Journal article 284 views 45 downloads
ConGam-PS: developing and evaluating a measurement tool of treatment providers’ views about contingency management for gambling
Addiction Research & Theory, Pages: 1 - 10
Swansea University Author:
Simon Dymond
-
PDF | Version of Record
c2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
Download (1.2MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1080/16066359.2023.2247978
Abstract
Contingency management (CM) is an evidence-based behavioral intervention highly effective at promoting behavior change. Despite evidence of its efficacy, the extension of CM to the treatment of harmful gambling has been slow. Wider dissemination of CM may be facilitated through identification of per...
| Published in: | Addiction Research & Theory |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1606-6359 1476-7392 |
| Published: |
Informa UK Limited
2023
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa64154 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract: |
Contingency management (CM) is an evidence-based behavioral intervention highly effective at promoting behavior change. Despite evidence of its efficacy, the extension of CM to the treatment of harmful gambling has been slow. Wider dissemination of CM may be facilitated through identification of perceived obstacles and barriers. The present study developed items for a new scale, the Contingency Management for Gambling Provider Survey(ConGam-PS), to measure the views of gambling treatment providers of CM for gambling. In a mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) based approach,N¼111 UK gambling treatment providers were surveyed about their positive, negative, and neutral beliefs about CM. Descriptive analyses found that participants were open to using and receiving training in CM, and supported research on CM for treatment of gambling. Common concerns involved the potential negative consequences for clients when incentives are withdrawn and the feasibility of objectively verifying gambling abstinence. No significant associations were found between participant characteristics and CM beliefs. Overall, there is openness toward CM among treatment providers and further research and evaluation of CM for harmful gambling is warranted. |
|---|---|
| College: |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| Funders: |
GambleAware |
| Start Page: |
1 |
| End Page: |
10 |