No Cover Image

Journal article 591 views

Culture Based Development in the Regions of China

Annie Tubadji Orcid Logo

Journal of Economic Issues, Volume: 57, Issue: 1, Pages: 8 - 35

Swansea University Author: Annie Tubadji Orcid Logo

  • Accepted Manuscript under embargo until: 28th August 2024

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1080/00213624.2023.2154531

Abstract

Is culture a relevant factor for the development of the Chinese regions and is this culture different from the institutional settings of China? The Culture Based Development paradigm has been collecting evidence from the Western world about the impact of local cultural capital (a quantitative expres...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Economic Issues
ISSN: 0021-3624 1946-326X
Published: Informa UK Limited 2023
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa61608
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2022-10-20T12:24:57Z
last_indexed 2023-03-25T04:20:08Z
id cronfa61608
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2023-03-24T15:10:41.0274491</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>61608</id><entry>2022-10-20</entry><title>Culture Based Development in the Regions of China</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>f17b08e9124965486f3b5885a87b396d</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-6134-3520</ORCID><firstname>Annie</firstname><surname>Tubadji</surname><name>Annie Tubadji</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-10-20</date><deptcode>ECON</deptcode><abstract>Is culture a relevant factor for the development of the Chinese regions and is this culture different from the institutional settings of China? The Culture Based Development paradigm has been collecting evidence from the Western world about the impact of local cultural capital (a quantitative expression of culture) on the productivity of places throughout EU and US. The current paper aims to replicate the CBD approach for the first time for the institutional setting of China. It does so by using a unique panel dataset for Chinese provinces over a seven-year period (2013-2019), which contains over 60 cultural indicators and employing factor analysis, 3SLS and k-mean clustering estimation techniques. The main contribution of the paper is the distinction that it draws conceptually and empirically between culture as a proto institution and the rest of the institutional settings in a country. Revealing part of the differences and interaction between culture and institutions, this study sheds light on many important still unanswered in the economic literature questions about culture and local development in China and in a context-free (i.e. value-free) generalizable manner per se.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Economic Issues</journal><volume>57</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>8</paginationStart><paginationEnd>35</paginationEnd><publisher>Informa UK Limited</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0021-3624</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1946-326X</issnElectronic><keywords>culture, cultural capital, living culture, cultural heritage, social capital, productivity, China</keywords><publishedDay>2</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-01-02</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/00213624.2023.2154531</doi><url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2023.2154531</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Economics</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>ECON</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-03-24T15:10:41.0274491</lastEdited><Created>2022-10-20T13:21:15.4916684</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Economics</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Annie</firstname><surname>Tubadji</surname><orcid>0000-0002-6134-3520</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>Under embargo</filename><originalFilename>Under embargo</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-11-10T15:12:34.4700365</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>554512</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2024-08-28T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><documentNotes>Accepted manuscript version released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC-BY-NC)</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2023-03-24T15:10:41.0274491 v2 61608 2022-10-20 Culture Based Development in the Regions of China f17b08e9124965486f3b5885a87b396d 0000-0002-6134-3520 Annie Tubadji Annie Tubadji true false 2022-10-20 ECON Is culture a relevant factor for the development of the Chinese regions and is this culture different from the institutional settings of China? The Culture Based Development paradigm has been collecting evidence from the Western world about the impact of local cultural capital (a quantitative expression of culture) on the productivity of places throughout EU and US. The current paper aims to replicate the CBD approach for the first time for the institutional setting of China. It does so by using a unique panel dataset for Chinese provinces over a seven-year period (2013-2019), which contains over 60 cultural indicators and employing factor analysis, 3SLS and k-mean clustering estimation techniques. The main contribution of the paper is the distinction that it draws conceptually and empirically between culture as a proto institution and the rest of the institutional settings in a country. Revealing part of the differences and interaction between culture and institutions, this study sheds light on many important still unanswered in the economic literature questions about culture and local development in China and in a context-free (i.e. value-free) generalizable manner per se. Journal Article Journal of Economic Issues 57 1 8 35 Informa UK Limited 0021-3624 1946-326X culture, cultural capital, living culture, cultural heritage, social capital, productivity, China 2 1 2023 2023-01-02 10.1080/00213624.2023.2154531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2023.2154531 COLLEGE NANME Economics COLLEGE CODE ECON Swansea University 2023-03-24T15:10:41.0274491 2022-10-20T13:21:15.4916684 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Economics Annie Tubadji 0000-0002-6134-3520 1 Under embargo Under embargo 2022-11-10T15:12:34.4700365 Output 554512 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2024-08-28T00:00:00.0000000 Accepted manuscript version released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC-BY-NC) true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
title Culture Based Development in the Regions of China
spellingShingle Culture Based Development in the Regions of China
Annie Tubadji
title_short Culture Based Development in the Regions of China
title_full Culture Based Development in the Regions of China
title_fullStr Culture Based Development in the Regions of China
title_full_unstemmed Culture Based Development in the Regions of China
title_sort Culture Based Development in the Regions of China
author_id_str_mv f17b08e9124965486f3b5885a87b396d
author_id_fullname_str_mv f17b08e9124965486f3b5885a87b396d_***_Annie Tubadji
author Annie Tubadji
author2 Annie Tubadji
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Economic Issues
container_volume 57
container_issue 1
container_start_page 8
publishDate 2023
institution Swansea University
issn 0021-3624
1946-326X
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00213624.2023.2154531
publisher Informa UK Limited
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Social Sciences - Economics{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Economics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2023.2154531
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Is culture a relevant factor for the development of the Chinese regions and is this culture different from the institutional settings of China? The Culture Based Development paradigm has been collecting evidence from the Western world about the impact of local cultural capital (a quantitative expression of culture) on the productivity of places throughout EU and US. The current paper aims to replicate the CBD approach for the first time for the institutional setting of China. It does so by using a unique panel dataset for Chinese provinces over a seven-year period (2013-2019), which contains over 60 cultural indicators and employing factor analysis, 3SLS and k-mean clustering estimation techniques. The main contribution of the paper is the distinction that it draws conceptually and empirically between culture as a proto institution and the rest of the institutional settings in a country. Revealing part of the differences and interaction between culture and institutions, this study sheds light on many important still unanswered in the economic literature questions about culture and local development in China and in a context-free (i.e. value-free) generalizable manner per se.
published_date 2023-01-02T04:20:32Z
_version_ 1763754359391256576
score 11.016235

Similar Items