No Cover Image

Journal article 526 views 101 downloads

Individual differences in proactive interference in rats (Rattus Norvegicus)

Elias Tsakanikos, Phil Reed Orcid Logo

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Volume: 29, Issue: 1, Pages: 203 - 211

Swansea University Author: Phil Reed Orcid Logo

  • 57681.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    Copyright: The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

    Download (634.37KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.3758/s13423-021-01998-7

Abstract

Individual differences in behaviors are seen across many species, and investigations have focused on traits linked to aggression, risk taking, emotionality, coping styles, and differences in cognitive systems. The current study investigated whether there were individual differences in proactive inte...

Full description

Published in: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
ISSN: 1069-9384 1531-5320
Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2022
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa57681
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2021-08-24T01:28:25Z
last_indexed 2022-04-06T03:19:23Z
id cronfa57681
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-04-05T12:55:30.4154171</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>57681</id><entry>2021-08-24</entry><title>Individual differences in proactive interference in rats (Rattus Norvegicus)</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>100599ab189b514fdf99f9b4cb477a83</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-8157-0747</ORCID><firstname>Phil</firstname><surname>Reed</surname><name>Phil Reed</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2021-08-24</date><deptcode>HPS</deptcode><abstract>Individual differences in behaviors are seen across many species, and investigations have focused on traits linked to aggression, risk taking, emotionality, coping styles, and differences in cognitive systems. The current study investigated whether there were individual differences in proactive interference tasks in rats (Rattus Norvegicus), and tested hypotheses suggesting that these tasks should load onto a single factor and there should be clusters of rats who perform well or poorly on these tasks. The performance of 39 rats was tested across three learning tasks that all involved disengagement from an irrelevant previously learned stimulus to a relevant stimulus: latent inhibition (LI), partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE), and reversal learning (RL). An exploratory factor analysis revealed the existence of one factor underlying performance. A cluster analysis revealed the existence of sets of rats displaying either weak LI and strong PREE and RL effects, or vice versa. These findings suggest that proactive interference may be based on a single underlying psychological system in rats.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Psychonomic Bulletin &amp;amp; Review</journal><volume>29</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>203</paginationStart><paginationEnd>211</paginationEnd><publisher>Springer Science and Business Media LLC</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1069-9384</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1531-5320</issnElectronic><keywords>Proactive interference; Behavioral types; Individual differences; Latent inhibition</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>2</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2022</publishedYear><publishedDate>2022-02-01</publishedDate><doi>10.3758/s13423-021-01998-7</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Not Required</apcterm><lastEdited>2022-04-05T12:55:30.4154171</lastEdited><Created>2021-08-24T02:06:12.5061637</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Elias</firstname><surname>Tsakanikos</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Phil</firstname><surname>Reed</surname><orcid>0000-0002-8157-0747</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>57681__22139__0ac5fe97adbf43a587e352b111fbb424.pdf</filename><originalFilename>57681.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-01-13T13:02:42.7625560</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>649596</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>Copyright: The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-04-05T12:55:30.4154171 v2 57681 2021-08-24 Individual differences in proactive interference in rats (Rattus Norvegicus) 100599ab189b514fdf99f9b4cb477a83 0000-0002-8157-0747 Phil Reed Phil Reed true false 2021-08-24 HPS Individual differences in behaviors are seen across many species, and investigations have focused on traits linked to aggression, risk taking, emotionality, coping styles, and differences in cognitive systems. The current study investigated whether there were individual differences in proactive interference tasks in rats (Rattus Norvegicus), and tested hypotheses suggesting that these tasks should load onto a single factor and there should be clusters of rats who perform well or poorly on these tasks. The performance of 39 rats was tested across three learning tasks that all involved disengagement from an irrelevant previously learned stimulus to a relevant stimulus: latent inhibition (LI), partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE), and reversal learning (RL). An exploratory factor analysis revealed the existence of one factor underlying performance. A cluster analysis revealed the existence of sets of rats displaying either weak LI and strong PREE and RL effects, or vice versa. These findings suggest that proactive interference may be based on a single underlying psychological system in rats. Journal Article Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review 29 1 203 211 Springer Science and Business Media LLC 1069-9384 1531-5320 Proactive interference; Behavioral types; Individual differences; Latent inhibition 1 2 2022 2022-02-01 10.3758/s13423-021-01998-7 COLLEGE NANME Psychology COLLEGE CODE HPS Swansea University Not Required 2022-04-05T12:55:30.4154171 2021-08-24T02:06:12.5061637 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Elias Tsakanikos 1 Phil Reed 0000-0002-8157-0747 2 57681__22139__0ac5fe97adbf43a587e352b111fbb424.pdf 57681.pdf 2022-01-13T13:02:42.7625560 Output 649596 application/pdf Version of Record true Copyright: The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Individual differences in proactive interference in rats (Rattus Norvegicus)
spellingShingle Individual differences in proactive interference in rats (Rattus Norvegicus)
Phil Reed
title_short Individual differences in proactive interference in rats (Rattus Norvegicus)
title_full Individual differences in proactive interference in rats (Rattus Norvegicus)
title_fullStr Individual differences in proactive interference in rats (Rattus Norvegicus)
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in proactive interference in rats (Rattus Norvegicus)
title_sort Individual differences in proactive interference in rats (Rattus Norvegicus)
author_id_str_mv 100599ab189b514fdf99f9b4cb477a83
author_id_fullname_str_mv 100599ab189b514fdf99f9b4cb477a83_***_Phil Reed
author Phil Reed
author2 Elias Tsakanikos
Phil Reed
format Journal article
container_title Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review
container_volume 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 203
publishDate 2022
institution Swansea University
issn 1069-9384
1531-5320
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13423-021-01998-7
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Individual differences in behaviors are seen across many species, and investigations have focused on traits linked to aggression, risk taking, emotionality, coping styles, and differences in cognitive systems. The current study investigated whether there were individual differences in proactive interference tasks in rats (Rattus Norvegicus), and tested hypotheses suggesting that these tasks should load onto a single factor and there should be clusters of rats who perform well or poorly on these tasks. The performance of 39 rats was tested across three learning tasks that all involved disengagement from an irrelevant previously learned stimulus to a relevant stimulus: latent inhibition (LI), partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE), and reversal learning (RL). An exploratory factor analysis revealed the existence of one factor underlying performance. A cluster analysis revealed the existence of sets of rats displaying either weak LI and strong PREE and RL effects, or vice versa. These findings suggest that proactive interference may be based on a single underlying psychological system in rats.
published_date 2022-02-01T04:13:36Z
_version_ 1763753922458025984
score 11.03559

Similar Items