No Cover Image

Journal article 439 views

‘What Does This Mean?’: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human Rights

Louise Obara

Business and Human Rights Journal, Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Pages: 249 - 273

Swansea University Author: Louise Obara

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1017/bhj.2017.7

Abstract

How do companies understand and talk about human rights? Do they consider humanrights a moral, legal or political construct? What type of responsibility do they assumein respect of human rights (e.g. direct/indirect, narrow/broad)? Is the language andlabel of human rights used within day-to-day prac...

Full description

Published in: Business and Human Rights Journal
ISSN: 2057-0198 2057-0201
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2017
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa61760
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2022-11-02T14:46:00Z
last_indexed 2023-01-13T19:22:44Z
id cronfa61760
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-11-29T14:50:12.4110297</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>61760</id><entry>2022-11-02</entry><title>&#x2018;What Does This Mean?&#x2019;: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human Rights</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>d07383b968fda958fb49d7f80af2214b</sid><firstname>Louise</firstname><surname>Obara</surname><name>Louise Obara</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-11-02</date><deptcode>BAF</deptcode><abstract>How do companies understand and talk about human rights? Do they consider humanrights a moral, legal or political construct? What type of responsibility do they assumein respect of human rights (e.g. direct/indirect, narrow/broad)? Is the language andlabel of human rights used within day-to-day practice? This article attempts to addressthese questions by drawing on empirical data collected as part of an in-depth,qualitative study on the development of human rights within 22 UK companies.Through an analysis based on sensemaking, the paper explores the meaning of humanrights, the grounds used to justify corporate responsibility, and the human rightsterminology and labels employed within the corporate setting. It then analyses whatthis understanding and discourse means for the debate about the role of private entitiesfor the protection of human rights</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Business and Human Rights Journal</journal><volume>2</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>249</paginationStart><paginationEnd>273</paginationEnd><publisher>Cambridge University Press (CUP)</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>2057-0198</issnPrint><issnElectronic>2057-0201</issnElectronic><keywords>understanding, sensemaking, justification, language, UK companies</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>7</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2017</publishedYear><publishedDate>2017-07-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1017/bhj.2017.7</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Accounting and Finance</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>BAF</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Not Required</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-11-29T14:50:12.4110297</lastEdited><Created>2022-11-02T14:42:42.5062553</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Accounting and Finance</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Louise</firstname><surname>Obara</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-11-29T14:50:12.4110297 v2 61760 2022-11-02 ‘What Does This Mean?’: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human Rights d07383b968fda958fb49d7f80af2214b Louise Obara Louise Obara true false 2022-11-02 BAF How do companies understand and talk about human rights? Do they consider humanrights a moral, legal or political construct? What type of responsibility do they assumein respect of human rights (e.g. direct/indirect, narrow/broad)? Is the language andlabel of human rights used within day-to-day practice? This article attempts to addressthese questions by drawing on empirical data collected as part of an in-depth,qualitative study on the development of human rights within 22 UK companies.Through an analysis based on sensemaking, the paper explores the meaning of humanrights, the grounds used to justify corporate responsibility, and the human rightsterminology and labels employed within the corporate setting. It then analyses whatthis understanding and discourse means for the debate about the role of private entitiesfor the protection of human rights Journal Article Business and Human Rights Journal 2 2 249 273 Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2057-0198 2057-0201 understanding, sensemaking, justification, language, UK companies 1 7 2017 2017-07-01 10.1017/bhj.2017.7 COLLEGE NANME Accounting and Finance COLLEGE CODE BAF Swansea University Not Required 2022-11-29T14:50:12.4110297 2022-11-02T14:42:42.5062553 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Accounting and Finance Louise Obara 1
title ‘What Does This Mean?’: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human Rights
spellingShingle ‘What Does This Mean?’: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human Rights
Louise Obara
title_short ‘What Does This Mean?’: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human Rights
title_full ‘What Does This Mean?’: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human Rights
title_fullStr ‘What Does This Mean?’: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human Rights
title_full_unstemmed ‘What Does This Mean?’: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human Rights
title_sort ‘What Does This Mean?’: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human Rights
author_id_str_mv d07383b968fda958fb49d7f80af2214b
author_id_fullname_str_mv d07383b968fda958fb49d7f80af2214b_***_Louise Obara
author Louise Obara
author2 Louise Obara
format Journal article
container_title Business and Human Rights Journal
container_volume 2
container_issue 2
container_start_page 249
publishDate 2017
institution Swansea University
issn 2057-0198
2057-0201
doi_str_mv 10.1017/bhj.2017.7
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Management - Accounting and Finance{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Accounting and Finance
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description How do companies understand and talk about human rights? Do they consider humanrights a moral, legal or political construct? What type of responsibility do they assumein respect of human rights (e.g. direct/indirect, narrow/broad)? Is the language andlabel of human rights used within day-to-day practice? This article attempts to addressthese questions by drawing on empirical data collected as part of an in-depth,qualitative study on the development of human rights within 22 UK companies.Through an analysis based on sensemaking, the paper explores the meaning of humanrights, the grounds used to justify corporate responsibility, and the human rightsterminology and labels employed within the corporate setting. It then analyses whatthis understanding and discourse means for the debate about the role of private entitiesfor the protection of human rights
published_date 2017-07-01T04:20:49Z
_version_ 1763754377178251264
score 11.016392

Similar Items