Journal article 446 views 47 downloads
The validity of unproctored online exams is undermined by cheating
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Volume: 120, Issue: 41
Swansea University Author: Phil Newton
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Download (118.17KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1073/pnas.2312978120
Abstract
I write regarding “Unproctored online exams provide meaningful assessment of student learning” by Chan and Ahn (1). I propose an alternative view—that unproctored online exams are not meaningful due to their inherent insecurity.
Published in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
Published: |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2023
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa64657 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract: |
I write regarding “Unproctored online exams provide meaningful assessment of student learning” by Chan and Ahn (1). I propose an alternative view—that unproctored online exams are not meaningful due to their inherent insecurity. |
---|---|
Keywords: |
Letter, online exams, cheating, person proctored exams, unproctored exams |
College: |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
Issue: |
41 |