Journal article 374 views 55 downloads
Between loss and restoration: The role of liminality in advancing theories of grief and bereavement
Katherine Bristowe ,
Liadh Timmins ,
Alexandra Pitman ,
Debbie Braybrook ,
Steve Marshall,
Katherine Johnson ,
Michael King,
Anna Roach,
Deokhee Yi ,
Kathryn Almack,
Elizabeth Day,
Paul Clift,
Ruth Rose,
Richard Harding
Social Science and Medicine, Volume: 344
Swansea University Author: Liadh Timmins
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Download (3.83MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116616
Abstract
A recent national survey of bereaved partners found high levels of complicated grief and psychological distress, with evidence that loneliness and isolation may contribute to these outcomes. However, the mechanisms of action for this have not been explored. To advance grief theory this paper reports...
Published in: | Social Science and Medicine |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0277-9536 |
Published: |
Elsevier BV
2024
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa65704 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2024-02-26T19:28:15Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2024-02-26T19:28:15Z |
id |
cronfa65704 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>65704</id><entry>2024-02-26</entry><title>Between loss and restoration: The role of liminality in advancing theories of grief and bereavement</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7f227f6f0fc0400bae2893d252d2f5ec</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-7984-4748</ORCID><firstname>Liadh</firstname><surname>Timmins</surname><name>Liadh Timmins</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-02-26</date><deptcode>HPS</deptcode><abstract>A recent national survey of bereaved partners found high levels of complicated grief and psychological distress, with evidence that loneliness and isolation may contribute to these outcomes. However, the mechanisms of action for this have not been explored. To advance grief theory this paper reports analysis of the survey free-text data to examine the relationship between social support and emotional responses to bereavement. Individuals bereaved of a civil partner or spouse 6–10 months previously were identified through death registration data. 569/1945 (29 %) completed surveys were received. Of those, 311 participants (55 %) provided responses to two free-text questions which asked about their ‘feelings since the death of their partner or spouse’, and ‘about the support around’ them. Data were analysed using corpus-assisted discourse analysis and the discourse dynamics approach for figurative language. Participants described diverse emotional responses to the bereavement (e.g. sadness, anger, denial, acceptance), and the value of formal and informal bereavement support. Although many of the experiences described are accounted for in existing grief theory, some participants described a liminal experience not recognised within these theories. They felt trapped, unable to engage with loss or restoration, and unable to move forward as their planned future no longer existed. They sought out ‘communitas’ (solidarity in experiences), but often found support from their social networks had diminished. Metaphors were used to describe this liminality, with partner grief expressed as a dark agentic force, a monster, an abyss, and as water. The findings of this study offer original insights into experiences and trajectories of bereavement, and our understandings of prolonged or complicated grief. A novel model ‘Between Loss and Restoration’ is presented to include these experiences. Recognition of the place for liminality within the spectrum of grief experiences could enhance grief literacy and improve formal and informal bereavement support provision.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Social Science and Medicine</journal><volume>344</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0277-9536</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Bereavement; Qualitative; Partner; Emotions; Grief; Social support; Theory</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-03-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116616</doi><url/><notes>Data:It is not possible for the data from this study to be made available given the terms of our ethical approval due to the risk of deidentifying individuals.</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>This work was supported by the Marie Curie Research Grants Scheme: grant reference - MCRGS–07–16–45.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-03-25T13:48:24.2658550</lastEdited><Created>2024-02-26T19:25:19.4035215</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Katherine</firstname><surname>Bristowe</surname><orcid>0000-0003-1809-217x</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Liadh</firstname><surname>Timmins</surname><orcid>0000-0001-7984-4748</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Alexandra</firstname><surname>Pitman</surname><orcid>0000-0002-9742-1359</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Debbie</firstname><surname>Braybrook</surname><orcid>0000-0001-9253-4955</orcid><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Steve</firstname><surname>Marshall</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Katherine</firstname><surname>Johnson</surname><orcid>0000-0001-7092-4426</orcid><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Michael</firstname><surname>King</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Anna</firstname><surname>Roach</surname><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Deokhee</firstname><surname>Yi</surname><orcid>0000-0003-4894-1689</orcid><order>9</order></author><author><firstname>Kathryn</firstname><surname>Almack</surname><order>10</order></author><author><firstname>Elizabeth</firstname><surname>Day</surname><order>11</order></author><author><firstname>Paul</firstname><surname>Clift</surname><order>12</order></author><author><firstname>Ruth</firstname><surname>Rose</surname><order>13</order></author><author><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Harding</surname><order>14</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>65704__29640__bf9f899bd41f419294e049ef8b9e2387.pdf</filename><originalFilename>65704.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2024-03-05T12:04:28.5073520</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>4014712</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
