemonic-world.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2021-07-12T17:30:37.8311588</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>274887</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© The Author(s), 2021. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2021-11-29T17:04:32.1312348 v2 57315 2021-07-12 On the meaning(s) of norms: Ambiguity and global governance in a post-hegemonic world 34ba44cca786a2642ddd4d447ff8c5fe 0000-0002-2515-5733 Dennis Schmidt Dennis Schmidt true false 2021-07-12 APC This article offers a new conceptualisation of the meaning of norms in world politics. It starts from the observation that existing norm scholarship in International Relations has underestimated the role of ambiguity in the constitution of norm meaning. To address this shortcoming, we advance a conceptualisation that sees norm polysemy – the empirically observable plurality of norm meanings-in-use – as resulting from the enactment of inherently ambiguous norms in different contexts. By foregrounding norm ambiguity, this view offers a radically non-essentialist understanding of norm meaning, one that eschews any attempt to salvage final or ‘true’ meanings behind the polysemy of norms. Using empirical illustrations from different fields of contemporary global governance, we identify four mechanisms through which actors practically cope with the multiplicity of norm meanings that arises from norm ambiguity (deliberation, adjudication, uni- or multilateral fixation attempts, and ad hoc enactment) and outline their varying effects on the legitimacy and effectiveness of global governance. Based on this discussion, the article points to the normative implications of a radically non-essentialist conception of norms and suggests harnessing the positive potential of norm ambiguity as an ethically desirable condition that promotes human diversity and the plurality of global life. Journal Article Review of International Studies 47 4 508 527 Cambridge University Press (CUP) 0260-2105 1469-9044 International Norms; Norm Meaning; Norm Contestation; Polysemy; Ethics 1 10 2021 2021-10-01 10.1017/s0260210521000371 COLLEGE NANME Politics, Philosophy and International Relations COLLEGE CODE APC Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee 2021-11-29T17:04:32.1312348 2021-07-12T17:28:10.5289486 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Thomas Linsenmaier 1 Dennis Schmidt 0000-0002-2515-5733 2 Kilian Spandler 3 57315__20391__e9985f5645e043b5aff0ad3787710d66.pdf on-the-meanings-of-norms-ambiguity-and-global-governance-in-a-post-hegemonic-world.pdf 2021-07-12T17:30:37.8311588 Output 274887 application/pdf Version of Record true © The Author(s), 2021. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
On the meaning(s) of norms: Ambiguity and global governance in a post-hegemonic world |
spellingShingle |
On the meaning(s) of norms: Ambiguity and global governance in a post-hegemonic world Dennis Schmidt |
title_short |
On the meaning(s) of norms: Ambiguity and global governance in a post-hegemonic world |
title_full |
On the meaning(s) of norms: Ambiguity and global governance in a post-hegemonic world |
title_fullStr |
On the meaning(s) of norms: Ambiguity and global governance in a post-hegemonic world |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the meaning(s) of norms: Ambiguity and global governance in a post-hegemonic world |
title_sort |
On the meaning(s) of norms: Ambiguity and global governance in a post-hegemonic world |
author_id_str_mv |
34ba44cca786a2642ddd4d447ff8c5fe |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
34ba44cca786a2642ddd4d447ff8c5fe_***_Dennis Schmidt |
author |
Dennis Schmidt |
author2 |
Thomas Linsenmaier Dennis Schmidt Kilian Spandler |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Review of International Studies |
container_volume |
47 |
container_issue |
4 |
container_start_page |
508 |
publishDate |
2021 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0260-2105 1469-9044 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1017/s0260210521000371 |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
This article offers a new conceptualisation of the meaning of norms in world politics. It starts from the observation that existing norm scholarship in International Relations has underestimated the role of ambiguity in the constitution of norm meaning. To address this shortcoming, we advance a conceptualisation that sees norm polysemy – the empirically observable plurality of norm meanings-in-use – as resulting from the enactment of inherently ambiguous norms in different contexts. By foregrounding norm ambiguity, this view offers a radically non-essentialist understanding of norm meaning, one that eschews any attempt to salvage final or ‘true’ meanings behind the polysemy of norms. Using empirical illustrations from different fields of contemporary global governance, we identify four mechanisms through which actors practically cope with the multiplicity of norm meanings that arises from norm ambiguity (deliberation, adjudication, uni- or multilateral fixation attempts, and ad hoc enactment) and outline their varying effects on the legitimacy and effectiveness of global governance. Based on this discussion, the article points to the normative implications of a radically non-essentialist conception of norms and suggests harnessing the positive potential of norm ambiguity as an ethically desirable condition that promotes human diversity and the plurality of global life. |
published_date |
2021-10-01T04:12:58Z |
_version_ |
1763753882513571840 |
score |
11.016794 |