No Cover Image

Journal article 598 views 80 downloads

Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration

Rascha J. M. Nuijten Orcid Logo, Todd E. Katzner Orcid Logo, Andrew M. Allen, Allert I. Bijleveld Orcid Logo, Tjalle Boorsma, Luca Borger Orcid Logo, Francesca Cagnacci, Tom Hart, Michelle A. Henley Orcid Logo, Richard M. Herren, Eva M. A. Kok, Bronwyn Maree, Bruno Nebe, David Shohami Orcid Logo, Susanne Marieke Vogel, Paul Walker, Ignas M. A. Heitkönig, E. J. Milner‐Gulland

Conservation Science and Practice, Volume: 5, Issue: 1

Swansea University Author: Luca Borger Orcid Logo

  • 62264.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

    Download (2.25MB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1111/csp2.12870

Abstract

Addressing ongoing biodiversity loss requires collaboration between conservation scientists and practitioners. However, such collaboration has proved challenging. Despite the potential importance of tracking animal movements for conservation, reviews of the tracking literature have identified a gap...

Full description

Published in: Conservation Science and Practice
ISSN: 2578-4854 2578-4854
Published: Wiley 2023
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa62264
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2023-01-05T08:31:56Z
last_indexed 2023-02-02T04:16:49Z
id cronfa62264
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2023-02-01T17:22:57.9542846</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>62264</id><entry>2023-01-05</entry><title>Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8763-5997</ORCID><firstname>Luca</firstname><surname>Borger</surname><name>Luca Borger</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2023-01-05</date><deptcode>SBI</deptcode><abstract>Addressing ongoing biodiversity loss requires collaboration between conservation scientists and practitioners. However, such collaboration has proved challenging. Despite the potential importance of tracking animal movements for conservation, reviews of the tracking literature have identified a gap between the academic discipline of movement ecology and its application to biodiversity conservation. Through structured conversations with movement ecologists and conservation practitioners, we aimed to understand whether the identified gap is also perceived in practice, and if so, what factors hamper collaboration and how these factors can be remediated. We found that both groups are motivated and willing to collaborate. However, because their motivations differ, there is potential for misunderstandings and miscommunications. In addition, external factors such as funder requirements, academic metrics, and journal scopes may limit the applicability of scientific results in a conservation setting. Potential solutions we identified included improved communication and better presentation of results, acknowledging each other's motivations and desired outputs, and adjustment of funder priorities. Addressing gaps between science and implementation can enhance collaboration and support conservation action to address the global biodiversity crisis more effectively.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Conservation Science and Practice</journal><volume>5</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Wiley</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>2578-4854</issnPrint><issnElectronic>2578-4854</issnElectronic><keywords>biodiversity crisis, biologging, GPS tracking, interdisciplinary collaboration, thematicanalysis, wildlife management</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-01-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1111/csp2.12870</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Biosciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SBI</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>Niels Stensen Fellowship, Grant/AwardNumber: Niels Stensen Fellowship 2021</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-02-01T17:22:57.9542846</lastEdited><Created>2023-01-05T08:27:10.7649803</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Rascha J. M.</firstname><surname>Nuijten</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1469-4328</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Todd E.</firstname><surname>Katzner</surname><orcid>0000-0003-4503-8435</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Andrew M.</firstname><surname>Allen</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Allert I.</firstname><surname>Bijleveld</surname><orcid>0000-0002-3159-8944</orcid><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Tjalle</firstname><surname>Boorsma</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Luca</firstname><surname>Borger</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8763-5997</orcid><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Francesca</firstname><surname>Cagnacci</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Tom</firstname><surname>Hart</surname><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Michelle A.</firstname><surname>Henley</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1675-7388</orcid><order>9</order></author><author><firstname>Richard M.</firstname><surname>Herren</surname><order>10</order></author><author><firstname>Eva M. A.</firstname><surname>Kok</surname><order>11</order></author><author><firstname>Bronwyn</firstname><surname>Maree</surname><order>12</order></author><author><firstname>Bruno</firstname><surname>Nebe</surname><order>13</order></author><author><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Shohami</surname><orcid>0000-0002-7147-5578</orcid><order>14</order></author><author><firstname>Susanne Marieke</firstname><surname>Vogel</surname><order>15</order></author><author><firstname>Paul</firstname><surname>Walker</surname><order>16</order></author><author><firstname>Ignas M. A.