Journal article 182 views 54 downloads
Preliminary psychometric scale development using the mixed methods Delphi technique
Yavor Dragostinov
,
Daney Harðardóttir,
Peter Edward McKenna,
David A. Robb,
Birthe Nesset,
Muneeb Ahmad
,
Marta Romeo,
Mei Yii Lim,
Chuang Yu,
Youngkyoon Jang,
Mohammed Diab,
Angelo Cangelosi,
Yiannis Demiris,
Helen Hastie,
Gnanathusharan Rajendran
Methods in Psychology, Volume: 7, Start page: 100103
Swansea University Author:
Muneeb Ahmad
-
PDF | Accepted Manuscript
Download (355.73KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.metip.2022.100103
Abstract
This study implemented a Delphi Method; a systematic technique which relies on a panel of experts to achieve consensus, to evaluate which questionnaire items would be the most relevant for developing a new Propensity to Trust scale. Following an initial research team moderation phase, two surveys we...
| Published in: | Methods in Psychology |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2590-2601 |
| Published: |
Elsevier BV
2022
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa60767 |
| first_indexed |
2025-01-30T16:02:04Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2025-10-16T08:29:42Z |
| id |
cronfa60767 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-10-15T15:50:24.4669119</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>60767</id><entry>2022-08-05</entry><title>Preliminary psychometric scale development using the mixed methods Delphi technique</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>9c42fd947397b1ad2bfa9107457974d5</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8111-9967</ORCID><firstname>Muneeb</firstname><surname>Ahmad</surname><name>Muneeb Ahmad</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-08-05</date><deptcode>MACS</deptcode><abstract>This study implemented a Delphi Method; a systematic technique which relies on a panel of experts to achieve consensus, to evaluate which questionnaire items would be the most relevant for developing a new Propensity to Trust scale. Following an initial research team moderation phase, two surveys were administered to academic lecturers, professors and Ph.D. candidates specialising in the fields of either individual differences, human-robot interaction, or occupational psychology. Results from 28 experts produced 33 final questionnaire items that were deemed relevant for evaluating trust. We discuss the importance of content validity when implementing scales, while emphasising the need for more documented scale development processes in psychology. Furthermore, we propose that the Delphi technique could be utilised as an effective and economical method for achieving content validity, while also providing greater scale creation transparency.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Methods in Psychology</journal><volume>7</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>100103</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>2590-2601</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2022</publishedYear><publishedDate>2022-12-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.metip.2022.100103</doi><url>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2022.100103</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Mathematics and Computer Science School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>MACS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>This work was supported by the UKRI Node on Trust (EP/V026682/1).</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-10-15T15:50:24.4669119</lastEdited><Created>2022-08-05T16:48:14.5952630</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Yavor</firstname><surname>Dragostinov</surname><orcid>0000-0002-8090-9614</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Daney</firstname><surname>Harðardóttir</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Peter Edward</firstname><surname>McKenna</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>David A.</firstname><surname>Robb</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Birthe</firstname><surname>Nesset</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Muneeb</firstname><surname>Ahmad</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8111-9967</orcid><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Marta</firstname><surname>Romeo</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Mei Yii</firstname><surname>Lim</surname><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Chuang</firstname><surname>Yu</surname><order>9</order></author><author><firstname>Youngkyoon</firstname><surname>Jang</surname><order>10</order></author><author><firstname>Mohammed</firstname><surname>Diab</surname><order>11</order></author><author><firstname>Angelo</firstname><surname>Cangelosi</surname><order>12</order></author><author><firstname>Yiannis</firstname><surname>Demiris</surname><order>13</order></author><author><firstname>Helen</firstname><surname>Hastie</surname><order>14</order></author><author><firstname>Gnanathusharan</firstname><surname>Rajendran</surname><order>15</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>60767__25865__43ba023cf4264e56bc1d7a3d131e938c.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Dragostinov_et_al_(accepted).docx</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-11-21T14:21:58.8710171</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>187388</contentLength><contentType>application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><copyrightCorrect>false</copyrightCorrect></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
