No Cover Image

Journal article 1256 views

The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories

LINDSAY PRIOR, David Hughes, STEPHEN PECKHAM

Journal of Social Policy, Volume: 41, Issue: 02, Pages: 271 - 289

Swansea University Author: David Hughes

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

DOI (Published version): 10.1017/S0047279411000821

Abstract

This paper discusses the language of policy documents in the field of health care, and how ‘readings’ of such documents might be validated in the context of a narrative analysis. The focus is on a comparative study of UK health policy documents (<em>N</em> = 20) as produced by the variou...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Social Policy
Published: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2012
Online Access: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;aid=8474791
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa6770
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T11:55:26Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:34:18Z
id cronfa6770
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2014-03-31T13:56:21.6851885</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>6770</id><entry>2012-01-24</entry><title>The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>f1fbd458e3c75d8b597c0ac8036f2b88</sid><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Hughes</surname><name>David Hughes</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-01-24</date><deptcode>FGMHL</deptcode><abstract>This paper discusses the language of policy documents in the field of health care, and how &#x2018;readings&#x2019; of such documents might be validated in the context of a narrative analysis. The focus is on a comparative study of UK health policy documents (&lt;em&gt;N&lt;/em&gt; = 20) as produced by the various assemblies, governments and executives of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland during the period 2000&#x2013;09. The authors identify some key characteristics of narrative structure the go on to indicate how text-mining strategies allied with features of semantic and network analysis can be used to unravel the basic elements of policy stories and to facilitate the presentation of data in such a way that readers can verify the strengths of any given analysis &#x2013; with regard to claims concerning, say, the presence, absence or relative importance of key ideas and concepts. Readers can then &#x2018;see&#x2019; how the different components of any one story might fit together, and to get a sense of what has been excluded from the narrative as well as what has been included, and thereby assess the reliability and validity of interpretations that have been placed upon the data.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Social Policy</journal><volume>41</volume><journalNumber>02</journalNumber><paginationStart>271</paginationStart><paginationEnd>289</paginationEnd><publisher>Cambridge University Press, Cambridge</publisher><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>policy narratives, content analysis, documents</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2012</publishedYear><publishedDate>2012-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1017/S0047279411000821</doi><url>http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=8474791</url><notes>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-bidi-font-style: italic;"&gt;Prior, L. Hughes, D. and Peckham, S&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Medicine, Health and Life Science - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGMHL</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2014-03-31T13:56:21.6851885</lastEdited><Created>2012-01-24T00:12:51.1830000</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Health and Social Care - Public Health</level></path><authors><author><firstname>LINDSAY</firstname><surname>PRIOR</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Hughes</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>STEPHEN</firstname><surname>PECKHAM</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2014-03-31T13:56:21.6851885 v2 6770 2012-01-24 The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories f1fbd458e3c75d8b597c0ac8036f2b88 David Hughes David Hughes true false 2012-01-24 FGMHL This paper discusses the language of policy documents in the field of health care, and how ‘readings’ of such documents might be validated in the context of a narrative analysis. The focus is on a comparative study of UK health policy documents (<em>N</em> = 20) as produced by the various assemblies, governments and executives of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland during the period 2000–09. The authors identify some key characteristics of narrative structure the go on to indicate how text-mining strategies allied with features of semantic and network analysis can be used to unravel the basic elements of policy stories and to facilitate the presentation of data in such a way that readers can verify the strengths of any given analysis – with regard to claims concerning, say, the presence, absence or relative importance of key ideas and concepts. Readers can then ‘see’ how the different components of any one story might fit together, and to get a sense of what has been excluded from the narrative as well as what has been included, and thereby assess the reliability and validity of interpretations that have been placed upon the data. Journal Article Journal of Social Policy 41 02 271 289 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge policy narratives, content analysis, documents 31 12 2012 2012-12-31 10.1017/S0047279411000821 http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;aid=8474791 <p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-bidi-font-style: italic;">Prior, L. Hughes, D. and Peckham, S</span></p> COLLEGE NANME Medicine, Health and Life Science - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGMHL Swansea University 2014-03-31T13:56:21.6851885 2012-01-24T00:12:51.1830000 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Health and Social Care - Public Health LINDSAY PRIOR 1 David Hughes 2 STEPHEN PECKHAM 3
title The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories
spellingShingle The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories
David Hughes
title_short The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories
title_full The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories
title_fullStr The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories
title_full_unstemmed The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories
title_sort The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories
author_id_str_mv f1fbd458e3c75d8b597c0ac8036f2b88
author_id_fullname_str_mv f1fbd458e3c75d8b597c0ac8036f2b88_***_David Hughes
author David Hughes
author2 LINDSAY PRIOR
David Hughes
STEPHEN PECKHAM
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Social Policy
container_volume 41
container_issue 02
container_start_page 271
publishDate 2012
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0047279411000821
publisher Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Health and Social Care - Public Health{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Health and Social Care - Public Health
url http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;aid=8474791
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description This paper discusses the language of policy documents in the field of health care, and how ‘readings’ of such documents might be validated in the context of a narrative analysis. The focus is on a comparative study of UK health policy documents (<em>N</em> = 20) as produced by the various assemblies, governments and executives of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland during the period 2000–09. The authors identify some key characteristics of narrative structure the go on to indicate how text-mining strategies allied with features of semantic and network analysis can be used to unravel the basic elements of policy stories and to facilitate the presentation of data in such a way that readers can verify the strengths of any given analysis – with regard to claims concerning, say, the presence, absence or relative importance of key ideas and concepts. Readers can then ‘see’ how the different components of any one story might fit together, and to get a sense of what has been excluded from the narrative as well as what has been included, and thereby assess the reliability and validity of interpretations that have been placed upon the data.
published_date 2012-12-31T03:08:20Z
_version_ 1763749816713609216
score 11.016235

Similar Items