Journal article 602 views 95 downloads
Nurse-led home-visitation programme for first-time mothers in reducing maltreatment and improving child health and development (BB:2-6): longer-term outcomes from a randomised cohort using data linkage
BMJ Open, Volume: 12, Issue: 2, Start page: e049960
Swansea University Authors:
Deborah Fitzsimmons , Rhys Pockett
-
PDF | Version of Record
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY
Download (1.34MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049960
Abstract
Objectives: Measure effectiveness of family nurse partnership (FNP) home-visiting programme in reducing maltreatment and improving maternal health and child health, developmental and educational outcomes; explore effect moderators, mediators; describe costs.Design: Follow-up of BB:0-2 trial cohort (...
Published in: | BMJ Open |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
Published: |
BMJ
2022
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa59380 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2022-02-11T12:50:03Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2023-01-11T14:40:37Z |
id |
cronfa59380 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-12-09T11:50:59.0956436</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>59380</id><entry>2022-02-11</entry><title>Nurse-led home-visitation programme for first-time mothers in reducing maltreatment and improving child health and development (BB:2-6): longer-term outcomes from a randomised cohort using data linkage</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>e900d99a0977beccf607233b10c66b43</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-7286-8410</ORCID><firstname>Deborah</firstname><surname>Fitzsimmons</surname><name>Deborah Fitzsimmons</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>8a3882ebcc6a8fb3b2c13fc2ff716bf2</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-4135-7383</ORCID><firstname>Rhys</firstname><surname>Pockett</surname><name>Rhys Pockett</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-02-11</date><deptcode>PHAC</deptcode><abstract>Objectives: Measure effectiveness of family nurse partnership (FNP) home-visiting programme in reducing maltreatment and improving maternal health and child health, developmental and educational outcomes; explore effect moderators, mediators; describe costs.Design: Follow-up of BB:0-2 trial cohort (ISRCTN:23019866) up to age 7 years in England using record linkage.Participants: 1618 mothers aged 19 years or younger and their firstborn child(ren) recruited to BB:0-2 trial at less than 25 weeks gestation and not mandatorily withdrawn from trial or opted out. Intervention families were offered up to a maximum of 64 home visits by specially trained nurses from pregnancy until firstborn child was 2 years old, plus usually provided health and social care support. Comparator was usual care alone.Outcome measures: Primary outcome: state-verified child-in-need status recorded at any time during follow-up.Secondary outcomes: referral to social services, child protection registration (plan), child-in-need categorisation, looked-after status, recorded injuries and ingestions any time during follow-up, early childcare and educational attendance, school readiness and attainment at key stage 1 (KS1), healthcare costs.Results: Match rates for 1547 eligible children (1517 singletons, 15 sets of twins) were 98.3% (NHS Digital) and 97.4% (National Pupil Database). There was no difference between study arms in the proportion of children being registered as in need (adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.31), or for any other measure of maltreatment. Children in the FNP arm were more likely to achieve a good level of development at reception age (school readiness) (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.52). After adjusting for birth month, children in FNP arm were more likely to reach the expected standard in reading at KS1 (adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.57). We found no trial arm differences for resource use and costs.Conclusions: FNP did not improve maltreatment or maternal outcomes. There was evidence of small advantages in school readiness and attainment at KS1.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>BMJ Open</journal><volume>12</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>e049960</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>BMJ</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>2044-6055</issnPrint><issnElectronic>2044-6055</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>10</publishedDay><publishedMonth>2</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2022</publishedYear><publishedDate>2022-02-10</publishedDate><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049960</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Public Health</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>PHAC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research (NIHR PHR) Programme (reference:11/3002/11)</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-12-09T11:50:59.0956436</lastEdited><Created>2022-02-11T12:44:52.6264599</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Health and Social