Journal article 413 views 35 downloads
Individual participant data from digital sources informed and improved precision in the evaluation of predictive biomarkers in Bayesian network meta-analysis
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Volume: 164, Pages: 96 - 103
Swansea University Author: Rhiannon Owen
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Download (925.61KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.018
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to develop a network meta-analytic model for the evaluation of treatment effectiveness within predictive biomarker subgroups, by combining evidence from individual participant data (IPD) from digital sources (in the absence of randomized controlled trials) and aggregate data (AD...
Published in: | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0895-4356 |
Published: |
Elsevier BV
2023
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa65015 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2023-12-13T12:11:46Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2023-12-13T12:11:46Z |
id |
cronfa65015 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>65015</id><entry>2023-11-20</entry><title>Individual participant data from digital sources informed and improved precision in the evaluation of predictive biomarkers in Bayesian network meta-analysis</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>0d30aa00eef6528f763a1e1589f703ec</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-5977-376X</ORCID><firstname>Rhiannon</firstname><surname>Owen</surname><name>Rhiannon Owen</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2023-11-20</date><deptcode>HDAT</deptcode><abstract>Objectives: We aimed to develop a network meta-analytic model for the evaluation of treatment effectiveness within predictive biomarker subgroups, by combining evidence from individual participant data (IPD) from digital sources (in the absence of randomized controlled trials) and aggregate data (AD). Study Design and Setting: A Bayesian framework was developed for modeling time-to-event data to evaluate predictive biomarkers. IPD were sourced from electronic health records, using a target trial emulation approach, or digitized Kaplan-Meier curves. The model is illustrated using two examples: breast cancer with a hormone receptor biomarker, and metastatic colorectal cancer with the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) biomarker. Results: The model allowed for the estimation of treatment effects in two subgroups of patients defined by their biomarker status. Effectiveness of taxanes did not differ in hormone receptor positive and negative breast cancer patients. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors were more effective than chemotherapy in KRAS wild type colorectal cancer patients but not in patients with KRAS mutant status. Use of IPD reduced uncertainty of the subgroup-specific treatment effect estimates by up to 49%. Conclusion: Utilization of IPD allowed for more detailed evaluation of predictive biomarkers and cancer therapies and improved precision of the estimates compared to use of AD alone.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology</journal><volume>164</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>96</paginationStart><paginationEnd>103</paginationEnd><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0895-4356</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>IPD network meta-analysis, Network meta-regression, Predictive biomarker, Colorectal cancer, Breast cancer, One-stage Bayesian hierarchical model</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.018</doi><url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.018</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Health Data Science</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HDAT</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>This research was funded by the Medical Research Council, Methodology Research Panel (grant no. MR/T025166/1) and partly supported by Health Data Research UK, an initiative funded by UK Research and Innovation, Department of Health, and Social Care (England) and the devolved administrations, and leading medical research charities.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-12-13T12:14:05.4196317</lastEdited><Created>2023-11-20T10:57:52.0455303</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">Swansea University Medical School - Health Data Science</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Chinyereugo M.</firstname><surname>Umemneku-Chikere</surname><orcid>0000-0003-4114-2227</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Lorna</firstname><surname>Wheaton</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2318-7109</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Heather</firstname><surname>Poad</surname><orcid>0000-0001-5058-4292</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Devleena</firstname><surname>Ray</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Ilse Cuevas</firstname><surname>Andrade</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Sam</firstname><surname>Khan</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Paul</firstname><surname>Tappenden</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Keith R.</firstname><surname>Abrams</surname><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Rhiannon</firstname><surname>Owen</surname><orcid>0000-0001-5977-376X</orcid><order>9</order></author><author><firstname>Sylwia</firstname><surname>Bujkiewicz</surname><orcid>0000-0002-3003-9403</orcid><order>10</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>65015__29256__741965ba42164c708d8b6aec9d11c7d8.pdf</filename><originalFilename>65015.VOR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2023-12-13T12:12:12.0252999</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>947822</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
