No Cover Image

E-Thesis 241 views

The Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Laser Powder Bed Fused Stainless Steel 316LN: Build Orientation and Surface Finish Effects / WILLIAM BEARD

Swansea University Author: WILLIAM BEARD

  • E-Thesis under embargo until: 22nd May 2028

DOI (Published version): 10.23889/SUthesis.63640

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a rapidly growing technology which is extending its influence into many industrial sectors such as aerospace, automotive and marine. Recently the nuclear sector has considered AM in the production of nuclear reactor components due to its possible advantages over conven...

Full description

Published: Swansea, Wales, UK 2023
Institution: Swansea University
Degree level: Doctoral
Degree name: EngD
Supervisor: Lancaster, Robert.
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa63640
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2023-06-13T14:36:27Z
last_indexed 2023-06-13T14:36:27Z
id cronfa63640
recordtype RisThesis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>63640</id><entry>2023-06-13</entry><title>The Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Laser Powder Bed Fused Stainless Steel 316LN: Build Orientation and Surface Finish Effects</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>421fa836cb5f7a2abca872f38f1fdae8</sid><firstname>WILLIAM</firstname><surname>BEARD</surname><name>WILLIAM BEARD</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2023-06-13</date><abstract>Additive manufacturing (AM) is a rapidly growing technology which is extending its influence into many industrial sectors such as aerospace, automotive and marine. Recently the nuclear sector has considered AM in the production of nuclear reactor components due to its possible advantages over conventional manufacturing routes. This includes considerable cost savings due to less material wastage, the ability to produce complex near net shape components that conventional manufacturing processes are unable to achieve and a reduced manufacturing time. Initially, Stainless Steel 316LN (SS316LN) manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) has been identified as a potential candidate. However, there are multiple engineering challenges and questions associated with the introduction of LPBF parts into safety critical applications relating to the inherent processing defects, transient nature of the microstructure and rough surface finish which affect the subsequent mechanical behaviour of LPBF components. One of the main factors influencing a component’s cyclic performance is the surface finish. As-built LPBF parts exhibit a rough surface finish due to the layer-by-layer nature of the AM process, which will in turn typically hinder the cyclic response of the component. This behaviour is further influenced by the build orientation of the AM component, with alternative orientations providing a different surface profile alongside a contrasting microstructural morphology. Therefore, alternative finishing methods have been explored to maximise the component’s fatigue performance whilst also considering cost and time. This study will first explore the Low Cycle Fatigue (LCF) behaviour of LPBF SS316LN built in three principal build orientations (vertical (90°), horizontal (0°) and diagonal (45°)) subjected to a conventional polishing procedure to identify the effects of build orientation on the mechanical performance. In addition to this, the LCF behaviour of LPBF SS316LN built in two principal directions (vertical (90°) and diagonal (45°)) with several post-manufacture finishing processes will be assessed to identify the optimal finish for mechanical performance. The LCF results are supported by various microstructural, fractographic and advanced surface profilometry assessments.The LCF results alongside various microstructural, fractographic and advanced surface profilometry findings have revealed that surface roughness alone can not be considered to be the controlling influence on LCF behaviour. An as-built surface finish will inherently provide a greater number of surface breaking stress raisers, however, a novel Rösler mass finishing polishing procedure has been found to produce a similar effective stress concentration factor compared to conventional longitudinal polishing, offering a more viable and less time consuming alternative. Several other key factors must also be considered when assessing the fatigue performance of LPBF built materials, including build direction and the resulting grain orientation, density of the additive structure and the material’s sensitivity to the presence of notched features at the surface. The LCF build orientation results revealed that the vertical (90°) orientation displayed the longest fatigue lives whilst the diagonal (45°) material displayed the shortest lives. Finally, the generated mechanical data has also been interpreted through empirical modelling, and the various data sets have been successfully correlated to enable fatigue life predictions outside the testing regimes.</abstract><type>E-Thesis</type><journal/><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication>Swansea, Wales, UK</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Stainless Steel 316LN,Strain Control Low Cycle Fatigue, Surface Finish, Build Orientation</keywords><publishedDay>22</publishedDay><publishedMonth>5</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-05-22</publishedDate><doi>10.23889/SUthesis.63640</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><supervisor>Lancaster, Robert.