Journal article 616 views 165 downloads
The influence of surface finish and build orientation on the low cycle fatigue behaviour of laser powder bed fused stainless steel 316L
Materials Science and Engineering: A, Volume: 864, Start page: 144593
Swansea University Authors: Will Beard, Robert Lancaster , Nick Barnard
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
Download (11.69MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.msea.2023.144593
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) processes are currently under consideration for marine based components, predominantly due to the numerous benefits that the techniques have to offer over more conventional manufacturing routes. However, there are multiple engineering challenges and questions associated w...
Published in: | Materials Science and Engineering: A |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0921-5093 |
Published: |
Elsevier BV
2023
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa62265 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2023-01-05T08:45:00Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2023-02-02T04:16:49Z |
id |
cronfa62265 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2023-02-01T17:04:50.2759359</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>62265</id><entry>2023-01-05</entry><title>The influence of surface finish and build orientation on the low cycle fatigue behaviour of laser powder bed fused stainless steel 316L</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>86eea6165c3c9844b73d6e04a6228dd2</sid><firstname>Will</firstname><surname>Beard</surname><name>Will Beard</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>e1a1b126acd3e4ff734691ec34967f29</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-1365-6944</ORCID><firstname>Robert</firstname><surname>Lancaster</surname><name>Robert Lancaster</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>dc4a58e614bc6a1d99812a3acfdd9034</sid><ORCID/><firstname>Nick</firstname><surname>Barnard</surname><name>Nick Barnard</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2023-01-05</date><deptcode>FGSEN</deptcode><abstract>Additive manufacturing (AM) processes are currently under consideration for marine based components, predominantly due to the numerous benefits that the techniques have to offer over more conventional manufacturing routes. However, there are multiple engineering challenges and questions associated with the introduction of AM based parts into safety critical applications related to the mechanical behaviour of such components. One of the main factors influencing the cyclic performance of a component is the surface finish. As-built AM parts typically exhibit a rough surface owing to partially melted powder being present at the surface and the layer-by-layer nature of the AM process, which together will likely hinder the fatigue response of the component. This behaviour is further influenced by the build orientation of the AM component, with alternative orientations providing a different surface profile alongside a contrasting microstructural morphology. Therefore, alternative finishing methods have been explored to maximise the fatigue performance of components whilst also considering cost and time. This research will explore the low cycle fatigue (LCF) behaviour of laser powder bed fused (LPBF) stainless steel 316L (SS316LN) built in two principal orientations (vertical (90°) and diagonal (45°)) and subsequently subjected to several post-manufacture finishing processes in order to identify the optimal finish for mechanical performance. The mechanical results are supported by microstructural, fractographic and advanced surface profilometry assessments, which have revealed that surface roughness can not be considered alone to be the controlling influence on LCF behaviour. An as-built surface finish will inherently provide a greater number of surface breaking stress raisers, however, a novel mass finishing polishing procedure has been found to produce a similar effective stress concentration factor compared to conventional longitudinal polishing, offering a more viable and less time consuming alternative. Several other key factors must also be considered when assessing the fatigue performance of LPBF built materials, including build direction and the resulting grain orientation, density of the additive structure and the material's sensitivity to the presence of notched features at the surface. Finally, the generated mechanical data has also been interpreted through empirical modelling, and the various data sets have been successfully correlated to enable longer fatigue life predictions.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Materials Science and Engineering: A</journal><volume>864</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>144593</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0921-5093</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Laser powder bed fusion, Low cycle fatigue, Stainless steel 316L, Surface roughness, Build orientation</keywords><publishedDay>5</publishedDay><publishedMonth>2</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-02-05</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.msea.2023.144593</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Science and Engineering - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGSEN</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal)</apcterm><funders>EPSRC, EP/H500383/1,EP/H022309/1</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-02-01T17:04:50.2759359</lastEdited><Created>2023-01-05T08:42:56.5892097</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Will</firstname><surname>Beard</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Robert</firstname><surname>Lancaster</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1365-6944</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Nick</firstname><surname>Barnard</surname><orcid/><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Thomas</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Jack</firstname><surname>Adams</surname><order>5</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>62265__26208__866c2b60aecd4447a3bcda09e0ed5e38.pdf</filename><originalFilename>62265.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2023-01-09T10:11:34.6709721</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>12254986</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2023-02-01T17:04:50.2759359 v2 62265 2023-01-05 The influence of surface finish and build orientation on the low cycle fatigue behaviour of laser powder bed fused stainless steel 316L 86eea6165c3c9844b73d6e04a6228dd2 Will Beard Will Beard true false e1a1b126acd3e4ff734691ec34967f29 0000-0002-1365-6944 Robert Lancaster Robert Lancaster true false dc4a58e614bc6a1d99812a3acfdd9034 Nick Barnard Nick Barnard true false 2023-01-05 FGSEN Additive manufacturing (AM) processes are currently under consideration for marine based components, predominantly due to the numerous benefits that the techniques have to offer over more conventional manufacturing routes. However, there are multiple engineering challenges and questions associated with the introduction of AM based parts into safety critical applications related to the mechanical behaviour of such components. One of the main factors influencing the cyclic performance of a component is the surface