Journal article 7 views 4 downloads
Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production
Yuanting Qiao
,
Weishan Liu,
Ruonan Guo,
Shuzhuang Sun,
Shuming Zhang,
Josh J. Bailey,
Mengxiang Fang,
Chunfei Wu
Fuel, Volume: 332, Start page: 125972
Swansea University Author:
Yuanting Qiao
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2022 The Authors.This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Download (2MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125972
Abstract
Currently, excessive CO2 emissions have become a global challenge due to their influence on the climate. According to the Paris Agreement, global warming should be limited to 1.5 °C by 2100. Carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) are attractive as they can both reduce CO2 content and utilise CO2 as a...
Published in: | Fuel |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-2361 |
Published: |
Elsevier BV
2023
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa67096 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2024-08-30T12:19:34Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2024-08-30T12:19:34Z |
id |
cronfa67096 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>67096</id><entry>2024-07-15</entry><title>Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>ceae57100ecb7c4b2883e29079a8985d</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-7741-9278</ORCID><firstname>Yuanting</firstname><surname>Qiao</surname><name>Yuanting Qiao</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-07-15</date><deptcode>EAAS</deptcode><abstract>Currently, excessive CO2 emissions have become a global challenge due to their influence on the climate. According to the Paris Agreement, global warming should be limited to 1.5 °C by 2100. Carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) are attractive as they can both reduce CO2 content and utilise CO2 as a carbon resource. However, in conventional CCU processes, CO2 needs first to be extracted and purified for the following utilisation. In contrast, the recently reported Integrated Carbon Capture and Utilisation (ICCU) was designed to realise the overall process in one reactor, where CO2 is captured by adsorbents (e.g., CaO) and utilised in-situ with the introduction of a reducing agent (e.g., H2). This ICCU technology can promote CO2 conversion with fewer intermediate steps, leading to a reduction in overall cost. Energy and economic analysis of ICCU are thus urgently required. According to several recent research, the operational cost of ICCU has been reported to be cheaper than that of CCU. However, a comprehensive view of ICCU is still expected due to further application. This paper focuses on comparing ICCU and conventional CCU processes based on Aspen simulations covering mass balance (i.e., CaCO3 consumption, purge production, annual CO production), energy balance, the total annual cost and the CO cost, etc. Analysis shows that the ICCU process can produce more CO (1.20 Mt year−1), less purge (0.21 Mt year−1), and less consumption of CaCO3 (0.62 Mt year−1) with higher energy efficiency (37.1 %) than the CCU process. The results also show that the total annual cost of ICCU is $867.07 million, corresponding to a total cost of CO of $720.25 per tonne. In contrast, CCU has higher costs, with a total annual cost of $1027.61 million and a total cost of CO of $1004.53 per tonne. The Cost of CO2 Avoided of ICCU (317.11$/ton) is much lower than that CCU (1230.27 $/ton). Therefore, ICCU was confirmed as a better choice for further industrial applications. In addition, H2 is shown to have a significant influence on economic performance, which remains a challenge for further application.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Fuel</journal><volume>332</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>125972</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0016-2361</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Integrated CO2 capture and utilisation; CO2 capture and utilisation; Techno-economic analysis; Aspen simulation</keywords><publishedDay>15</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2023</publishedYear><publishedDate>2023-01-15</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125972</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Engineering and Applied Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>EAAS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the China Scholarship Council (Student number: 201706880031). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 823745.</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-08-30T13:22:06.0080224</lastEdited><Created>2024-07-15T11:13:11.5078991</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Yuanting</firstname><surname>Qiao</surname><orcid>0000-0002-7741-9278</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Weishan</firstname><surname>Liu</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Ruonan</firstname><surname>Guo</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Shuzhuang</firstname><surname>Sun</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Shuming</firstname><surname>Zhang</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Josh J.</firstname><surname>Bailey</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Mengxiang</firstname><surname>Fang</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Chunfei</firstname><surname>Wu</surname><order>8</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>67096__31187__d75afd0d3069444d839927d4b98ae7c8.pdf</filename><originalFilename>67096.VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2024-08-30T13:20:11.5769982</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>2096217</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2022 The Authors.This is an open access article under the CC BY license.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