</supervisor><degreelevel>Doctoral</degreelevel><degreename>EngD</degreename><degreesponsorsfunders>M2A, Welsh Social Fund, Rolls-Royce</degreesponsorsfunders><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-10-03T15:47:13.7914934</lastEdited><Created>2023-06-13T15:33:22.2710241</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering</level></path><authors><author><firstname>WILLIAM</firstname><surname>BEARD</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>Under embargo</filename><originalFilename>Under embargo</originalFilename><uploaded>2023-06-13T15:37:32.0601526</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>12571336</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>E-Thesis</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2028-05-22T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><documentNotes>Copyright: The Author, William P. Beard, 2023.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling v2 63640 2023-06-13 The Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Laser Powder Bed Fused Stainless Steel 316LN: Build Orientation and Surface Finish Effects 421fa836cb5f7a2abca872f38f1fdae8 WILLIAM BEARD WILLIAM BEARD true false 2023-06-13 Additive manufacturing (AM) is a rapidly growing technology which is extending its influence into many industrial sectors such as aerospace, automotive and marine. Recently the nuclear sector has considered AM in the production of nuclear reactor components due to its possible advantages over conventional manufacturing routes. This includes considerable cost savings due to less material wastage, the ability to produce complex near net shape components that conventional manufacturing processes are unable to achieve and a reduced manufacturing time. Initially, Stainless Steel 316LN (SS316LN) manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) has been identified as a potential candidate. However, there are multiple engineering challenges and questions associated with the introduction of LPBF parts into safety critical applications relating to the inherent processing defects, transient nature of the microstructure and rough surface finish which affect the subsequent mechanical behaviour of LPBF components. One of the main factors influencing a component’s cyclic performance is the surface finish. As-built LPBF parts exhibit a rough surface finish due to the layer-by-layer nature of the AM process, which will in turn typically hinder the cyclic response of the component. This behaviour is further influenced by the build orientation of the AM component, with alternative orientations providing a different surface profile alongside a contrasting microstructural morphology. Therefore, alternative finishing methods have been explored to maximise the component’s fatigue performance whilst also considering cost and time. This study will first explore the Low Cycle Fatigue (LCF) behaviour of LPBF SS316LN built in three principal build orientations (vertical (90°), horizontal (0°) and diagonal (45°)) subjected to a conventional polishing procedure to identify the effects of build orientation on the mechanical performance. In addition to this, the LCF behaviour of LPBF SS316LN built in two principal directions (vertical (90°) and diagonal (45°)) with several post-manufacture finishing processes will be assessed to identify the optimal finish for mechanical performance. The LCF results are supported by various microstructural, fractographic and advanced surface profilometry assessments.The LCF results alongside various microstructural, fractographic and advanced surface profilometry findings have revealed that surface roughness alone can not be considered to be the controlling influence on LCF behaviour. An as-built surface finish will inherently provide a greater number of surface breaking stress raisers, however, a novel Rösler mass finishing polishing procedure has been found to produce a similar effective stress concentration factor compared to conventional longitudinal polishing, offering a more viable and less time consuming alternative. Several other key factors must also be considered when assessing the fatigue performance of LPBF built materials, including build direction and the resulting grain orientation, density of the additive structure and the material’s sensitivity to the presence of notched features at the surface. The LCF build orientation results revealed that the vertical (90°) orientation displayed the longest fatigue lives whilst the diagonal (45°) material displayed the shortest lives. Finally, the generated mechanical data has also been interpreted through empirical modelling, and the various data sets have been successfully correlated to enable fatigue life predictions outside the testing regimes. E-Thesis Swansea, Wales, UK Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Stainless Steel 316LN,Strain Control Low Cycle Fatigue, Surface Finish, Build Orientation 22 5 2023 2023-05-22 10.23889/SUthesis.63640 COLLEGE NANME COLLEGE CODE Swansea University Lancaster, Robert. Doctoral EngD M2A, Welsh Social Fund, Rolls-Royce 2023-10-03T15:47:13.7914934 2023-06-13T15:33:22.2710241 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering WILLIAM BEARD 1 Under embargo Under embargo 2023-06-13T15:37:32.0601526 Output 12571336 application/pdf E-Thesis true 2028-05-22T00:00:00.0000000 Copyright: The Author, William P. Beard, 2023. true eng
