Journal article 523 views 107 downloads
Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Largescale Comparative Analysis of Extreme Right and Jihadi Online Text(s)
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Pages: 1 - 24
Swansea University Author: Maura Conway
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2022 The Author(s). Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Download (1.6MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1080/1057610x.2022.2071712
Abstract
This article describes and discusses a comparative semiotic analysis of online text collected from eight extreme right websites and four violent jihadi groups’ online magazines. The two datasets, which comprise just over 1 million words each, were analyzed using LIWC software. The core issues explor...
Published in: | Studies in Conflict and Terrorism |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1057-610X 1521-0731 |
Published: |
Informa UK Limited
2022
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa62898 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2023-03-10T11:00:23Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2023-03-11T04:14:50Z |
id |
cronfa62898 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>62898</id><entry>2023-03-10</entry><title>Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Largescale Comparative Analysis of Extreme Right and Jihadi Online Text(s)</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>a85f1f79fa2041b345e47eb55062d1b7</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-4216-8592</ORCID><firstname>Maura</firstname><surname>Conway</surname><name>Maura Conway</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2023-03-10</date><deptcode>HRCL</deptcode><abstract>This article describes and discusses a comparative semiotic analysis of online text collected from eight extreme right websites and four violent jihadi groups’ online magazines. The two datasets, which comprise just over 1 million words each, were analyzed using LIWC software. The core issues explored were the shared and different linguistic patterns used among extreme right and violent jihadi extremists and the emotional, cognitive, psychological, and social dimensions of the online textual discourses of each ideological grouping and what function these played in their overall political rhetoric. The findings bring to light some nuanced differences and similarities in the cognitive, social, psychological, and temporal dimensions of language used by each. For example, while both types of ideological text showed the same level of certainty in arguments as a cognitive process, the language depicting social and emotional processes, and religion were used more often by the violent jihadi extremists (VJEs) than the extreme right. The findings also point to the fact that VJEs were more likely than right-wing extremists to discuss the future and promise change as motivational incentives.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Studies in Conflict and Terrorism</journal><volume>0</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>1</paginationStart><paginationEnd>24</paginationEnd><publisher>Informa UK Limited</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1057-610X</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1521-0731</issnElectronic><keywords>Extreme right, violent jihadi extremists, LIWC software, online discourse</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>8</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2022</publishedYear><publishedDate>2022-08-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/1057610x.2022.2071712</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HRCL</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>This work was partially supported by the Minerva Research Initiative of the U.S. Department
of Defense, through the Air Force Office of Scientific Research as part of the Mobilizing Media
research program (Grant# FA9550-15-1-0373; Anthony F. Lemieux, PI); the European Union’s
Framework Program 7 as part of the VOX-Pol Network of Excellence (Grant# 312827: Maura
Conway, PI); and Swansea University’s Legal Innovation Lab Wales, which is part-funded by
the European Regional Development Fund through the Welsh government under Grant 82123.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-09-19T10:25:54.1184257</lastEdited><Created>2023-03-10T10:57:51.5324819</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Weeda</firstname><surname>Mehran</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0207-919x</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Stephen</firstname><surname>Herron</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Ben</firstname><surname>Miller</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Anthony F.</firstname><surname>Lemieux</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Maura</firstname><surname>Conway</surname><orcid>0000-0003-4216-8592</orcid><order>5</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>62898__26802__36b4b73afa0d4f839e6d3a5f3aa07fd5.pdf</filename><originalFilename>62898_VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2023-03-10T11:00:41.6192117</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1680163</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2022 The Author(s). Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