Care</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Michael</firstname><surname>Robling</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1004-036x</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Fiona V</firstname><surname>Lugg-Widger</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0029-9703</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Rebecca</firstname><surname>Cannings-John</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Lianna</firstname><surname>Angel</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Sue</firstname><surname>Channon</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Deborah</firstname><surname>Fitzsimmons</surname><orcid>0000-0002-7286-8410</orcid><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Kerenza</firstname><surname>Hood</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Joyce</firstname><surname>Kenkre</surname><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Gwenllian</firstname><surname>Moody</surname><order>9</order></author><author><firstname>Eleri</firstname><surname>Owen-Jones</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0850-4724</orcid><order>10</order></author><author><firstname>Rhys</firstname><surname>Pockett</surname><orcid>0000-0003-4135-7383</orcid><order>11</order></author><author><firstname>Julia</firstname><surname>Sanders</surname><order>12</order></author><author><firstname>Jeremy</firstname><surname>Segrott</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6215-0870</orcid><order>13</order></author><author><firstname>Thomas</firstname><surname>Slater</surname><orcid>0000-0003-3840-2454</orcid><order>14</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>59380__22358__4ae2f2fa55e84b3e9e54fe12dc99c31d.pdf</filename><originalFilename>e049960.full.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-02-11T12:49:14.5677502</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1407730</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2022-12-09T11:50:59.0956436 v2 59380 2022-02-11 Nurse-led home-visitation programme for first-time mothers in reducing maltreatment and improving child health and development (BB:2-6): longer-term outcomes from a randomised cohort using data linkage e900d99a0977beccf607233b10c66b43 0000-0002-7286-8410 Deborah Fitzsimmons Deborah Fitzsimmons true false 8a3882ebcc6a8fb3b2c13fc2ff716bf2 0000-0003-4135-7383 Rhys Pockett Rhys Pockett true false 2022-02-11 PHAC Objectives: Measure effectiveness of family nurse partnership (FNP) home-visiting programme in reducing maltreatment and improving maternal health and child health, developmental and educational outcomes; explore effect moderators, mediators; describe costs.Design: Follow-up of BB:0-2 trial cohort (ISRCTN:23019866) up to age 7 years in England using record linkage.Participants: 1618 mothers aged 19 years or younger and their firstborn child(ren) recruited to BB:0-2 trial at less than 25 weeks gestation and not mandatorily withdrawn from trial or opted out. Intervention families were offered up to a maximum of 64 home visits by specially trained nurses from pregnancy until firstborn child was 2 years old, plus usually provided health and social care support. Comparator was usual care alone.Outcome measures: Primary outcome: state-verified child-in-need status recorded at any time during follow-up.Secondary outcomes: referral to social services, child protection registration (plan), child-in-need categorisation, looked-after status, recorded injuries and ingestions any time during follow-up, early childcare and educational attendance, school readiness and attainment at key stage 1 (KS1), healthcare costs.Results: Match rates for 1547 eligible children (1517 singletons, 15 sets of twins) were 98.3% (NHS Digital) and 97.4% (National Pupil Database). There was no difference between study arms in the proportion of children being registered as in need (adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.31), or for any other measure of maltreatment. Children in the FNP arm were more likely to achieve a good level of development at reception age (school readiness) (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.52). After adjusting for birth month, children in FNP arm were more likely to reach the expected standard in reading at KS1 (adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.57). We found no trial arm differences for resource use and costs.Conclusions: FNP did not improve maltreatment or maternal outcomes. There was evidence of small advantages in school readiness and attainment at KS1. Journal Article BMJ Open 12 2 e049960 BMJ 2044-6055 2044-6055 10 2 2022 2022-02-10 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049960 COLLEGE NANME Public Health COLLEGE CODE PHAC Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research (NIHR PHR) Programme (reference:11/3002/11) 2022-12-09T11:50:59.0956436 2022-02-11T12:44:52.6264599 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Health and Social Care Michael Robling 0000-0002-1004-036x 1 Fiona V Lugg-Widger 0000-0003-0029-9703 2 Rebecca Cannings-John 3 Lianna Angel 4 Sue Channon 5 Deborah Fitzsimmons 0000-0002-7286-8410 6 Kerenza Hood 7 Joyce Kenkre 8 Gwenllian Moody 9 Eleri Owen-Jones 0000-0003-0850-4724 10 Rhys Pockett 0000-0003-4135-7383 11 Julia Sanders 12 Jeremy Segrott 0000-0001-6215-0870 13 Thomas Slater 0000-0003-3840-2454 14 59380__22358__4ae2f2fa55e84b3e9e54fe12dc99c31d.pdf e049960.full.pdf 2022-02-11T12:49:14.5677502 Output 1407730 application/pdf Version of Record true © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
