No Cover Image

Journal article 43 views

Effectiveness of digital health interventions for perinatal depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IFUNANYA CHINWEUBA, Judy Jenkins

Oxford Open Digital Health

Swansea University Authors: IFUNANYA CHINWEUBA, Judy Jenkins

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1093/oodh/oqae026

Abstract

Pregnant women and new mothers within one year after delivery are at a high risk of depression, yet many do not get the help they need due to wide reasons heralding stigma, access, cost, time, and shortage of human resources. Hence, compelling the exploration of alternate and potentially cost-effect...

Full description

Published in: Oxford Open Digital Health
ISSN: 2754-4591
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2024
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa67359
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: Pregnant women and new mothers within one year after delivery are at a high risk of depression, yet many do not get the help they need due to wide reasons heralding stigma, access, cost, time, and shortage of human resources. Hence, compelling the exploration of alternate and potentially cost-effective means of delivering care, including the leverage of digital tools. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of digital health interventions in reducing depressive symptoms among perinatal women. Literatures were sought from seven academic databases alongside the references of previous reviews. Included studies were all quantitative study types involving the use of digital health interventions for perinatal women not more than one-year post-delivery. Standardised mean difference and standard error were used to perform random-effect model meta-analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to determine certainty and modifiers of the findings, respectively. Forty-eight studies were included in this review with twenty-eight studies used for meta-analyses. Numerous digital channels were identified; however, none specified the use of a digital health theory in its development. The digital health interventions showed a small positive significant effect over the controls (standardised mean difference = 0.29, p = 0.003, I2 = 34%), and this was significantly influenced by intervention delivery and facilitation modes, time of initiation of the intervention, and period covered by the intervention. While digital health interventions may hold some potential for perinatal depression, scaling the interventions may be challenging sequel to overlooked influences from the interactions within the human-computer-society complex.
College: Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
Funders: Swansea University