No Cover Image

Journal article 446 views 47 downloads

The validity of unproctored online exams is undermined by cheating

Phil Newton Orcid Logo

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Volume: 120, Issue: 41

Swansea University Author: Phil Newton Orcid Logo

  • 64657.VOR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

    Download (118.17KB)

Abstract

I write regarding “Unproctored online exams provide meaningful assessment of student learning” by Chan and Ahn (1). I propose an alternative view—that unproctored online exams are not meaningful due to their inherent insecurity.

Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
ISSN: 0027-8424 1091-6490
Published: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2023
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa64657
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: I write regarding “Unproctored online exams provide meaningful assessment of student learning” by Chan and Ahn (1). I propose an alternative view—that unproctored online exams are not meaningful due to their inherent insecurity.
Keywords: Letter, online exams, cheating, person proctored exams, unproctored exams
College: Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
Issue: 41