Journal article 325 views 63 downloads
Listening-Based Communication Ability in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures
Frontiers in Psychology, Volume: 13
Swansea University Author: Sarah Hughes
-
PDF | Version of Record
Copyright © 2022 Neal, McMahon, Hughes and Boisvert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)
Download (1.64MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786347
Abstract
Introduction: Hearing loss in adults has a pervasive impact on health and well-being. Its effects on everyday listening and communication can directly influence participation across multiple spheres of life. These impacts, however, remain poorly assessed within clinical settings. Whilst various test...
Published in: | Frontiers in Psychology |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1664-1078 |
Published: |
Frontiers Media SA
2022
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa60740 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract: |
Introduction: Hearing loss in adults has a pervasive impact on health and well-being. Its effects on everyday listening and communication can directly influence participation across multiple spheres of life. These impacts, however, remain poorly assessed within clinical settings. Whilst various tests and questionnaires that measure listening and communication abilities are available, there is a lack of consensus about which measures assess the factors that are most relevant to optimising auditory rehabilitation. This study aimed to map current measures used in published studies to evaluate listening skills needed for oral communication in adults with hearing loss.Methods: A scoping review was conducted using systematic searches in Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar to retrieve peer-reviewed articles that used one or more linguistic-based measure necessary to oral communication in adults with hearing loss. The range of measures identified and their frequency where charted in relation to auditory hierarchies, linguistic domains, health status domains, and associated neuropsychological and cognitive domains.Results: 9121 articles were identified and 2579 articles that reported on 6714 discrete measures were included for further analysis. The predominant linguistic-based measure reported was word or sentence identification in quiet (65.9%). In contrast, discourse-based measures were used in 2.7% of the articles included. Of the included studies, 36.6% used a self-reported instrument purporting to measures of listening for communication. Consistent with previous studies, a large number of self-reported measures were identified (n = 139), but 60.4% of these measures were used in only one study and 80.7% were cited five times or fewer.Discussion: Current measures used in published studies to assess listening abilities relevant to oral communication target a narrow set of domains. Concepts of communicative interaction have limited representation in current measurement. The lack of measurement consensus and heterogeneity amongst the assessments limit comparisons across studies. Furthermore, extracted measures rarely consider the broader linguistic, cognitive and interactive elements of communication. Consequently, existing measures may have limited clinical application if assessing the listening-related skills required for communication in daily life, as experienced by adults with hearing loss. |
---|---|
Keywords: |
listening, communication ability, hearing loss, adults, scoping review, outcome measure |
College: |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
Funders: |
SH receives funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands, UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), and declares personal fees from Aparito Limited and Cochlear Limited outside the submitted work. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication. |