</firstname><surname>Heitk&#xF6;nig</surname><order>17</order></author><author><firstname>E. J.</firstname><surname>Milner&#x2010;Gulland</surname><order>18</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>62264__26192__8c6219ebb51f44fbbd8debf6f0686a79.pdf</filename><originalFilename>62264.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2023-01-05T08:30:55.4826346</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>2356694</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>&#xA9; 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2023-02-01T17:22:57.9542846 v2 62264 2023-01-05 Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration 8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2 0000-0001-8763-5997 Luca Borger Luca Borger true false 2023-01-05 SBI Addressing ongoing biodiversity loss requires collaboration between conservation scientists and practitioners. However, such collaboration has proved challenging. Despite the potential importance of tracking animal movements for conservation, reviews of the tracking literature have identified a gap between the academic discipline of movement ecology and its application to biodiversity conservation. Through structured conversations with movement ecologists and conservation practitioners, we aimed to understand whether the identified gap is also perceived in practice, and if so, what factors hamper collaboration and how these factors can be remediated. We found that both groups are motivated and willing to collaborate. However, because their motivations differ, there is potential for misunderstandings and miscommunications. In addition, external factors such as funder requirements, academic metrics, and journal scopes may limit the applicability of scientific results in a conservation setting. Potential solutions we identified included improved communication and better presentation of results, acknowledging each other's motivations and desired outputs, and adjustment of funder priorities. Addressing gaps between science and implementation can enhance collaboration and support conservation action to address the global biodiversity crisis more effectively. Journal Article Conservation Science and Practice 5 1 Wiley 2578-4854 2578-4854 biodiversity crisis, biologging, GPS tracking, interdisciplinary collaboration, thematicanalysis, wildlife management 1 1 2023 2023-01-01 10.1111/csp2.12870 COLLEGE NANME Biosciences COLLEGE CODE SBI Swansea University Niels Stensen Fellowship, Grant/AwardNumber: Niels Stensen Fellowship 2021 2023-02-01T17:22:57.9542846 2023-01-05T08:27:10.7649803 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences Rascha J. M. Nuijten 0000-0002-1469-4328 1 Todd E. Katzner 0000-0003-4503-8435 2 Andrew M. Allen 3 Allert I. Bijleveld 0000-0002-3159-8944 4 Tjalle Boorsma 5 Luca Borger 0000-0001-8763-5997 6 Francesca Cagnacci 7 Tom Hart 8 Michelle A. Henley 0000-0002-1675-7388 9 Richard M. Herren 10 Eva M. A. Kok 11 Bronwyn Maree 12 Bruno Nebe 13 David Shohami 0000-0002-7147-5578 14 Susanne Marieke Vogel 15 Paul Walker 16 Ignas M. A. Heitkönig 17 E. J. Milner‐Gulland 18 62264__26192__8c6219ebb51f44fbbd8debf6f0686a79.pdf 62264.pdf 2023-01-05T08:30:55.4826346 Output 2356694 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
spellingShingle Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
Luca Borger
title_short Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
title_full Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
title_fullStr Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
title_full_unstemmed Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
title_sort Priorities for translating goodwill between movement ecologists and conservation practitioners into effective collaboration
author_id_str_mv 8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2
author_id_fullname_str_mv 8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2_***_Luca Borger
author Luca Borger
author2 Rascha J. M. Nuijten
Todd E. Katzner
Andrew M. Allen
Allert I. Bijleveld
Tjalle Boorsma
Luca Borger
Francesca Cagnacci
Tom Hart
Michelle A. Henley
Richard M. Herren
Eva M. A. Kok
Bronwyn Maree
Bruno Nebe
David Shohami
Susanne Marieke Vogel
Paul Walker
Ignas M. A. Heitkönig
E. J. Milner‐Gulland
format Journal article
container_title Conservation Science and Practice
container_volume 5
container_issue 1
publishDate 2023
institution Swansea University
issn 2578-4854
2578-4854
doi_str_mv 10.1111/csp2.12870
publisher Wiley
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Addressing ongoing biodiversity loss requires collaboration between conservation scientists and practitioners. However, such collaboration has proved challenging. Despite the potential importance of tracking animal movements for conservation, reviews of the tracking literature have identified a gap between the academic discipline of movement ecology and its application to biodiversity conservation. Through structured conversations with movement ecologists and conservation practitioners, we aimed to understand whether the identified gap is also perceived in practice, and if so, what factors hamper collaboration and how these factors can be remediated. We found that both groups are motivated and willing to collaborate. However, because their motivations differ, there is potential for misunderstandings and miscommunications. In addition, external factors such as funder requirements, academic metrics, and journal scopes may limit the applicability of scientific results in a conservation setting. Potential solutions we identified included improved communication and better presentation of results, acknowledging each other's motivations and desired outputs, and adjustment of funder priorities. Addressing gaps between science and implementation can enhance collaboration and support conservation action to address the global biodiversity crisis more effectively.
published_date 2023-01-01T04:21:44Z
_version_ 1763754434610855936
score 11.036706

Similar Items