v2 65704 2024-02-26 Between loss and restoration: The role of liminality in advancing theories of grief and bereavement 7f227f6f0fc0400bae2893d252d2f5ec 0000-0001-7984-4748 Liadh Timmins Liadh Timmins true false 2024-02-26 HPS A recent national survey of bereaved partners found high levels of complicated grief and psychological distress, with evidence that loneliness and isolation may contribute to these outcomes. However, the mechanisms of action for this have not been explored. To advance grief theory this paper reports analysis of the survey free-text data to examine the relationship between social support and emotional responses to bereavement. Individuals bereaved of a civil partner or spouse 6–10 months previously were identified through death registration data. 569/1945 (29 %) completed surveys were received. Of those, 311 participants (55 %) provided responses to two free-text questions which asked about their ‘feelings since the death of their partner or spouse’, and ‘about the support around’ them. Data were analysed using corpus-assisted discourse analysis and the discourse dynamics approach for figurative language. Participants described diverse emotional responses to the bereavement (e.g. sadness, anger, denial, acceptance), and the value of formal and informal bereavement support. Although many of the experiences described are accounted for in existing grief theory, some participants described a liminal experience not recognised within these theories. They felt trapped, unable to engage with loss or restoration, and unable to move forward as their planned future no longer existed. They sought out ‘communitas’ (solidarity in experiences), but often found support from their social networks had diminished. Metaphors were used to describe this liminality, with partner grief expressed as a dark agentic force, a monster, an abyss, and as water. The findings of this study offer original insights into experiences and trajectories of bereavement, and our understandings of prolonged or complicated grief. A novel model ‘Between Loss and Restoration’ is presented to include these experiences. Recognition of the place for liminality within the spectrum of grief experiences could enhance grief literacy and improve formal and informal bereavement support provision. Journal Article Social Science and Medicine 344 Elsevier BV 0277-9536 Bereavement; Qualitative; Partner; Emotions; Grief; Social support; Theory 1 3 2024 2024-03-01 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116616 Data:It is not possible for the data from this study to be made available given the terms of our ethical approval due to the risk of deidentifying individuals. COLLEGE NANME Psychology COLLEGE CODE HPS Swansea University This work was supported by the Marie Curie Research Grants Scheme: grant reference - MCRGS–07–16–45. 2024-03-25T13:48:24.2658550 2024-02-26T19:25:19.4035215 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Katherine Bristowe 0000-0003-1809-217x 1 Liadh Timmins 0000-0001-7984-4748 2 Alexandra Pitman 0000-0002-9742-1359 3 Debbie Braybrook 0000-0001-9253-4955 4 Steve Marshall 5 Katherine Johnson 0000-0001-7092-4426 6 Michael King 7 Anna Roach 8 Deokhee Yi 0000-0003-4894-1689 9 Kathryn Almack 10 Elizabeth Day 11 Paul Clift 12 Ruth Rose 13 Richard Harding 14 65704__29640__bf9f899bd41f419294e049ef8b9e2387.pdf 65704.pdf 2024-03-05T12:04:28.5073520 Output 4014712 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
Between loss and restoration: The role of liminality in advancing theories of grief and bereavement |
spellingShingle |
Between loss and restoration: The role of liminality in advancing theories of grief and bereavement Liadh Timmins |
title_short |
Between loss and restoration: The role of liminality in advancing theories of grief and bereavement |
title_full |
Between loss and restoration: The role of liminality in advancing theories of grief and bereavement |
title_fullStr |
Between loss and restoration: The role of liminality in advancing theories of grief and bereavement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Between loss and restoration: The role of liminality in advancing theories of grief and bereavement |
title_sort |
Between loss and restoration: The role of liminality in advancing theories of grief and bereavement |
author_id_str_mv |
7f227f6f0fc0400bae2893d252d2f5ec |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
7f227f6f0fc0400bae2893d252d2f5ec_***_Liadh Timmins |
author |
Liadh Timmins |
author2 |
Katherine Bristowe Liadh Timmins Alexandra Pitman Debbie Braybrook Steve Marshall Katherine Johnson Michael King Anna Roach Deokhee Yi Kathryn Almack Elizabeth Day Paul Clift Ruth Rose Richard Harding |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Social Science and Medicine |
container_volume |
344 |
publishDate |
2024 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0277-9536 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116616 |
publisher |
Elsevier BV |
college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
department_str |
School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
A recent national survey of bereaved partners found high levels of complicated grief and psychological distress, with evidence that loneliness and isolation may contribute to these outcomes. However, the mechanisms of action for this have not been explored. To advance grief theory this paper reports analysis of the survey free-text data to examine the relationship between social support and emotional responses to bereavement. Individuals bereaved of a civil partner or spouse 6–10 months previously were identified through death registration data. 569/1945 (29 %) completed surveys were received. Of those, 311 participants (55 %) provided responses to two free-text questions which asked about their ‘feelings since the death of their partner or spouse’, and ‘about the support around’ them. Data were analysed using corpus-assisted discourse analysis and the discourse dynamics approach for figurative language. Participants described diverse emotional responses to the bereavement (e.g. sadness, anger, denial, acceptance), and the value of formal and informal bereavement support. Although many of the experiences described are accounted for in existing grief theory, some participants described a liminal experience not recognised within these theories. They felt trapped, unable to engage with loss or restoration, and unable to move forward as their planned future no longer existed. They sought out ‘communitas’ (solidarity in experiences), but often found support from their social networks had diminished. Metaphors were used to describe this liminality, with partner grief expressed as a dark agentic force, a monster, an abyss, and as water. The findings of this study offer original insights into experiences and trajectories of bereavement, and our understandings of prolonged or complicated grief. A novel model ‘Between Loss and Restoration’ is presented to include these experiences. Recognition of the place for liminality within the spectrum of grief experiences could enhance grief literacy and improve formal and informal bereavement support provision. |
published_date |
2024-03-01T13:48:20Z |
_version_ |
1794506228662009856 |
score |
11.036706 |