No Cover Image

Journal article 429 views

Amsterdam 2022 process: A summary of the methodology for the Amsterdam International Consensus on Concussion in Sport

Kathryn J Schneider Orcid Logo, Jon S Patricios Orcid Logo, Willem Meeuwisse, Geoff M Schneider, K Alix Hayden Orcid Logo, Zahra Premji Orcid Logo, Osman Hassan Ahmed Orcid Logo, Cheri Blauwet Orcid Logo, Steven Broglio Orcid Logo, Robert C Cantu, Gavin A Davis Orcid Logo, Jiri Dvorak Orcid Logo, Ruben J Echemendia Orcid Logo, Carolyn A Emery Orcid Logo, Grant L Iverson Orcid Logo, John J Leddy Orcid Logo, Michael Makdissi, Michael McCrea Orcid Logo, Michael McNamee Orcid Logo, Margot Putukian Orcid Logo, Keith Owen Yeates Orcid Logo, Amanda M Black Orcid Logo, Joel S Burma Orcid Logo, Meghan Critchley, Paul H Eliason Orcid Logo, Anu M Räisänen Orcid Logo, Jason B Tabor Orcid Logo, Clodagh Toomey, Paul E Ronksley, J David Cassidy

British Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume: 57, Issue: 11, Pages: 712 - 721

Swansea University Author: Michael McNamee Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to summarise the consensus methodology that was used to inform the International Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport (Amsterdam 2022). Building on a Delphi process to inform the questions and outcomes from the 5th International Conference on Concussion in Sport, t...

Full description

Published in: British Journal of Sports Medicine
ISSN: 0306-3674 1473-0480
Published: BMJ 2023
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa63687
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to summarise the consensus methodology that was used to inform the International Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport (Amsterdam 2022). Building on a Delphi process to inform the questions and outcomes from the 5th International Conference on Concussion in Sport, the Scientific Committee identified key questions, the answers to which would help encapsulate the current science in sport-related concussion and help guide clinical practice. Over 3½ years, delayed by 2 years due to the pandemic, author groups conducted systematic reviews on each selected topic. The 6th International Conference on Concussion in Sport was held in Amsterdam (27–30 October 2022) and consisted of 2 days of systematic review presentations, panel discussions, question and answer engagement with the 600 attendees, and abstract presentations. This was followed by a closed third day of consensus deliberations by an expert panel of 29 with observers in attendance. The fourth day, also closed, was dedicated to a workshop to discuss and refine the sports concussion tools (Concussion Recognition Tool 6 (CRT6), Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 6 (SCAT6), Child SCAT6, Sport Concussion Office Assessment Tool 6 (SCOAT6) and Child SCOAT6). We include a summary of recommendations for methodological improvements for future research that grew out of the systematic reviews.
Item Description: Discussion
College: Faculty of Science and Engineering
Funders: Educational grant from the Concussion in Sport International Consensus Conference Organizing Committee through Publi Creations for partial administrative and operational costs associated with the writing of the systematic reviews.
Issue: 11
Start Page: 712
End Page: 721