No Cover Image

Journal article 165 views 21 downloads

Physiological and perceptual responses to sprint interval exercise using arm versus leg cycling ergometry

Todd A. Astorino Orcid Logo, Shealin Pierce, Madisen B. Piva, Richard Metcalfe Orcid Logo, Niels B.J. Vollaard Orcid Logo

Sports Medicine and Health Science

Swansea University Author: Richard Metcalfe Orcid Logo

  • 65546.pdf

    PDF | Proof

    © 2024 Chengdu Sport University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

    Download (597.08KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.smhs.2024.01.007

Abstract

Increases in power output and maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) occur in response to sprint interval exercise (SIE), but common use of “all-out” intensities presents a barrier for many adults. Furthermore, lower-body SIE is not feasible for all adults. We compared physiological and perceptual res...

Full description

Published in: Sports Medicine and Health Science
ISSN: 2666-3376
Published: Elsevier BV 2024
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa65546
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2024-01-31T09:47:03Z
last_indexed 2024-01-31T09:47:03Z
id cronfa65546
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>65546</id><entry>2024-01-31</entry><title>Physiological and perceptual responses to sprint interval exercise using arm versus leg cycling ergometry</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>9bb783273dd9d54a2f3f66f75c43abdf</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-0980-2977</ORCID><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Metcalfe</surname><name>Richard Metcalfe</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-01-31</date><deptcode>STSC</deptcode><abstract>Increases in power output and maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) occur in response to sprint interval exercise (SIE), but common use of “all-out” intensities presents a barrier for many adults. Furthermore, lower-body SIE is not feasible for all adults. We compared physiological and perceptual responses to supramaximal, but “non-all-out” SIE between leg and arm cycling exercise. Twenty-four active adults (mean ± SD age: [25 ± 7] y; cycling V̇O2max: [39 ± 7] mL·kg−1·min−1) performed incremental exercise using leg (LCE) and arm cycle ergometry (ACE) to determine V̇O2max and maximal work capacity (Wmax). Subsequently, they performed four 20 s (s) bouts of SIE at 130 % Wmax on the LCE or ACE at cadence = 120–130 rev/min, with 2 min (min) recovery between intervals. Gas exchange data, heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration (BLa), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and affective valence were acquired. Data showed significantly lower (p &lt; 0.001) absolute mean ([1.24 ± 0.31] L·min−1 vs. [1.59 ± 0.34] L·min−1; d = 1.08) and peak V̇O2 ([1.79 ± 0.48] L·min−1 vs. [2.10 ± 0.44] L·min−1; d = 0.70) with ACE versus LCE. However, ACE elicited significantly higher (p &lt; 0.001) relative mean ([62 % ± 9 %] V̇O2max vs. [57 % ± 7 %] V̇O2max, d = 0.63) and peak V̇O2 ([88 % ± 10 %] V̇O2max vs. [75 % ± 10 %] V̇O2max, d = 1.33). Post-exercise BLa was significantly higher ([7.0 ± 1.7] mM vs. [5.7 ± 1.5] mM, p = 0.024, d = 0.83) for LCE versus ACE. There was no significant effect of modality on RPE or affective valence (p &gt; 0.42), and lowest affective valence recorded (2.0 ± 1.8) was considered “good to fairly good”. Data show that non “all-out” ACE elicits lower absolute but higher relative HR and V̇O2 compared to LCE. Less aversive perceptual responses could make this non-all-out modality feasible for inactive adults.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Sports Medicine and Health Science</journal><volume>0</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>2666-3376</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>High intensity interval training, Upper body exercise, Peak power output, Oxygen uptake, Blood lactate concentration</keywords><publishedDay>6</publishedDay><publishedMonth>2</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-02-06</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.smhs.2024.01.007</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Sport and Exercise Sciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>STSC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Not Required</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-03-14T15:02:30.0596023</lastEdited><Created>2024-01-31T09:44:10.5506684</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Todd A.</firstname><surname>Astorino</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0492-0173</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Shealin</firstname><surname>Pierce</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Madisen B.</firstname><surname>Piva</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Metcalfe</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0980-2977</orcid><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Niels B.J.</firstname><surname>Vollaard</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4576-8879</orcid><order>5</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>65546__29715__f356ea35bd99412fb4df805b197020b8.pdf</filename><originalFilename>65546.