No Cover Image

Journal article 778 views

The British Nuclear Experience: The Role of Beliefs, Culture, and Status (Part Two)

Kris Stoddart Orcid Logo, John Baylis

Diplomacy & Statecraft, Volume: 23, Issue: 3, Pages: 493 - 516

Swansea University Author: Kris Stoddart Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1080/09592296.2012.706537

Abstract

Part One of this article, which appeared in the last edition of Diplomacy and Statecraft, argued that the origins and early development of British nuclear weapons was largely driven by the particular ideas and beliefs of a relatively small political, scientific, and military elite. It is also argued...

Full description

Published in: Diplomacy & Statecraft
ISSN: 0959-2296 1557-301X
Published: Informa UK Limited 2012
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa57344
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2021-07-15T13:42:19Z
last_indexed 2021-07-21T03:21:36Z
id cronfa57344
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2021-07-20T12:08:11.1748888</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>57344</id><entry>2021-07-15</entry><title>The British Nuclear Experience: The Role of Beliefs, Culture, and Status (Part Two)</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>b794dd4728d670a0bc8584c634b74426</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-4996-6482</ORCID><firstname>Kris</firstname><surname>Stoddart</surname><name>Kris Stoddart</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2021-07-15</date><deptcode>CSSP</deptcode><abstract>Part One of this article, which appeared in the last edition of Diplomacy and Statecraft, argued that the origins and early development of British nuclear weapons was largely driven by the particular ideas and beliefs of a relatively small political, scientific, and military elite. It is also argued that these beliefs, which developed into a &#x201C;deterrence state of mind&#x201D; amongst the elite, derived in part from a traditional strategic culture that emphasised the importance of producing the most sophisticated weapons of the day to protect Britain's diplomatic and security interests in a largely anarchic international system. Part Two argues that these ideational factors, based on a &#x201C;realist&#x201D; perspective of international security held by Britain's political-military leadership, have remained of crucial importance through to the present day.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Diplomacy &amp; Statecraft</journal><volume>23</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart>493</paginationStart><paginationEnd>516</paginationEnd><publisher>Informa UK Limited</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0959-2296</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1557-301X</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2012</publishedYear><publishedDate>2012-09-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/09592296.2012.706537</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CSSP</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2021-07-20T12:08:11.1748888</lastEdited><Created>2021-07-15T13:22:12.9519350</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Kris</firstname><surname>Stoddart</surname><orcid>0000-0003-4996-6482</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>John</firstname><surname>Baylis</surname><order>2</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2021-07-20T12:08:11.1748888 v2 57344 2021-07-15 The British Nuclear Experience: The Role of Beliefs, Culture, and Status (Part Two) b794dd4728d670a0bc8584c634b74426 0000-0003-4996-6482 Kris Stoddart Kris Stoddart true false 2021-07-15 CSSP Part One of this article, which appeared in the last edition of Diplomacy and Statecraft, argued that the origins and early development of British nuclear weapons was largely driven by the particular ideas and beliefs of a relatively small political, scientific, and military elite. It is also argued that these beliefs, which developed into a “deterrence state of mind” amongst the elite, derived in part from a traditional strategic culture that emphasised the importance of producing the most sophisticated weapons of the day to protect Britain's diplomatic and security interests in a largely anarchic international system. Part Two argues that these ideational factors, based on a “realist” perspective of international security held by Britain's political-military leadership, have remained of crucial importance through to the present day. Journal Article Diplomacy & Statecraft 23 3 493 516 Informa UK Limited 0959-2296 1557-301X 1 9 2012 2012-09-01 10.1080/09592296.2012.706537 COLLEGE NANME Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy COLLEGE CODE CSSP Swansea University 2021-07-20T12:08:11.1748888 2021-07-15T13:22:12.9519350 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy Kris Stoddart 0000-0003-4996-6482 1 John Baylis 2
title The British Nuclear Experience: The Role of Beliefs, Culture, and Status (Part Two)
spellingShingle The British Nuclear Experience: The Role of Beliefs, Culture, and Status (Part Two)
Kris Stoddart
title_short The British Nuclear Experience: The Role of Beliefs, Culture, and Status (Part Two)
title_full The British Nuclear Experience: The Role of Beliefs, Culture, and Status (Part Two)
title_fullStr The British Nuclear Experience: The Role of Beliefs, Culture, and Status (Part Two)
title_full_unstemmed The British Nuclear Experience: The Role of Beliefs, Culture, and Status (Part Two)
title_sort The British Nuclear Experience: The Role of Beliefs, Culture, and Status (Part Two)
author_id_str_mv b794dd4728d670a0bc8584c634b74426
author_id_fullname_str_mv b794dd4728d670a0bc8584c634b74426_***_Kris Stoddart
author Kris Stoddart
author2 Kris Stoddart
John Baylis
format Journal article
container_title Diplomacy & Statecraft
container_volume 23
container_issue 3
container_start_page 493
publishDate 2012
institution Swansea University
issn 0959-2296
1557-301X
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09592296.2012.706537
publisher Informa UK Limited
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Part One of this article, which appeared in the last edition of Diplomacy and Statecraft, argued that the origins and early development of British nuclear weapons was largely driven by the particular ideas and beliefs of a relatively small political, scientific, and military elite. It is also argued that these beliefs, which developed into a “deterrence state of mind” amongst the elite, derived in part from a traditional strategic culture that emphasised the importance of producing the most sophisticated weapons of the day to protect Britain's diplomatic and security interests in a largely anarchic international system. Part Two argues that these ideational factors, based on a “realist” perspective of international security held by Britain's political-military leadership, have remained of crucial importance through to the present day.
published_date 2012-09-01T04:13:01Z
_version_ 1763753885729554432
score 11.016258

Similar Items