2025-10-15T15:50:24.4669119 v2 60767 2022-08-05 Preliminary psychometric scale development using the mixed methods Delphi technique 9c42fd947397b1ad2bfa9107457974d5 0000-0001-8111-9967 Muneeb Ahmad Muneeb Ahmad true false 2022-08-05 MACS This study implemented a Delphi Method; a systematic technique which relies on a panel of experts to achieve consensus, to evaluate which questionnaire items would be the most relevant for developing a new Propensity to Trust scale. Following an initial research team moderation phase, two surveys were administered to academic lecturers, professors and Ph.D. candidates specialising in the fields of either individual differences, human-robot interaction, or occupational psychology. Results from 28 experts produced 33 final questionnaire items that were deemed relevant for evaluating trust. We discuss the importance of content validity when implementing scales, while emphasising the need for more documented scale development processes in psychology. Furthermore, we propose that the Delphi technique could be utilised as an effective and economical method for achieving content validity, while also providing greater scale creation transparency. Journal Article Methods in Psychology 7 100103 Elsevier BV 2590-2601 1 12 2022 2022-12-01 10.1016/j.metip.2022.100103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2022.100103 COLLEGE NANME Mathematics and Computer Science School COLLEGE CODE MACS Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee This work was supported by the UKRI Node on Trust (EP/V026682/1). 2025-10-15T15:50:24.4669119 2022-08-05T16:48:14.5952630 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science Yavor Dragostinov 0000-0002-8090-9614 1 Daney Harðardóttir 2 Peter Edward McKenna 3 David A. Robb 4 Birthe Nesset 5 Muneeb Ahmad 0000-0001-8111-9967 6 Marta Romeo 7 Mei Yii Lim 8 Chuang Yu 9 Youngkyoon Jang 10 Mohammed Diab 11 Angelo Cangelosi 12 Yiannis Demiris 13 Helen Hastie 14 Gnanathusharan Rajendran 15 60767__25865__43ba023cf4264e56bc1d7a3d131e938c.pdf Dragostinov_et_al_(accepted).docx 2022-11-21T14:21:58.8710171 Output 187388 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Accepted Manuscript true false |
| title |
Preliminary psychometric scale development using the mixed methods Delphi technique |
| spellingShingle |
Preliminary psychometric scale development using the mixed methods Delphi technique Muneeb Ahmad |
| title_short |
Preliminary psychometric scale development using the mixed methods Delphi technique |
| title_full |
Preliminary psychometric scale development using the mixed methods Delphi technique |
| title_fullStr |
Preliminary psychometric scale development using the mixed methods Delphi technique |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Preliminary psychometric scale development using the mixed methods Delphi technique |
| title_sort |
Preliminary psychometric scale development using the mixed methods Delphi technique |
| author_id_str_mv |
9c42fd947397b1ad2bfa9107457974d5 |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
9c42fd947397b1ad2bfa9107457974d5_***_Muneeb Ahmad |
| author |
Muneeb Ahmad |
| author2 |
Yavor Dragostinov Daney Harðardóttir Peter Edward McKenna David A. Robb Birthe Nesset Muneeb Ahmad Marta Romeo Mei Yii Lim Chuang Yu Youngkyoon Jang Mohammed Diab Angelo Cangelosi Yiannis Demiris Helen Hastie Gnanathusharan Rajendran |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
Methods in Psychology |
| container_volume |
7 |
| container_start_page |
100103 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| issn |
2590-2601 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.metip.2022.100103 |
| publisher |
Elsevier BV |
| college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| department_str |
School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2022.100103 |
| document_store_str |
1 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
This study implemented a Delphi Method; a systematic technique which relies on a panel of experts to achieve consensus, to evaluate which questionnaire items would be the most relevant for developing a new Propensity to Trust scale. Following an initial research team moderation phase, two surveys were administered to academic lecturers, professors and Ph.D. candidates specialising in the fields of either individual differences, human-robot interaction, or occupational psychology. Results from 28 experts produced 33 final questionnaire items that were deemed relevant for evaluating trust. We discuss the importance of content validity when implementing scales, while emphasising the need for more documented scale development processes in psychology. Furthermore, we propose that the Delphi technique could be utilised as an effective and economical method for achieving content validity, while also providing greater scale creation transparency. |
| published_date |
2022-12-01T05:05:55Z |
| _version_ |
1857800640055476224 |
| score |
11.096892 |