title The Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Laser Powder Bed Fused Stainless Steel 316LN: Build Orientation and Surface Finish Effects
spellingShingle The Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Laser Powder Bed Fused Stainless Steel 316LN: Build Orientation and Surface Finish Effects
WILLIAM BEARD
title_short The Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Laser Powder Bed Fused Stainless Steel 316LN: Build Orientation and Surface Finish Effects
title_full The Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Laser Powder Bed Fused Stainless Steel 316LN: Build Orientation and Surface Finish Effects
title_fullStr The Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Laser Powder Bed Fused Stainless Steel 316LN: Build Orientation and Surface Finish Effects
title_full_unstemmed The Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Laser Powder Bed Fused Stainless Steel 316LN: Build Orientation and Surface Finish Effects
title_sort The Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of Laser Powder Bed Fused Stainless Steel 316LN: Build Orientation and Surface Finish Effects
author_id_str_mv 421fa836cb5f7a2abca872f38f1fdae8
author_id_fullname_str_mv 421fa836cb5f7a2abca872f38f1fdae8_***_WILLIAM BEARD
author WILLIAM BEARD
author2 WILLIAM BEARD
format E-Thesis
publishDate 2023
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.23889/SUthesis.63640
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Additive manufacturing (AM) is a rapidly growing technology which is extending its influence into many industrial sectors such as aerospace, automotive and marine. Recently the nuclear sector has considered AM in the production of nuclear reactor components due to its possible advantages over conventional manufacturing routes. This includes considerable cost savings due to less material wastage, the ability to produce complex near net shape components that conventional manufacturing processes are unable to achieve and a reduced manufacturing time. Initially, Stainless Steel 316LN (SS316LN) manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) has been identified as a potential candidate. However, there are multiple engineering challenges and questions associated with the introduction of LPBF parts into safety critical applications relating to the inherent processing defects, transient nature of the microstructure and rough surface finish which affect the subsequent mechanical behaviour of LPBF components. One of the main factors influencing a component’s cyclic performance is the surface finish. As-built LPBF parts exhibit a rough surface finish due to the layer-by-layer nature of the AM process, which will in turn typically hinder the cyclic response of the component. This behaviour is further influenced by the build orientation of the AM component, with alternative orientations providing a different surface profile alongside a contrasting microstructural morphology. Therefore, alternative finishing methods have been explored to maximise the component’s fatigue performance whilst also considering cost and time. This study will first explore the Low Cycle Fatigue (LCF) behaviour of LPBF SS316LN built in three principal build orientations (vertical (90°), horizontal (0°) and diagonal (45°)) subjected to a conventional polishing procedure to identify the effects of build orientation on the mechanical performance. In addition to this, the LCF behaviour of LPBF SS316LN built in two principal directions (vertical (90°) and diagonal (45°)) with several post-manufacture finishing processes will be assessed to identify the optimal finish for mechanical performance. The LCF results are supported by various microstructural, fractographic and advanced surface profilometry assessments.The LCF results alongside various microstructural, fractographic and advanced surface profilometry findings have revealed that surface roughness alone can not be considered to be the controlling influence on LCF behaviour. An as-built surface finish will inherently provide a greater number of surface breaking stress raisers, however, a novel Rösler mass finishing polishing procedure has been found to produce a similar effective stress concentration factor compared to conventional longitudinal polishing, offering a more viable and less time consuming alternative. Several other key factors must also be considered when assessing the fatigue performance of LPBF built materials, including build direction and the resulting grain orientation, density of the additive structure and the material’s sensitivity to the presence of notched features at the surface. The LCF build orientation results revealed that the vertical (90°) orientation displayed the longest fatigue lives whilst the diagonal (45°) material displayed the shortest lives. Finally, the generated mechanical data has also been interpreted through empirical modelling, and the various data sets have been successfully correlated to enable fatigue life predictions outside the testing regimes.
published_date 2023-05-22T15:47:15Z
_version_ 1778746062506295296
score 11.016258

Similar Items