v2 67096 2024-07-15 Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production ceae57100ecb7c4b2883e29079a8985d 0000-0002-7741-9278 Yuanting Qiao Yuanting Qiao true false 2024-07-15 EAAS Currently, excessive CO2 emissions have become a global challenge due to their influence on the climate. According to the Paris Agreement, global warming should be limited to 1.5 °C by 2100. Carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) are attractive as they can both reduce CO2 content and utilise CO2 as a carbon resource. However, in conventional CCU processes, CO2 needs first to be extracted and purified for the following utilisation. In contrast, the recently reported Integrated Carbon Capture and Utilisation (ICCU) was designed to realise the overall process in one reactor, where CO2 is captured by adsorbents (e.g., CaO) and utilised in-situ with the introduction of a reducing agent (e.g., H2). This ICCU technology can promote CO2 conversion with fewer intermediate steps, leading to a reduction in overall cost. Energy and economic analysis of ICCU are thus urgently required. According to several recent research, the operational cost of ICCU has been reported to be cheaper than that of CCU. However, a comprehensive view of ICCU is still expected due to further application. This paper focuses on comparing ICCU and conventional CCU processes based on Aspen simulations covering mass balance (i.e., CaCO3 consumption, purge production, annual CO production), energy balance, the total annual cost and the CO cost, etc. Analysis shows that the ICCU process can produce more CO (1.20 Mt year−1), less purge (0.21 Mt year−1), and less consumption of CaCO3 (0.62 Mt year−1) with higher energy efficiency (37.1 %) than the CCU process. The results also show that the total annual cost of ICCU is $867.07 million, corresponding to a total cost of CO of $720.25 per tonne. In contrast, CCU has higher costs, with a total annual cost of $1027.61 million and a total cost of CO of $1004.53 per tonne. The Cost of CO2 Avoided of ICCU (317.11$/ton) is much lower than that CCU (1230.27 $/ton). Therefore, ICCU was confirmed as a better choice for further industrial applications. In addition, H2 is shown to have a significant influence on economic performance, which remains a challenge for further application. Journal Article Fuel 332 125972 Elsevier BV 0016-2361 Integrated CO2 capture and utilisation; CO2 capture and utilisation; Techno-economic analysis; Aspen simulation 15 1 2023 2023-01-15 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125972 COLLEGE NANME Engineering and Applied Sciences School COLLEGE CODE EAAS Swansea University The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the China Scholarship Council (Student number: 201706880031). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 823745. 2024-08-30T13:22:06.0080224 2024-07-15T11:13:11.5078991 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering Yuanting Qiao 0000-0002-7741-9278 1 Weishan Liu 2 Ruonan Guo 3 Shuzhuang Sun 4 Shuming Zhang 5 Josh J. Bailey 6 Mengxiang Fang 7 Chunfei Wu 8 67096__31187__d75afd0d3069444d839927d4b98ae7c8.pdf 67096.VoR.pdf 2024-08-30T13:20:11.5769982 Output 2096217 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2022 The Authors.This is an open access article under the CC BY license. true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production |
spellingShingle |
Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production Yuanting Qiao |
title_short |
Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production |
title_full |
Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production |
title_fullStr |
Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production |
title_full_unstemmed |
Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production |
title_sort |
Techno-economic analysis of integrated carbon capture and utilisation compared with carbon capture and utilisation with syngas production |
author_id_str_mv |
ceae57100ecb7c4b2883e29079a8985d |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
ceae57100ecb7c4b2883e29079a8985d_***_Yuanting Qiao |
author |
Yuanting Qiao |
author2 |
Yuanting Qiao Weishan Liu Ruonan Guo Shuzhuang Sun Shuming Zhang Josh J. Bailey Mengxiang Fang Chunfei Wu |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Fuel |
container_volume |
332 |
container_start_page |
125972 |
publishDate |
2023 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0016-2361 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125972 |
publisher |
Elsevier BV |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Currently, excessive CO2 emissions have become a global challenge due to their influence on the climate. According to the Paris Agreement, global warming should be limited to 1.5 °C by 2100. Carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) are attractive as they can both reduce CO2 content and utilise CO2 as a carbon resource. However, in conventional CCU processes, CO2 needs first to be extracted and purified for the following utilisation. In contrast, the recently reported Integrated Carbon Capture and Utilisation (ICCU) was designed to realise the overall process in one reactor, where CO2 is captured by adsorbents (e.g., CaO) and utilised in-situ with the introduction of a reducing agent (e.g., H2). This ICCU technology can promote CO2 conversion with fewer intermediate steps, leading to a reduction in overall cost. Energy and economic analysis of ICCU are thus urgently required. According to several recent research, the operational cost of ICCU has been reported to be cheaper than that of CCU. However, a comprehensive view of ICCU is still expected due to further application. This paper focuses on comparing ICCU and conventional CCU processes based on Aspen simulations covering mass balance (i.e., CaCO3 consumption, purge production, annual CO production), energy balance, the total annual cost and the CO cost, etc. Analysis shows that the ICCU process can produce more CO (1.20 Mt year−1), less purge (0.21 Mt year−1), and less consumption of CaCO3 (0.62 Mt year−1) with higher energy efficiency (37.1 %) than the CCU process. The results also show that the total annual cost of ICCU is $867.07 million, corresponding to a total cost of CO of $720.25 per tonne. In contrast, CCU has higher costs, with a total annual cost of $1027.61 million and a total cost of CO of $1004.53 per tonne. The Cost of CO2 Avoided of ICCU (317.11$/ton) is much lower than that CCU (1230.27 $/ton). Therefore, ICCU was confirmed as a better choice for further industrial applications. In addition, H2 is shown to have a significant influence on economic performance, which remains a challenge for further application. |
published_date |
2023-01-15T13:22:06Z |
_version_ |
1808815123223019520 |
score |
11.0241995 |