Journal article 607 views 86 downloads
Essay mills and other contract cheating services: to buy or not to buy and the consequences of students changing their minds
,
Thomas Lancaster,
Sandie Dann,
Robin Crockett,
Irene Glendinning
International Journal for Educational Integrity, Volume: 17, Issue: 1
Swansea University Author:
Michael Draper
-
PDF | Version of Record
© The Author(s). 2021 This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Download (576.9KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1007/s40979-021-00081-x
Abstract
Very few parts of the world have legislation that prohibits the operation or the promotion of contract cheating services. This means that commercial companies providing such services can formally register and operate in most countries. If a student enters into an agreement with a contract cheating p...
| Published in: | International Journal for Educational Integrity |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1833-2595 |
| Published: |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
2021
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa59433 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract: |
Very few parts of the world have legislation that prohibits the operation or the promotion of contract cheating services. This means that commercial companies providing such services can formally register and operate in most countries. If a student enters into an agreement with a contract cheating provider, what rights do they have to change their mind and what are the risks if they choose to do so? This paper examines the question through legal, institutional and societal lenses, showing that although a student has the consumer rights to withdraw from a contract with an essay mill, they may also be putting their future at risk by doing so. Contract cheating providers are now embedded within many institutions, using sharp practices to connect with vulnerable customers, but are also perfectly placed to blackmail students or threaten to report them to their institution if they ask to cancel their order. The paper argues that, while not condoning the practice of contract cheating, supportive processes need to be in place to help students at risk as part of standard institutional duty of care. This must be backed up by institutional policy that considers academic integrity as a core value for all. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
Contract cheating; Contract formation; Consumer rights; Student behaviour; Educational institutional policies |
| College: |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| Issue: |
1 |