v2 65015 2023-11-20 Individual participant data from digital sources informed and improved precision in the evaluation of predictive biomarkers in Bayesian network meta-analysis 0d30aa00eef6528f763a1e1589f703ec 0000-0001-5977-376X Rhiannon Owen Rhiannon Owen true false 2023-11-20 HDAT Objectives: We aimed to develop a network meta-analytic model for the evaluation of treatment effectiveness within predictive biomarker subgroups, by combining evidence from individual participant data (IPD) from digital sources (in the absence of randomized controlled trials) and aggregate data (AD). Study Design and Setting: A Bayesian framework was developed for modeling time-to-event data to evaluate predictive biomarkers. IPD were sourced from electronic health records, using a target trial emulation approach, or digitized Kaplan-Meier curves. The model is illustrated using two examples: breast cancer with a hormone receptor biomarker, and metastatic colorectal cancer with the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) biomarker. Results: The model allowed for the estimation of treatment effects in two subgroups of patients defined by their biomarker status. Effectiveness of taxanes did not differ in hormone receptor positive and negative breast cancer patients. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors were more effective than chemotherapy in KRAS wild type colorectal cancer patients but not in patients with KRAS mutant status. Use of IPD reduced uncertainty of the subgroup-specific treatment effect estimates by up to 49%. Conclusion: Utilization of IPD allowed for more detailed evaluation of predictive biomarkers and cancer therapies and improved precision of the estimates compared to use of AD alone. Journal Article Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 164 96 103 Elsevier BV 0895-4356 IPD network meta-analysis, Network meta-regression, Predictive biomarker, Colorectal cancer, Breast cancer, One-stage Bayesian hierarchical model 31 12 2023 2023-12-31 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.018 COLLEGE NANME Health Data Science COLLEGE CODE HDAT Swansea University This research was funded by the Medical Research Council, Methodology Research Panel (grant no. MR/T025166/1) and partly supported by Health Data Research UK, an initiative funded by UK Research and Innovation, Department of Health, and Social Care (England) and the devolved administrations, and leading medical research charities. 2023-12-13T12:14:05.4196317 2023-11-20T10:57:52.0455303 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Swansea University Medical School - Health Data Science Chinyereugo M. Umemneku-Chikere 0000-0003-4114-2227 1 Lorna Wheaton 0000-0002-2318-7109 2 Heather Poad 0000-0001-5058-4292 3 Devleena Ray 4 Ilse Cuevas Andrade 5 Sam Khan 6 Paul Tappenden 7 Keith R. Abrams 8 Rhiannon Owen 0000-0001-5977-376X 9 Sylwia Bujkiewicz 0000-0002-3003-9403 10 65015__29256__741965ba42164c708d8b6aec9d11c7d8.pdf 65015.VOR.pdf 2023-12-13T12:12:12.0252999 Output 947822 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
Individual participant data from digital sources informed and improved precision in the evaluation of predictive biomarkers in Bayesian network meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Individual participant data from digital sources informed and improved precision in the evaluation of predictive biomarkers in Bayesian network meta-analysis Rhiannon Owen |
title_short |
Individual participant data from digital sources informed and improved precision in the evaluation of predictive biomarkers in Bayesian network meta-analysis |
title_full |
Individual participant data from digital sources informed and improved precision in the evaluation of predictive biomarkers in Bayesian network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Individual participant data from digital sources informed and improved precision in the evaluation of predictive biomarkers in Bayesian network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Individual participant data from digital sources informed and improved precision in the evaluation of predictive biomarkers in Bayesian network meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Individual participant data from digital sources informed and improved precision in the evaluation of predictive biomarkers in Bayesian network meta-analysis |
author_id_str_mv |
0d30aa00eef6528f763a1e1589f703ec |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
0d30aa00eef6528f763a1e1589f703ec_***_Rhiannon Owen |
author |
Rhiannon Owen |
author2 |
Chinyereugo M. Umemneku-Chikere Lorna Wheaton Heather Poad Devleena Ray Ilse Cuevas Andrade Sam Khan Paul Tappenden Keith R. Abrams Rhiannon Owen Sylwia Bujkiewicz |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
container_volume |
164 |
container_start_page |
96 |
publishDate |
2023 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0895-4356 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.018 |
publisher |
Elsevier BV |
college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
department_str |
Swansea University Medical School - Health Data Science{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Swansea University Medical School - Health Data Science |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.018 |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Objectives: We aimed to develop a network meta-analytic model for the evaluation of treatment effectiveness within predictive biomarker subgroups, by combining evidence from individual participant data (IPD) from digital sources (in the absence of randomized controlled trials) and aggregate data (AD). Study Design and Setting: A Bayesian framework was developed for modeling time-to-event data to evaluate predictive biomarkers. IPD were sourced from electronic health records, using a target trial emulation approach, or digitized Kaplan-Meier curves. The model is illustrated using two examples: breast cancer with a hormone receptor biomarker, and metastatic colorectal cancer with the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) biomarker. Results: The model allowed for the estimation of treatment effects in two subgroups of patients defined by their biomarker status. Effectiveness of taxanes did not differ in hormone receptor positive and negative breast cancer patients. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors were more effective than chemotherapy in KRAS wild type colorectal cancer patients but not in patients with KRAS mutant status. Use of IPD reduced uncertainty of the subgroup-specific treatment effect estimates by up to 49%. Conclusion: Utilization of IPD allowed for more detailed evaluation of predictive biomarkers and cancer therapies and improved precision of the estimates compared to use of AD alone. |
published_date |
2023-12-31T12:14:06Z |
_version_ |
1785168811789385728 |
score |
11.03559 |