Book chapter 658 views 109 downloads
Physical ‘Wholeness’ and ‘Incompleteness’ in Victorian Prosthesis Narratives
Literature and Medicine, Volume: 2, Pages: 230 - 246
Swansea University Author: Ryan Sweet
-
PDF | Accepted Manuscript
Download (255.76KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1017/9781108355148.016
Abstract
This essay investigates how and why physical ‘wholeness’ became culturally dominant in the nineteenth century, and how literary representations of prosthetics engaged with this hegemony. The first part parses the historical factors underpinning the rise of physical ‘normalcy’, including coalescing t...
Published in: | Literature and Medicine |
---|---|
ISBN: | 9781108355148 |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa59579 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2022-03-12T04:27:36Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2022-04-01T03:20:06Z |
id |
cronfa59579 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>59579</id><entry>2022-03-11</entry><title>Physical ‘Wholeness’ and ‘Incompleteness’ in Victorian Prosthesis Narratives</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>6c7e97eb11090ab27457aee892340748</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-1337-5699</ORCID><firstname>Ryan</firstname><surname>Sweet</surname><name>Ryan Sweet</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-03-11</date><deptcode>ACLA</deptcode><abstract>This essay investigates how and why physical ‘wholeness’ became culturally dominant in the nineteenth century, and how literary representations of prosthetics engaged with this hegemony. The first part parses the historical factors underpinning the rise of physical ‘normalcy’, including coalescing theories that drew together mind and body, the rise of bodily statistics, lingering fears of contagion, changes to the Poor Laws, unshifting gendered social demands, and the marketing efforts of emerging prosthetists. The second part then turns to transgressive literary imaginaries of prostheses. Using two fictional case studies that represent artificial-hand users, English poet, novelist, and playwright Robert Williams Buchanan’s ‘Lady Letitia’s Lilliput Hand’ (1862) and the lesser-known short-story writer T. Lockhart’s ‘Prince Rupert’s Emerald Ring’ (1895), I argue that literary representations of prostheses often simultaneously reinforced and complicated the hegemony of physical ‘completeness’. Such stories perpetuated fears of physical disaggregation while also bringing into question the efficacy of prostheticising. This essay therefore offers an innovative approach to Victorian studies and the history of prostheses by re-evaluating attitudes to artificial body parts in relation to the social mandate for ‘wholeness’ and highlighting how literary texts provided important critiques of prostheses designed to enable users to ‘pass’ as ‘normal’.</abstract><type>Book chapter</type><journal>Literature and Medicine</journal><volume>2</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>230</paginationStart><paginationEnd>246</paginationEnd><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic>9781108355148</isbnElectronic><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>disability; prosthesis; artificial hand; physical wholeness; normalcy; gender; the body; Robert Williams Buchanan; T. Lockhart</keywords><publishedDay>4</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-06-04</publishedDate><doi>10.1017/9781108355148.016</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Classics</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>ACLA</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Not Required</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-12-22T11:14:22.1537603</lastEdited><Created>2022-03-11T08:53:04.6340151</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Ryan</firstname><surname>Sweet</surname><orcid>0000-0003-1337-5699</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>59579__23754__5c6c273f6d3a42939c7478909e7c31df.pdf</filename><originalFilename>59579.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-03-31T17:11:00.6198256</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>261901</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