finish. As-built AM parts typically exhibit a rough surface owing to partially melted powder being present at the surface and the layer-by-layer nature of the AM process, which together will likely hinder the fatigue response of the component. This behaviour is further influenced by the build orientation of the AM component, with alternative orientations providing a different surface profile alongside a contrasting microstructural morphology. Therefore, alternative finishing methods have been explored to maximise the fatigue performance of components whilst also considering cost and time. This research will explore the low cycle fatigue (LCF) behaviour of laser powder bed fused (LPBF) stainless steel 316L (SS316LN) built in two principal orientations (vertical (90°) and diagonal (45°)) and subsequently subjected to several post-manufacture finishing processes in order to identify the optimal finish for mechanical performance. The mechanical results are supported by microstructural, fractographic and advanced surface profilometry assessments, which have revealed that surface roughness can not be considered alone to be the controlling influence on LCF behaviour. An as-built surface finish will inherently provide a greater number of surface breaking stress raisers, however, a novel mass finishing polishing procedure has been found to produce a similar effective stress concentration factor compared to conventional longitudinal polishing, offering a more viable and less time consuming alternative. Several other key factors must also be considered when assessing the fatigue performance of LPBF built materials, including build direction and the resulting grain orientation, density of the additive structure and the material's sensitivity to the presence of notched features at the surface. Finally, the generated mechanical data has also been interpreted through empirical modelling, and the various data sets have been successfully correlated to enable longer fatigue life predictions. Journal Article Materials Science and Engineering: A 864 144593 Elsevier BV 0921-5093 Laser powder bed fusion, Low cycle fatigue, Stainless steel 316L, Surface roughness, Build orientation 5 2 2023 2023-02-05 10.1016/j.msea.2023.144593 COLLEGE NANME Science and Engineering - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGSEN Swansea University SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal) EPSRC, EP/H500383/1,EP/H022309/1 2023-02-01T17:04:50.2759359 2023-01-05T08:42:56.5892097 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering Will Beard 1 Robert Lancaster 0000-0002-1365-6944 2 Nick Barnard 3 Thomas Jones 4 Jack Adams 5 62265__26208__866c2b60aecd4447a3bcda09e0ed5e38.pdf 62265.pdf 2023-01-09T10:11:34.6709721 Output 12254986 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2023 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
The influence of surface finish and build orientation on the low cycle fatigue behaviour of laser powder bed fused stainless steel 316L |
spellingShingle |
The influence of surface finish and build orientation on the low cycle fatigue behaviour of laser powder bed fused stainless steel 316L Will Beard Robert Lancaster Nick Barnard |
title_short |
The influence of surface finish and build orientation on the low cycle fatigue behaviour of laser powder bed fused stainless steel 316L |
title_full |
The influence of surface finish and build orientation on the low cycle fatigue behaviour of laser powder bed fused stainless steel 316L |
title_fullStr |
The influence of surface finish and build orientation on the low cycle fatigue behaviour of laser powder bed fused stainless steel 316L |
title_full_unstemmed |
The influence of surface finish and build orientation on the low cycle fatigue behaviour of laser powder bed fused stainless steel 316L |
title_sort |
The influence of surface finish and build orientation on the low cycle fatigue behaviour of laser powder bed fused stainless steel 316L |
author_id_str_mv |
86eea6165c3c9844b73d6e04a6228dd2 e1a1b126acd3e4ff734691ec34967f29 dc4a58e614bc6a1d99812a3acfdd9034 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
86eea6165c3c9844b73d6e04a6228dd2_***_Will Beard e1a1b126acd3e4ff734691ec34967f29_***_Robert Lancaster dc4a58e614bc6a1d99812a3acfdd9034_***_Nick Barnard |
author |
Will Beard Robert Lancaster Nick Barnard |
author2 |
Will Beard Robert Lancaster Nick Barnard Thomas Jones Jack Adams |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Materials Science and Engineering: A |
container_volume |
864 |
container_start_page |
144593 |
publishDate |
2023 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0921-5093 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.msea.2023.144593 |
publisher |
Elsevier BV |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Additive manufacturing (AM) processes are currently under consideration for marine based components, predominantly due to the numerous benefits that the techniques have to offer over more conventional manufacturing routes. However, there are multiple engineering challenges and questions associated with the introduction of AM based parts into safety critical applications related to the mechanical behaviour of such components. One of the main factors influencing the cyclic performance of a component is the surface finish. As-built AM parts typically exhibit a rough surface owing to partially melted powder being present at the surface and the layer-by-layer nature of the AM process, which together will likely hinder the fatigue response of the component. This behaviour is further influenced by the build orientation of the AM component, with alternative orientations providing a different surface profile alongside a contrasting microstructural morphology. Therefore, alternative finishing methods have been explored to maximise the fatigue performance of components whilst also considering cost and time. This research will explore the low cycle fatigue (LCF) behaviour of laser powder bed fused (LPBF) stainless steel 316L (SS316LN) built in two principal orientations (vertical (90°) and diagonal (45°)) and subsequently subjected to several post-manufacture finishing processes in order to identify the optimal finish for mechanical performance. The mechanical results are supported by microstructural, fractographic and advanced surface profilometry assessments, which have revealed that surface roughness can not be considered alone to be the controlling influence on LCF behaviour. An as-built surface finish will inherently provide a greater number of surface breaking stress raisers, however, a novel mass finishing polishing procedure has been found to produce a similar effective stress concentration factor compared to conventional longitudinal polishing, offering a more viable and less time consuming alternative. Several other key factors must also be considered when assessing the fatigue performance of LPBF built materials, including build direction and the resulting grain orientation, density of the additive structure and the material's sensitivity to the presence of notched features at the surface. Finally, the generated mechanical data has also been interpreted through empirical modelling, and the various data sets have been successfully correlated to enable longer fatigue life predictions. |
published_date |
2023-02-05T04:21:44Z |
_version_ |
1763754434734587904 |
score |
11.033112 |