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2024-03-14T14:55:13.1163715</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>611406</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Proof</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2024 Chengdu Sport University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling v2 65546 2024-01-31 Physiological and perceptual responses to sprint interval exercise using arm versus leg cycling ergometry 9bb783273dd9d54a2f3f66f75c43abdf 0000-0003-0980-2977 Richard Metcalfe Richard Metcalfe true false 2024-01-31 STSC Increases in power output and maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) occur in response to sprint interval exercise (SIE), but common use of “all-out” intensities presents a barrier for many adults. Furthermore, lower-body SIE is not feasible for all adults. We compared physiological and perceptual responses to supramaximal, but “non-all-out” SIE between leg and arm cycling exercise. Twenty-four active adults (mean ± SD age: [25 ± 7] y; cycling V̇O2max: [39 ± 7] mL·kg−1·min−1) performed incremental exercise using leg (LCE) and arm cycle ergometry (ACE) to determine V̇O2max and maximal work capacity (Wmax). Subsequently, they performed four 20 s (s) bouts of SIE at 130 % Wmax on the LCE or ACE at cadence = 120–130 rev/min, with 2 min (min) recovery between intervals. Gas exchange data, heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration (BLa), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and affective valence were acquired. Data showed significantly lower (p < 0.001) absolute mean ([1.24 ± 0.31] L·min−1 vs. [1.59 ± 0.34] L·min−1; d = 1.08) and peak V̇O2 ([1.79 ± 0.48] L·min−1 vs. [2.10 ± 0.44] L·min−1; d = 0.70) with ACE versus LCE. However, ACE elicited significantly higher (p < 0.001) relative mean ([62 % ± 9 %] V̇O2max vs. [57 % ± 7 %] V̇O2max, d = 0.63) and peak V̇O2 ([88 % ± 10 %] V̇O2max vs. [75 % ± 10 %] V̇O2max, d = 1.33). Post-exercise BLa was significantly higher ([7.0 ± 1.7] mM vs. [5.7 ± 1.5] mM, p = 0.024, d = 0.83) for LCE versus ACE. There was no significant effect of modality on RPE or affective valence (p > 0.42), and lowest affective valence recorded (2.0 ± 1.8) was considered “good to fairly good”. Data show that non “all-out” ACE elicits lower absolute but higher relative HR and V̇O2 compared to LCE. Less aversive perceptual responses could make this non-all-out modality feasible for inactive adults. Journal Article Sports Medicine and Health Science 0 Elsevier BV 2666-3376 High intensity interval training, Upper body exercise, Peak power output, Oxygen uptake, Blood lactate concentration 6 2 2024 2024-02-06 10.1016/j.smhs.2024.01.007 COLLEGE NANME Sport and Exercise Sciences COLLEGE CODE STSC Swansea University Not Required 2024-03-14T15:02:30.0596023 2024-01-31T09:44:10.5506684 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences Todd A. Astorino 0000-0003-0492-0173 1 Shealin Pierce 2 Madisen B. Piva 3 Richard Metcalfe 0000-0003-0980-2977 4 Niels B.J. Vollaard 0000-0002-4576-8879 5 65546__29715__f356ea35bd99412fb4df805b197020b8.pdf 65546.pdf 2024-03-14T14:55:13.1163715 Output 611406 application/pdf Proof true © 2024 Chengdu Sport University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
title Physiological and perceptual responses to sprint interval exercise using arm versus leg cycling ergometry
spellingShingle Physiological and perceptual responses to sprint interval exercise using arm versus leg cycling ergometry
Richard Metcalfe
title_short Physiological and perceptual responses to sprint interval exercise using arm versus leg cycling ergometry
title_full Physiological and perceptual responses to sprint interval exercise using arm versus leg cycling ergometry
title_fullStr Physiological and perceptual responses to sprint interval exercise using arm versus leg cycling ergometry
title_full_unstemmed Physiological and perceptual responses to sprint interval exercise using arm versus leg cycling ergometry
title_sort Physiological and perceptual responses to sprint interval exercise using arm versus leg cycling ergometry
author_id_str_mv 9bb783273dd9d54a2f3f66f75c43abdf
author_id_fullname_str_mv 9bb783273dd9d54a2f3f66f75c43abdf_***_Richard Metcalfe
author Richard Metcalfe
author2 Todd A. Astorino
Shealin Pierce
Madisen B. Piva
Richard Metcalfe
Niels B.J. Vollaard
format Journal article
container_title Sports Medicine and Health Science
container_volume 0
publishDate 2024
institution Swansea University
issn 2666-3376
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.smhs.2024.01.007
publisher Elsevier BV
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Increases in power output and maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) occur in response to sprint interval exercise (SIE), but common use of “all-out” intensities presents a barrier for many adults. Furthermore, lower-body SIE is not feasible for all adults. We compared physiological and perceptual responses to supramaximal, but “non-all-out” SIE between leg and arm cycling exercise. Twenty-four active adults (mean ± SD age: [25 ± 7] y; cycling V̇O2max: [39 ± 7] mL·kg−1·min−1) performed incremental exercise using leg (LCE) and arm cycle ergometry (ACE) to determine V̇O2max and maximal work capacity (Wmax). Subsequently, they performed four 20 s (s) bouts of SIE at 130 % Wmax on the LCE or ACE at cadence = 120–130 rev/min, with 2 min (min) recovery between intervals. Gas exchange data, heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration (BLa), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and affective valence were acquired. Data showed significantly lower (p < 0.001) absolute mean ([1.24 ± 0.31] L·min−1 vs. [1.59 ± 0.34] L·min−1; d = 1.08) and peak V̇O2 ([1.79 ± 0.48] L·min−1 vs. [2.10 ± 0.44] L·min−1; d = 0.70) with ACE versus LCE. However, ACE elicited significantly higher (p < 0.001) relative mean ([62 % ± 9 %] V̇O2max vs. [57 % ± 7 %] V̇O2max, d = 0.63) and peak V̇O2 ([88 % ± 10 %] V̇O2max vs. [75 % ± 10 %] V̇O2max, d = 1.33). Post-exercise BLa was significantly higher ([7.0 ± 1.7] mM vs. [5.7 ± 1.5] mM, p = 0.024, d = 0.83) for LCE versus ACE. There was no significant effect of modality on RPE or affective valence (p > 0.42), and lowest affective valence recorded (2.0 ± 1.8) was considered “good to fairly good”. Data show that non “all-out” ACE elicits lower absolute but higher relative HR and V̇O2 compared to LCE. Less aversive perceptual responses could make this non-all-out modality feasible for inactive adults.
published_date 2024-02-06T15:02:26Z
_version_ 1793514323645038592
score 11.017797

Similar Items