v2 59579 2022-03-11 Physical ‘Wholeness’ and ‘Incompleteness’ in Victorian Prosthesis Narratives 6c7e97eb11090ab27457aee892340748 0000-0003-1337-5699 Ryan Sweet Ryan Sweet true false 2022-03-11 ACLA This essay investigates how and why physical ‘wholeness’ became culturally dominant in the nineteenth century, and how literary representations of prosthetics engaged with this hegemony. The first part parses the historical factors underpinning the rise of physical ‘normalcy’, including coalescing theories that drew together mind and body, the rise of bodily statistics, lingering fears of contagion, changes to the Poor Laws, unshifting gendered social demands, and the marketing efforts of emerging prosthetists. The second part then turns to transgressive literary imaginaries of prostheses. Using two fictional case studies that represent artificial-hand users, English poet, novelist, and playwright Robert Williams Buchanan’s ‘Lady Letitia’s Lilliput Hand’ (1862) and the lesser-known short-story writer T. Lockhart’s ‘Prince Rupert’s Emerald Ring’ (1895), I argue that literary representations of prostheses often simultaneously reinforced and complicated the hegemony of physical ‘completeness’. Such stories perpetuated fears of physical disaggregation while also bringing into question the efficacy of prostheticising. This essay therefore offers an innovative approach to Victorian studies and the history of prostheses by re-evaluating attitudes to artificial body parts in relation to the social mandate for ‘wholeness’ and highlighting how literary texts provided important critiques of prostheses designed to enable users to ‘pass’ as ‘normal’. Book chapter Literature and Medicine 2 230 246 Cambridge University Press 9781108355148 disability; prosthesis; artificial hand; physical wholeness; normalcy; gender; the body; Robert Williams Buchanan; T. Lockhart 4 6 2021 2021-06-04 10.1017/9781108355148.016 COLLEGE NANME Classics COLLEGE CODE ACLA Swansea University Not Required 2023-12-22T11:14:22.1537603 2022-03-11T08:53:04.6340151 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing Ryan Sweet 0000-0003-1337-5699 1 59579__23754__5c6c273f6d3a42939c7478909e7c31df.pdf 59579.pdf 2022-03-31T17:11:00.6198256 Output 261901 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true true eng |
title |
Physical ‘Wholeness’ and ‘Incompleteness’ in Victorian Prosthesis Narratives |
spellingShingle |
Physical ‘Wholeness’ and ‘Incompleteness’ in Victorian Prosthesis Narratives Ryan Sweet |
title_short |
Physical ‘Wholeness’ and ‘Incompleteness’ in Victorian Prosthesis Narratives |
title_full |
Physical ‘Wholeness’ and ‘Incompleteness’ in Victorian Prosthesis Narratives |
title_fullStr |
Physical ‘Wholeness’ and ‘Incompleteness’ in Victorian Prosthesis Narratives |
title_full_unstemmed |
Physical ‘Wholeness’ and ‘Incompleteness’ in Victorian Prosthesis Narratives |
title_sort |
Physical ‘Wholeness’ and ‘Incompleteness’ in Victorian Prosthesis Narratives |
author_id_str_mv |
6c7e97eb11090ab27457aee892340748 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
6c7e97eb11090ab27457aee892340748_***_Ryan Sweet |
author |
Ryan Sweet |
author2 |
Ryan Sweet |
format |
Book chapter |
container_title |
Literature and Medicine |
container_volume |
2 |
container_start_page |
230 |
publishDate |
2021 |
institution |
Swansea University |
isbn |
9781108355148 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1017/9781108355148.016 |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
This essay investigates how and why physical ‘wholeness’ became culturally dominant in the nineteenth century, and how literary representations of prosthetics engaged with this hegemony. The first part parses the historical factors underpinning the rise of physical ‘normalcy’, including coalescing theories that drew together mind and body, the rise of bodily statistics, lingering fears of contagion, changes to the Poor Laws, unshifting gendered social demands, and the marketing efforts of emerging prosthetists. The second part then turns to transgressive literary imaginaries of prostheses. Using two fictional case studies that represent artificial-hand users, English poet, novelist, and playwright Robert Williams Buchanan’s ‘Lady Letitia’s Lilliput Hand’ (1862) and the lesser-known short-story writer T. Lockhart’s ‘Prince Rupert’s Emerald Ring’ (1895), I argue that literary representations of prostheses often simultaneously reinforced and complicated the hegemony of physical ‘completeness’. Such stories perpetuated fears of physical disaggregation while also bringing into question the efficacy of prostheticising. This essay therefore offers an innovative approach to Victorian studies and the history of prostheses by re-evaluating attitudes to artificial body parts in relation to the social mandate for ‘wholeness’ and highlighting how literary texts provided important critiques of prostheses designed to enable users to ‘pass’ as ‘normal’. |
published_date |
2021-06-04T11:14:23Z |
_version_ |
1785980427385700352 |
score |
11.036706 |