No Cover Image

E-Thesis 809 views 65 downloads

Sir William Jones and Oriental Mysticism / Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh

Swansea University Author: Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh

  • Baghaei-Abchooyeh_Hadi_PhD_Thesis_Final_Redacted.pdf

    PDF | Redacted version - open access

    Copyright: The author, Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh, 2021.

    Download (37.29MB)

DOI (Published version): 10.23889/SUthesis.58326

Abstract

Oriental mysticism, religion, and science are all intertwined with literature; while proven to be fantastic for many scholars, this intermixture has made it challenging to extract mystical concepts from poetry. This difficulty has been one of the earliest sources of conflict between Oriental literar...

Full description

Published: Swansea 2021
Institution: Swansea University
Degree level: Doctoral
Degree name: Ph.D
Supervisor: Franklin, Michael J. ; Franklin, Caroline
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa58326
first_indexed 2021-10-14T11:38:51Z
last_indexed 2024-11-14T12:13:29Z
id cronfa58326
recordtype RisThesis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2024-11-04T10:33:27.5872715</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>58326</id><entry>2021-10-14</entry><title>Sir William Jones and Oriental Mysticism</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>da91ecd1968d48d38c5a48537c28fd3e</sid><firstname>Hadi</firstname><surname>Baghaei-Abchooyeh</surname><name>Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2021-10-14</date><abstract>Oriental mysticism, religion, and science are all intertwined with literature; while proven to be fantastic for many scholars, this intermixture has made it challenging to extract mystical concepts from poetry. This difficulty has been one of the earliest sources of conflict between Oriental literary scholars, religious figures, and mystics. The situation becomes more complex should one attempt to compare Oriental mysticism with its Occidental counterpart. Arguably, the first Western scholar who conducted such a rigorous comparison was Sir William Jones (1746&#x2013;1794), a linguist, translator, and poet who was also a Supreme Court Judge in Calcutta. His fascination with Persian mystical poets such as Rumi (1210-1273), Sadi (1210-1292), and Hafez (1315-1390) drove him towards Sufism. Due to his understanding of Persian mysticism and culture, Jones became one of the best interpreters of Indo-Persian literature. His works, founded on his fascination with Persian language and literature, gained him the title of &#x2018;Persian Jones&#x2019; and established his international reputation as an Orientalist. Jones&#x2019;s publications highly impacted Romantic scholars, developing sympathetic representations of the Orient in the period&#x2019;s literature. Jones&#x2019;s works, letters, Persian manuscripts, and the annotations he made on them have not been examined for his Persian mystical studies before this thesis. Therefore, this PhD research will investigate his works and library on Sufism and his comparative study of mystical schools. It intends to analyse Jones&#x2019;s findings in his comparative mystical studies and elaborate on his understanding of Sufism. This thesis investigates his essays, letters, and annotations in various texts; such texts are mainly available in the Royal Asiatic Society archives and the British Library&#x2019;s India Office Records and Private Papers. Moreover, in some cases, Jones has altered his English translations of Persianate Sufi texts; these alterations will be examined and compared with the original texts to demonstrate Jones&#x2019;s rationale behind them. This research will pursue the accuracy of Jones&#x2019;s interpretation of Sufism and Hinduism. In addition, it examines his development of the interpretations of Oriental mysticism, which he presented to eighteenth-century Europe. The findings of this research will contribute to the growing literature on Orientalism and shed a brighter light on the works of Sir William Jones and Indo-Persian literature and mysticism.</abstract><type>E-Thesis</type><journal/><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication>Swansea</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>Sir William Jones, Eighteenth-Century Studies, Comparative Mysticism, Comparative Philosophy, Oriental Studies</keywords><publishedDay>14</publishedDay><publishedMonth>10</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-10-14</publishedDate><doi>10.23889/SUthesis.58326</doi><url/><notes>A selection of third party content is redacted or is partially redacted from this thesis due to copyright restrictions.ORCiD identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9166-2031</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><supervisor>Franklin, Michael J. ; Franklin, Caroline</supervisor><degreelevel>Doctoral</degreelevel><degreename>Ph.D</degreename><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-11-04T10:33:27.5872715</lastEdited><Created>2021-10-14T12:35:08.2959672</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Hadi</firstname><surname>Baghaei-Abchooyeh</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>58326__21174__29fed17b702440c5af99fc9acc7e5cd5.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Baghaei-Abchooyeh_Hadi_PhD_Thesis_Final_Redacted.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2021-10-14T18:01:38.2091115</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>39103118</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Redacted version - open access</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2024-10-11T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><documentNotes>Copyright: The author, Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh, 2021.