No Cover Image

Book chapter 313 views

Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research

Cornelia Tschichold Orcid Logo, Alex Boulton, Pascual Pérez-Paredes

Developing Feedback Literacy for Academic Journal Peer Review

Swansea University Author: Cornelia Tschichold Orcid Logo

Abstract

Peer review has been the subject of a number of academic publications, typically focusing on the reviewer’s perspective with the aim of promoting more helpful evaluations. By contrast, the present chapter takes an alternative view in defining the feedback literacy of authors who submit a manuscript...

Full description

Published in: Developing Feedback Literacy for Academic Journal Peer Review
Published: Routledge
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa64454
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2023-09-07T11:31:02Z
last_indexed 2023-09-07T11:31:02Z
id cronfa64454
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>64454</id><entry>2023-09-07</entry><title>Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7ab58ba7c36c98911ed94a11fc7e5cb2</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8487-2209</ORCID><firstname>Cornelia</firstname><surname>Tschichold</surname><name>Cornelia Tschichold</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2023-09-07</date><deptcode>APLI</deptcode><abstract>Peer review has been the subject of a number of academic publications, typically focusing on the reviewer’s perspective with the aim of promoting more helpful evaluations. By contrast, the present chapter takes an alternative view in defining the feedback literacy of authors who submit a manuscript to a journal. Basing the study on our involvement in a top-level journal in applied linguistics, we examine the submissions and the procedures, noting common problems along the way. We then draw on a 500,000-word corpus of reviews to select exemplars, adopting a case-study approach first of unsuccessful and then of successful submissions for more detailed examination. These exemplify both the cyclical process of reviewing and revising a manuscript and the conversations that take place between authors and reviewers. The aim of this chapter is twofold: to provide advice for all stages of the reviewing process and to contribute to the growing literature on feedback literacy by promoting reflective practices of those stakeholders involved in the process of submission and publication.</abstract><type>Book chapter</type><journal>Developing Feedback Literacy for Academic Journal Peer Review</journal><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Routledge</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>0</publishedDay><publishedMonth>0</publishedMonth><publishedYear>0</publishedYear><publishedDate>0001-01-01</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Applied Linguistics</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>APLI</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Not Required</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-09-07T12:31:00.6982947</lastEdited><Created>2023-09-07T12:19:06.9669818</Created><path><level id="1">College of Arts and Humanities</level><level id="2">Department of Applied Linguistics</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Cornelia</firstname><surname>Tschichold</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8487-2209</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Alex</firstname><surname>Boulton</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Pascual</firstname><surname>Pérez-Paredes</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling v2 64454 2023-09-07 Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research 7ab58ba7c36c98911ed94a11fc7e5cb2 0000-0001-8487-2209 Cornelia Tschichold Cornelia Tschichold true false 2023-09-07 APLI Peer review has been the subject of a number of academic publications, typically focusing on the reviewer’s perspective with the aim of promoting more helpful evaluations. By contrast, the present chapter takes an alternative view in defining the feedback literacy of authors who submit a manuscript to a journal. Basing the study on our involvement in a top-level journal in applied linguistics, we examine the submissions and the procedures, noting common problems along the way. We then draw on a 500,000-word corpus of reviews to select exemplars, adopting a case-study approach first of unsuccessful and then of successful submissions for more detailed examination. These exemplify both the cyclical process of reviewing and revising a manuscript and the conversations that take place between authors and reviewers. The aim of this chapter is twofold: to provide advice for all stages of the reviewing process and to contribute to the growing literature on feedback literacy by promoting reflective practices of those stakeholders involved in the process of submission and publication. Book chapter Developing Feedback Literacy for Academic Journal Peer Review Routledge 0 0 0 0001-01-01 COLLEGE NANME Applied Linguistics COLLEGE CODE APLI Swansea University Not Required 2023-09-07T12:31:00.6982947 2023-09-07T12:19:06.9669818 College of Arts and Humanities Department of Applied Linguistics Cornelia Tschichold 0000-0001-8487-2209 1 Alex Boulton 2 Pascual Pérez-Paredes 3
title Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
spellingShingle Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
Cornelia Tschichold
title_short Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
title_full Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
title_fullStr Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
title_sort Interpreting the review process in applied linguistics research
author_id_str_mv 7ab58ba7c36c98911ed94a11fc7e5cb2
author_id_fullname_str_mv 7ab58ba7c36c98911ed94a11fc7e5cb2_***_Cornelia Tschichold
author Cornelia Tschichold
author2 Cornelia Tschichold
Alex Boulton
Pascual Pérez-Paredes
format Book chapter
container_title Developing Feedback Literacy for Academic Journal Peer Review
institution Swansea University
publisher Routledge
college_str College of Arts and Humanities
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id collegeofartsandhumanities
hierarchy_top_title College of Arts and Humanities
hierarchy_parent_id collegeofartsandhumanities
hierarchy_parent_title College of Arts and Humanities
department_str Department of Applied Linguistics{{{_:::_}}}College of Arts and Humanities{{{_:::_}}}Department of Applied Linguistics
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Peer review has been the subject of a number of academic publications, typically focusing on the reviewer’s perspective with the aim of promoting more helpful evaluations. By contrast, the present chapter takes an alternative view in defining the feedback literacy of authors who submit a manuscript to a journal. Basing the study on our involvement in a top-level journal in applied linguistics, we examine the submissions and the procedures, noting common problems along the way. We then draw on a 500,000-word corpus of reviews to select exemplars, adopting a case-study approach first of unsuccessful and then of successful submissions for more detailed examination. These exemplify both the cyclical process of reviewing and revising a manuscript and the conversations that take place between authors and reviewers. The aim of this chapter is twofold: to provide advice for all stages of the reviewing process and to contribute to the growing literature on feedback literacy by promoting reflective practices of those stakeholders involved in the process of submission and publication.
published_date 0001-01-01T12:31:02Z
_version_ 1776378196873183232
score 11.035349

Similar Items