No Cover Image

Journal article 633 views 61 downloads

People react more positively to female- than to male-favoring sex differences: A direct replication of a counterintuitive finding

Steve Stewart-Williams Orcid Logo, Xiu Ling Wong, Chern Yi Marybeth Chang, Andrew Thomas Orcid Logo

PLOS ONE, Volume: 17, Issue: 3, Start page: e0266171

Swansea University Author: Andrew Thomas Orcid Logo

  • journal.pone.0266171.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2022 Stewart-Williams et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

    Download (732.63KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1371/journal.pone.0266171

Abstract

We report a direct replication of our earlier study looking at how people react to research on sex differences depending on whether the research puts men or women in a better light. Three-hundred-and-three participants read a fictional popular-science article about fabricated research finding that w...

Full description

Published in: PLOS ONE
ISSN: 1932-6203
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa59772
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2022-04-06T14:00:01Z
last_indexed 2023-01-11T14:41:16Z
id cronfa59772
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><datestamp>2022-07-13T12:19:55.3163285</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>59772</id><entry>2022-04-06</entry><title>People react more positively to female- than to male-favoring sex differences: A direct replication of a counterintuitive finding</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>a43308ae6d7f5b8d5ab0daff5b832a96</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-5251-7923</ORCID><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Thomas</surname><name>Andrew Thomas</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-04-06</date><deptcode>HPS</deptcode><abstract>We report a direct replication of our earlier study looking at how people react to research on sex differences depending on whether the research puts men or women in a better light. Three-hundred-and-three participants read a fictional popular-science article about fabricated research finding that women score higher on a desirable trait/lower on an undesirable one (female-favoring difference) or that men do (male-favoring difference). Consistent with our original study, both sexes reacted less positively to the male-favoring differences, with no difference between men and women in the strength of this effect. Also consistent with our original study, belief in male privilege and a left-leaning political orientation predicted less positive reactions to the male-favoring sex differences; neither variable, however, predicted reactions to the female-favoring sex differences (in the original study, male-privilege belief predicted positive reactions). As well as looking at how participants reacted to the research, we looked at their predictions about how the average man and woman would react. Consistent with our earlier results, participants of both sexes predicted that the average man and woman would exhibit considerable own-sex favoritism. In doing so, they exaggerated the magnitude of the average woman&#x2019;s own-sex favoritism and predicted strong own-sex favoritism from the average man when in fact the average man exhibited modest other-sex favoritism. A greater awareness of people&#x2019;s tendency to exaggerate own-sex bias could help to ameliorate conflict between the sexes.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>PLOS ONE</journal><volume>17</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart>e0266171</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>1932-6203</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2022</publishedYear><publishedDate>2022-03-30</publishedDate><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0266171</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</funders><lastEdited>2022-07-13T12:19:55.3163285</lastEdited><Created>2022-04-06T14:13:12.1314497</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Steve</firstname><surname>Stewart-Williams</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8568-6846</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Xiu Ling</firstname><surname>Wong</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Chern Yi Marybeth</firstname><surname>Chang</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Thomas</surname><orcid>0000-0001-5251-7923</orcid><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>59772__23782__30b7753739fc4d76ab158df44472c1ee.pdf</filename><originalFilename>journal.pone.0266171.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-04-06T14:27:45.2684026</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>750217</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>&#xA9; 2022 Stewart-Williams et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs><OutputDur><Id>97</Id><IsDataAvailableOnline>true</IsDataAvailableOnline><DataNotAvailableOnlineReasonId>2</DataNotAvailableOnlineReasonId><DurUrl>https://osf.io/ctnez/</DurUrl><IsDurRestrictions>false</IsDurRestrictions><DurRestrictionReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><DurEmbargoDate xsi:nil="true"/></OutputDur></OutputDurs></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-07-13T12:19:55.3163285 v2 59772 2022-04-06 People react more positively to female- than to male-favoring sex differences: A direct replication of a counterintuitive finding a43308ae6d7f5b8d5ab0daff5b832a96 0000-0001-5251-7923 Andrew Thomas Andrew Thomas true false 2022-04-06 HPS We report a direct