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2024-11-04T10:33:27.5872715 v2 58326 2021-10-14 Sir William Jones and Oriental Mysticism da91ecd1968d48d38c5a48537c28fd3e Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh true false 2021-10-14 Oriental mysticism, religion, and science are all intertwined with literature; while proven to be fantastic for many scholars, this intermixture has made it challenging to extract mystical concepts from poetry. This difficulty has been one of the earliest sources of conflict between Oriental literary scholars, religious figures, and mystics. The situation becomes more complex should one attempt to compare Oriental mysticism with its Occidental counterpart. Arguably, the first Western scholar who conducted such a rigorous comparison was Sir William Jones (1746–1794), a linguist, translator, and poet who was also a Supreme Court Judge in Calcutta. His fascination with Persian mystical poets such as Rumi (1210-1273), Sadi (1210-1292), and Hafez (1315-1390) drove him towards Sufism. Due to his understanding of Persian mysticism and culture, Jones became one of the best interpreters of Indo-Persian literature. His works, founded on his fascination with Persian language and literature, gained him the title of ‘Persian Jones’ and established his international reputation as an Orientalist. Jones’s publications highly impacted Romantic scholars, developing sympathetic representations of the Orient in the period’s literature. Jones’s works, letters, Persian manuscripts, and the annotations he made on them have not been examined for his Persian mystical studies before this thesis. Therefore, this PhD research will investigate his works and library on Sufism and his comparative study of mystical schools. It intends to analyse Jones’s findings in his comparative mystical studies and elaborate on his understanding of Sufism. This thesis investigates his essays, letters, and annotations in various texts; such texts are mainly available in the Royal Asiatic Society archives and the British Library’s India Office Records and Private Papers. Moreover, in some cases, Jones has altered his English translations of Persianate Sufi texts; these alterations will be examined and compared with the original texts to demonstrate Jones’s rationale behind them. This research will pursue the accuracy of Jones’s interpretation of Sufism and Hinduism. In addition, it examines his development of the interpretations of Oriental mysticism, which he presented to eighteenth-century Europe. The findings of this research will contribute to the growing literature on Orientalism and shed a brighter light on the works of Sir William Jones and Indo-Persian literature and mysticism. E-Thesis Swansea Sir William Jones, Eighteenth-Century Studies, Comparative Mysticism, Comparative Philosophy, Oriental Studies 14 10 2021 2021-10-14 10.23889/SUthesis.58326 A selection of third party content is redacted or is partially redacted from this thesis due to copyright restrictions.ORCiD identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9166-2031 COLLEGE NANME COLLEGE CODE Swansea University Franklin, Michael J. ; Franklin, Caroline Doctoral Ph.D 2024-11-04T10:33:27.5872715 2021-10-14T12:35:08.2959672 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh 1 58326__21174__29fed17b702440c5af99fc9acc7e5cd5.pdf Baghaei-Abchooyeh_Hadi_PhD_Thesis_Final_Redacted.pdf 2021-10-14T18:01:38.2091115 Output 39103118 application/pdf Redacted version - open access true 2024-10-11T00:00:00.0000000 Copyright: The author, Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh, 2021. true eng
title Sir William Jones and Oriental Mysticism
spellingShingle Sir William Jones and Oriental Mysticism
Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh
title_short Sir William Jones and Oriental Mysticism
title_full Sir William Jones and Oriental Mysticism
title_fullStr Sir William Jones and Oriental Mysticism
title_full_unstemmed Sir William Jones and Oriental Mysticism
title_sort Sir William Jones and Oriental Mysticism
author_id_str_mv da91ecd1968d48d38c5a48537c28fd3e
author_id_fullname_str_mv da91ecd1968d48d38c5a48537c28fd3e_***_Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh
author Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh
author2 Hadi Baghaei-Abchooyeh
format E-Thesis
publishDate 2021
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.23889/SUthesis.58326
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Oriental mysticism, religion, and science are all intertwined with literature; while proven to be fantastic for many scholars, this intermixture has made it challenging to extract mystical concepts from poetry. This difficulty has been one of the earliest sources of conflict between Oriental literary scholars, religious figures, and mystics. The situation becomes more complex should one attempt to compare Oriental mysticism with its Occidental counterpart. Arguably, the first Western scholar who conducted such a rigorous comparison was Sir William Jones (1746–1794), a linguist, translator, and poet who was also a Supreme Court Judge in Calcutta. His fascination with Persian mystical poets such as Rumi (1210-1273), Sadi (1210-1292), and Hafez (1315-1390) drove him towards Sufism. Due to his understanding of Persian mysticism and culture, Jones became one of the best interpreters of Indo-Persian literature. His works, founded on his fascination with Persian language and literature, gained him the title of ‘Persian Jones’ and established his international reputation as an Orientalist. Jones’s publications highly impacted Romantic scholars, developing sympathetic representations of the Orient in the period’s literature. Jones’s works, letters, Persian manuscripts, and the annotations he made on them have not been examined for his Persian mystical studies before this thesis. Therefore, this PhD research will investigate his works and library on Sufism and his comparative study of mystical schools. It intends to analyse Jones’s findings in his comparative mystical studies and elaborate on his understanding of Sufism. This thesis investigates his essays, letters, and annotations in various texts; such texts are mainly available in the Royal Asiatic Society archives and the British Library’s India Office Records and Private Papers. Moreover, in some cases, Jones has altered his English translations of Persianate Sufi texts; these alterations will be examined and compared with the original texts to demonstrate Jones’s rationale behind them. This research will pursue the accuracy of Jones’s interpretation of Sufism and Hinduism. In addition, it examines his development of the interpretations of Oriental mysticism, which he presented to eighteenth-century Europe. The findings of this research will contribute to the growing literature on Orientalism and shed a brighter light on the works of Sir William Jones and Indo-Persian literature and mysticism.
published_date 2021-10-14T04:54:12Z
_version_ 1851729906562498560
score 11.089864

Similar Items