Nurse-led home-visitation programme for first-time mothers in reducing maltreatment and improving child health and development (BB:2-6): longer-term outcomes from a randomised cohort using data linkage |
spellingShingle |
Nurse-led home-visitation programme for first-time mothers in reducing maltreatment and improving child health and development (BB:2-6): longer-term outcomes from a randomised cohort using data linkage Deborah Fitzsimmons Rhys Pockett |
title_short |
Nurse-led home-visitation programme for first-time mothers in reducing maltreatment and improving child health and development (BB:2-6): longer-term outcomes from a randomised cohort using data linkage |
title_full |
Nurse-led home-visitation programme for first-time mothers in reducing maltreatment and improving child health and development (BB:2-6): longer-term outcomes from a randomised cohort using data linkage |
title_fullStr |
Nurse-led home-visitation programme for first-time mothers in reducing maltreatment and improving child health and development (BB:2-6): longer-term outcomes from a randomised cohort using data linkage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nurse-led home-visitation programme for first-time mothers in reducing maltreatment and improving child health and development (BB:2-6): longer-term outcomes from a randomised cohort using data linkage |
title_sort |
Nurse-led home-visitation programme for first-time mothers in reducing maltreatment and improving child health and development (BB:2-6): longer-term outcomes from a randomised cohort using data linkage |
author_id_str_mv |
e900d99a0977beccf607233b10c66b43 8a3882ebcc6a8fb3b2c13fc2ff716bf2 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
e900d99a0977beccf607233b10c66b43_***_Deborah Fitzsimmons 8a3882ebcc6a8fb3b2c13fc2ff716bf2_***_Rhys Pockett |
author |
Deborah Fitzsimmons Rhys Pockett |
author2 |
Michael Robling Fiona V Lugg-Widger Rebecca Cannings-John Lianna Angel Sue Channon Deborah Fitzsimmons Kerenza Hood Joyce Kenkre Gwenllian Moody Eleri Owen-Jones Rhys Pockett Julia Sanders Jeremy Segrott Thomas Slater |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
BMJ Open |
container_volume |
12 |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
e049960 |
publishDate |
2022 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
2044-6055 2044-6055 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049960 |
publisher |
BMJ |
college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
department_str |
School of Health and Social Care{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Health and Social Care |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Objectives: Measure effectiveness of family nurse partnership (FNP) home-visiting programme in reducing maltreatment and improving maternal health and child health, developmental and educational outcomes; explore effect moderators, mediators; describe costs.Design: Follow-up of BB:0-2 trial cohort (ISRCTN:23019866) up to age 7 years in England using record linkage.Participants: 1618 mothers aged 19 years or younger and their firstborn child(ren) recruited to BB:0-2 trial at less than 25 weeks gestation and not mandatorily withdrawn from trial or opted out. Intervention families were offered up to a maximum of 64 home visits by specially trained nurses from pregnancy until firstborn child was 2 years old, plus usually provided health and social care support. Comparator was usual care alone.Outcome measures: Primary outcome: state-verified child-in-need status recorded at any time during follow-up.Secondary outcomes: referral to social services, child protection registration (plan), child-in-need categorisation, looked-after status, recorded injuries and ingestions any time during follow-up, early childcare and educational attendance, school readiness and attainment at key stage 1 (KS1), healthcare costs.Results: Match rates for 1547 eligible children (1517 singletons, 15 sets of twins) were 98.3% (NHS Digital) and 97.4% (National Pupil Database). There was no difference between study arms in the proportion of children being registered as in need (adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.31), or for any other measure of maltreatment. Children in the FNP arm were more likely to achieve a good level of development at reception age (school readiness) (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.52). After adjusting for birth month, children in FNP arm were more likely to reach the expected standard in reading at KS1 (adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.57). We found no trial arm differences for resource use and costs.Conclusions: FNP did not improve maltreatment or maternal outcomes. There was evidence of small advantages in school readiness and attainment at KS1. |
published_date |
2022-02-10T04:16:38Z |
_version_ |
1763754113828388864 |
score |
11.021648 |