replication of our earlier study looking at how people react to research on sex differences depending on whether the research puts men or women in a better light. Three-hundred-and-three participants read a fictional popular-science article about fabricated research finding that women score higher on a desirable trait/lower on an undesirable one (female-favoring difference) or that men do (male-favoring difference). Consistent with our original study, both sexes reacted less positively to the male-favoring differences, with no difference between men and women in the strength of this effect. Also consistent with our original study, belief in male privilege and a left-leaning political orientation predicted less positive reactions to the male-favoring sex differences; neither variable, however, predicted reactions to the female-favoring sex differences (in the original study, male-privilege belief predicted positive reactions). As well as looking at how participants reacted to the research, we looked at their predictions about how the average man and woman would react. Consistent with our earlier results, participants of both sexes predicted that the average man and woman would exhibit considerable own-sex favoritism. In doing so, they exaggerated the magnitude of the average woman’s own-sex favoritism and predicted strong own-sex favoritism from the average man when in fact the average man exhibited modest other-sex favoritism. A greater awareness of people’s tendency to exaggerate own-sex bias could help to ameliorate conflict between the sexes. Journal Article PLOS ONE 17 3 e0266171 Public Library of Science (PLoS) 1932-6203 30 3 2022 2022-03-30 10.1371/journal.pone.0266171 COLLEGE NANME Psychology COLLEGE CODE HPS Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee The authors received no specific funding for this work. 2022-07-13T12:19:55.3163285 2022-04-06T14:13:12.1314497 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Steve Stewart-Williams 0000-0001-8568-6846 1 Xiu Ling Wong 2 Chern Yi Marybeth Chang 3 Andrew Thomas 0000-0001-5251-7923 4 59772__23782__30b7753739fc4d76ab158df44472c1ee.pdf journal.pone.0266171.pdf 2022-04-06T14:27:45.2684026 Output 750217 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2022 Stewart-Williams et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 97 true 2 https://osf.io/ctnez/ false
title People react more positively to female- than to male-favoring sex differences: A direct replication of a counterintuitive finding
spellingShingle People react more positively to female- than to male-favoring sex differences: A direct replication of a counterintuitive finding
Andrew Thomas
title_short People react more positively to female- than to male-favoring sex differences: A direct replication of a counterintuitive finding
title_full People react more positively to female- than to male-favoring sex differences: A direct replication of a counterintuitive finding
title_fullStr People react more positively to female- than to male-favoring sex differences: A direct replication of a counterintuitive finding
title_full_unstemmed People react more positively to female- than to male-favoring sex differences: A direct replication of a counterintuitive finding
title_sort People react more positively to female- than to male-favoring sex differences: A direct replication of a counterintuitive finding
author_id_str_mv a43308ae6d7f5b8d5ab0daff5b832a96
author_id_fullname_str_mv a43308ae6d7f5b8d5ab0daff5b832a96_***_Andrew Thomas
author Andrew Thomas
author2 Steve Stewart-Williams
Xiu Ling Wong
Chern Yi Marybeth Chang
Andrew Thomas
format Journal article
container_title PLOS ONE
container_volume 17
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0266171
publishDate 2022
institution Swansea University
issn 1932-6203
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0266171
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description We report a direct replication of our earlier study looking at how people react to research on sex differences depending on whether the research puts men or women in a better light. Three-hundred-and-three participants read a fictional popular-science article about fabricated research finding that women score higher on a desirable trait/lower on an undesirable one (female-favoring difference) or that men do (male-favoring difference). Consistent with our original study, both sexes reacted less positively to the male-favoring differences, with no difference between men and women in the strength of this effect. Also consistent with our original study, belief in male privilege and a left-leaning political orientation predicted less positive reactions to the male-favoring sex differences; neither variable, however, predicted reactions to the female-favoring sex differences (in the original study, male-privilege belief predicted positive reactions). As well as looking at how participants reacted to the research, we looked at their predictions about how the average man and woman would react. Consistent with our earlier results, participants of both sexes predicted that the average man and woman would exhibit considerable own-sex favoritism. In doing so, they exaggerated the magnitude of the average woman’s own-sex favoritism and predicted strong own-sex favoritism from the average man when in fact the average man exhibited modest other-sex favoritism. A greater awareness of people’s tendency to exaggerate own-sex bias could help to ameliorate conflict between the sexes.
published_date 2022-03-30T04:17:20Z
_version_ 1763754157077954560
score 11.012678

Similar Items