v2 62898 2023-03-10 Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Largescale Comparative Analysis of Extreme Right and Jihadi Online Text(s) a85f1f79fa2041b345e47eb55062d1b7 0000-0003-4216-8592 Maura Conway Maura Conway true false 2023-03-10 HRCL This article describes and discusses a comparative semiotic analysis of online text collected from eight extreme right websites and four violent jihadi groups’ online magazines. The two datasets, which comprise just over 1 million words each, were analyzed using LIWC software. The core issues explored were the shared and different linguistic patterns used among extreme right and violent jihadi extremists and the emotional, cognitive, psychological, and social dimensions of the online textual discourses of each ideological grouping and what function these played in their overall political rhetoric. The findings bring to light some nuanced differences and similarities in the cognitive, social, psychological, and temporal dimensions of language used by each. For example, while both types of ideological text showed the same level of certainty in arguments as a cognitive process, the language depicting social and emotional processes, and religion were used more often by the violent jihadi extremists (VJEs) than the extreme right. The findings also point to the fact that VJEs were more likely than right-wing extremists to discuss the future and promise change as motivational incentives. Journal Article Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 0 1 24 Informa UK Limited 1057-610X 1521-0731 Extreme right, violent jihadi extremists, LIWC software, online discourse 1 8 2022 2022-08-01 10.1080/1057610x.2022.2071712 COLLEGE NANME Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School COLLEGE CODE HRCL Swansea University This work was partially supported by the Minerva Research Initiative of the U.S. Department of Defense, through the Air Force Office of Scientific Research as part of the Mobilizing Media research program (Grant# FA9550-15-1-0373; Anthony F. Lemieux, PI); the European Union’s Framework Program 7 as part of the VOX-Pol Network of Excellence (Grant# 312827: Maura Conway, PI); and Swansea University’s Legal Innovation Lab Wales, which is part-funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Welsh government under Grant 82123. 2024-09-19T10:25:54.1184257 2023-03-10T10:57:51.5324819 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Weeda Mehran 0000-0003-0207-919x 1 Stephen Herron 2 Ben Miller 3 Anthony F. Lemieux 4 Maura Conway 0000-0003-4216-8592 5 62898__26802__36b4b73afa0d4f839e6d3a5f3aa07fd5.pdf 62898_VoR.pdf 2023-03-10T11:00:41.6192117 Output 1680163 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2022 The Author(s). Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
title |
Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Largescale Comparative Analysis of Extreme Right and Jihadi Online Text(s) |
spellingShingle |
Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Largescale Comparative Analysis of Extreme Right and Jihadi Online Text(s) Maura Conway |
title_short |
Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Largescale Comparative Analysis of Extreme Right and Jihadi Online Text(s) |
title_full |
Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Largescale Comparative Analysis of Extreme Right and Jihadi Online Text(s) |
title_fullStr |
Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Largescale Comparative Analysis of Extreme Right and Jihadi Online Text(s) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Largescale Comparative Analysis of Extreme Right and Jihadi Online Text(s) |
title_sort |
Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Largescale Comparative Analysis of Extreme Right and Jihadi Online Text(s) |
author_id_str_mv |
a85f1f79fa2041b345e47eb55062d1b7 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
a85f1f79fa2041b345e47eb55062d1b7_***_Maura Conway |
author |
Maura Conway |
author2 |
Weeda Mehran Stephen Herron Ben Miller Anthony F. Lemieux Maura Conway |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism |
container_volume |
0 |
container_start_page |
1 |
publishDate |
2022 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
1057-610X 1521-0731 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1080/1057610x.2022.2071712 |
publisher |
Informa UK Limited |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
This article describes and discusses a comparative semiotic analysis of online text collected from eight extreme right websites and four violent jihadi groups’ online magazines. The two datasets, which comprise just over 1 million words each, were analyzed using LIWC software. The core issues explored were the shared and different linguistic patterns used among extreme right and violent jihadi extremists and the emotional, cognitive, psychological, and social dimensions of the online textual discourses of each ideological grouping and what function these played in their overall political rhetoric. The findings bring to light some nuanced differences and similarities in the cognitive, social, psychological, and temporal dimensions of language used by each. For example, while both types of ideological text showed the same level of certainty in arguments as a cognitive process, the language depicting social and emotional processes, and religion were used more often by the violent jihadi extremists (VJEs) than the extreme right. The findings also point to the fact that VJEs were more likely than right-wing extremists to discuss the future and promise change as motivational incentives. |
published_date |
2022-08-01T10:25:54Z |
_version_ |
1810615977531932672 |
score |
11.035393 |