No Cover Image

Journal article 31 views

Cash Cows and Dogs with Dentures: Prostheses for Animals in Nineteenth-Century British Culture

Ryan Sweet Orcid Logo

Journal of Victorian Culture

Swansea University Author: Ryan Sweet Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

DOI (Published version): 10.1093/jvcult/vcae013

Abstract

This article shows how the history of prostheticised animals is much deeper and richer than one might think. Investigating the interest in fitting animals with prostheses throughout the nineteenth century in Britain, this article explores the emergence of animal prostheses in bovine agriculture thro...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Victorian Culture
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa66735
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2024-06-14T14:59:18Z
last_indexed 2024-06-14T14:59:18Z
id cronfa66735
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>66735</id><entry>2024-06-14</entry><title>Cash Cows and Dogs with Dentures: Prostheses for Animals in Nineteenth-Century British Culture</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>6c7e97eb11090ab27457aee892340748</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-1337-5699</ORCID><firstname>Ryan</firstname><surname>Sweet</surname><name>Ryan Sweet</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-06-14</date><deptcode>CACS</deptcode><abstract>This article shows how the history of prostheticised animals is much deeper and richer than one might think. Investigating the interest in fitting animals with prostheses throughout the nineteenth century in Britain, this article explores the emergence of animal prostheses in bovine agriculture through to their use in late Victorian pet keeping. The key concern of this is piece is the varied responses to prostheticised animals in print culture. As this article shows through an analysis of magazine and newspaper contributions, reactions to animal prostheses varied from admiration and amazement to annoyance and disgust. By analysing this coverage, the article reveals how representations of animal prostheses brought into collision a surprising variety of important social discourses, including those related to economic productivity, prosthesis access, food adulteration, professional recognition, social norms, class hierarchies, and gender relations. Animal prostheses proved a novel yet apt image that distilled a wide variety of societal concerns. Redirecting the critical momentum established by recent scholarship that unites disability studies and critical animal studies, this article uses nineteenth-century animal prostheses as a case study to demonstrate how the concepts of disability, ableism, classism, and misogyny have been extended by humans across species boundaries and how our approaches to nonhuman care are impacted by them. It therefore establishes a new field of inquiry within Victorian studies for scholarship on the interface between discourses of disability and nonhuman animals.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Victorian Culture</journal><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><placeOfPublication>Oxford</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>Animals, prostheses, cattle, agriculture, pets, veterinary practice, gender, class, disability, disability studies, critical animal studies, posthumanism</keywords><publishedDay>0</publishedDay><publishedMonth>0</publishedMonth><publishedYear>0</publishedYear><publishedDate>0001-01-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1093/jvcult/vcae013</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Culture and Communications School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CACS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal)</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-06-27T16:41:00.7765624</lastEdited><Created>2024-06-14T15:52:23.6852364</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Ryan</firstname><surname>Sweet</surname><orcid>0000-0003-1337-5699</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling v2 66735 2024-06-14 Cash Cows and Dogs with Dentures: Prostheses for Animals in Nineteenth-Century British Culture 6c7e97eb11090ab27457aee892340748 0000-0003-1337-5699 Ryan Sweet Ryan Sweet true false 2024-06-14 CACS This article shows how the history of prostheticised animals is much deeper and richer than one might think. Investigating the interest in fitting animals with prostheses throughout the nineteenth century in Britain, this article explores the emergence of animal prostheses in bovine agriculture through to their use in late Victorian pet keeping. The key concern of this is piece is the varied responses to prostheticised animals in print culture. As this article shows through an analysis of magazine and newspaper contributions, reactions to animal prostheses varied from admiration and amazement to annoyance and disgust. By analysing this coverage, the article reveals how representations of animal prostheses brought into collision a surprising variety of important social discourses, including those related to economic productivity, prosthesis access, food adulteration, professional recognition, social norms, class hierarchies, and gender relations. Animal prostheses proved a novel yet apt image that distilled a wide variety of societal concerns. Redirecting the critical momentum established by recent scholarship that unites disability studies and critical animal studies, this article uses nineteenth-century animal prostheses as a case study to demonstrate how the concepts of disability, ableism, classism, and misogyny have been extended by humans across species boundaries and how our approaches to nonhuman care are impacted by them. It therefore establishes a new field of inquiry within Victorian studies for scholarship on the interface between discourses of disability and nonhuman animals. Journal Article Journal of Victorian Culture Oxford University Press Oxford Animals, prostheses, cattle, agriculture, pets, veterinary practice, gender, class, disability, disability studies, critical animal studies, posthumanism 0 0 0 0001-01-01 10.1093/jvcult/vcae013 COLLEGE NANME Culture and Communications School COLLEGE CODE CACS Swansea University SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal) 2024-06-27T16:41:00.7765624 2024-06-14T15:52:23.6852364 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing Ryan Sweet 0000-0003-1337-5699 1
title Cash Cows and Dogs with Dentures: Prostheses for Animals in Nineteenth-Century British Culture
spellingShingle Cash Cows and Dogs with Dentures: Prostheses for Animals in Nineteenth-Century British Culture
Ryan Sweet
title_short Cash Cows and Dogs with Dentures: Prostheses for Animals in Nineteenth-Century British Culture
title_full Cash Cows and Dogs with Dentures: Prostheses for Animals in Nineteenth-Century British Culture
title_fullStr Cash Cows and Dogs with Dentures: Prostheses for Animals in Nineteenth-Century British Culture
title_full_unstemmed Cash Cows and Dogs with Dentures: Prostheses for Animals in Nineteenth-Century British Culture
title_sort Cash Cows and Dogs with Dentures: Prostheses for Animals in Nineteenth-Century British Culture
author_id_str_mv 6c7e97eb11090ab27457aee892340748
author_id_fullname_str_mv 6c7e97eb11090ab27457aee892340748_***_Ryan Sweet
author Ryan Sweet
author2 Ryan Sweet
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Victorian Culture
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jvcult/vcae013
publisher Oxford University Press
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - English Literature, Creative Writing
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description This article shows how the history of prostheticised animals is much deeper and richer than one might think. Investigating the interest in fitting animals with prostheses throughout the nineteenth century in Britain, this article explores the emergence of animal prostheses in bovine agriculture through to their use in late Victorian pet keeping. The key concern of this is piece is the varied responses to prostheticised animals in print culture. As this article shows through an analysis of magazine and newspaper contributions, reactions to animal prostheses varied from admiration and amazement to annoyance and disgust. By analysing this coverage, the article reveals how representations of animal prostheses brought into collision a surprising variety of important social discourses, including those related to economic productivity, prosthesis access, food adulteration, professional recognition, social norms, class hierarchies, and gender relations. Animal prostheses proved a novel yet apt image that distilled a wide variety of societal concerns. Redirecting the critical momentum established by recent scholarship that unites disability studies and critical animal studies, this article uses nineteenth-century animal prostheses as a case study to demonstrate how the concepts of disability, ableism, classism, and misogyny have been extended by humans across species boundaries and how our approaches to nonhuman care are impacted by them. It therefore establishes a new field of inquiry within Victorian studies for scholarship on the interface between discourses of disability and nonhuman animals.
published_date 0001-01-01T16:41:00Z
_version_ 1803029431453745152
score 11.012678

Similar Items