No Cover Image

Journal article 12 views

Trust, Competition, and Preventive Justice: Responding to Rule Violations in Sport

John William Devine Orcid Logo

The Journal of Ethics

Swansea University Author: John William Devine Orcid Logo

Abstract

Meaningful sporting competition rests on athletes complying with rules that they can easily violate undetected. From match-fixing, where players attempt to lose by illegitimate means, to doping, where players attempt to win by illegitimate means, sport is replete with trust-based rules. How should s...

Full description

Published in: The Journal of Ethics
Published:
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa67864
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2024-10-01T08:55:03Z
last_indexed 2024-10-01T08:55:03Z
id cronfa67864
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>67864</id><entry>2024-10-01</entry><title>Trust, Competition, and Preventive Justice: Responding to Rule Violations in Sport</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>f0448bdf1ad9d83e029d9b49ed910e33</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-0037-6556</ORCID><firstname>John William</firstname><surname>Devine</surname><name>John William Devine</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-10-01</date><deptcode>EAAS</deptcode><abstract>Meaningful sporting competition rests on athletes complying with rules that they can easily violate undetected. From match-fixing, where players attempt to lose by illegitimate means, to doping, where players attempt to win by illegitimate means, sport is replete with trust-based rules. How should sports authorities respond to the breach of such rules? I argue that trust-based rules pose a unique ethical challenge for sports authorities, and their violation requires a distinctive institutional response. Specifically, the principal response to such violations should be preventive rather than punitive. Sports authorities should mitigate the risk posed by violators of trust-based rules to the meaningfulness of future competition rather than punish violators for past wrongdoing. This paper develops a preventivejustice approach to the most routinely flouted, and widely discussed, variety of trust-based rule in sport – anti-doping rules. This argument illuminates the treatment of other types of trust-based rule in sport and trust-based rules in certain non-sporting rule-bound competitive contexts.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>The Journal of Ethics</journal><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>0</publishedDay><publishedMonth>0</publishedMonth><publishedYear>0</publishedYear><publishedDate>0001-01-01</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Engineering and Applied Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>EAAS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-10-01T15:24:13.3632106</lastEdited><Created>2024-10-01T09:49:06.3709049</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>John William</firstname><surname>Devine</surname><orcid>0000-0002-0037-6556</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling v2 67864 2024-10-01 Trust, Competition, and Preventive Justice: Responding to Rule Violations in Sport f0448bdf1ad9d83e029d9b49ed910e33 0000-0002-0037-6556 John William Devine John William Devine true false 2024-10-01 EAAS Meaningful sporting competition rests on athletes complying with rules that they can easily violate undetected. From match-fixing, where players attempt to lose by illegitimate means, to doping, where players attempt to win by illegitimate means, sport is replete with trust-based rules. How should sports authorities respond to the breach of such rules? I argue that trust-based rules pose a unique ethical challenge for sports authorities, and their violation requires a distinctive institutional response. Specifically, the principal response to such violations should be preventive rather than punitive. Sports authorities should mitigate the risk posed by violators of trust-based rules to the meaningfulness of future competition rather than punish violators for past wrongdoing. This paper develops a preventivejustice approach to the most routinely flouted, and widely discussed, variety of trust-based rule in sport – anti-doping rules. This argument illuminates the treatment of other types of trust-based rule in sport and trust-based rules in certain non-sporting rule-bound competitive contexts. Journal Article The Journal of Ethics 0 0 0 0001-01-01 COLLEGE NANME Engineering and Applied Sciences School COLLEGE CODE EAAS Swansea University 2024-10-01T15:24:13.3632106 2024-10-01T09:49:06.3709049 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences John William Devine 0000-0002-0037-6556 1
title Trust, Competition, and Preventive Justice: Responding to Rule Violations in Sport
spellingShingle Trust, Competition, and Preventive Justice: Responding to Rule Violations in Sport
John William Devine
title_short Trust, Competition, and Preventive Justice: Responding to Rule Violations in Sport
title_full Trust, Competition, and Preventive Justice: Responding to Rule Violations in Sport
title_fullStr Trust, Competition, and Preventive Justice: Responding to Rule Violations in Sport
title_full_unstemmed Trust, Competition, and Preventive Justice: Responding to Rule Violations in Sport
title_sort Trust, Competition, and Preventive Justice: Responding to Rule Violations in Sport
author_id_str_mv f0448bdf1ad9d83e029d9b49ed910e33
author_id_fullname_str_mv f0448bdf1ad9d83e029d9b49ed910e33_***_John William Devine
author John William Devine
author2 John William Devine
format Journal article
container_title The Journal of Ethics
institution Swansea University
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Meaningful sporting competition rests on athletes complying with rules that they can easily violate undetected. From match-fixing, where players attempt to lose by illegitimate means, to doping, where players attempt to win by illegitimate means, sport is replete with trust-based rules. How should sports authorities respond to the breach of such rules? I argue that trust-based rules pose a unique ethical challenge for sports authorities, and their violation requires a distinctive institutional response. Specifically, the principal response to such violations should be preventive rather than punitive. Sports authorities should mitigate the risk posed by violators of trust-based rules to the meaningfulness of future competition rather than punish violators for past wrongdoing. This paper develops a preventivejustice approach to the most routinely flouted, and widely discussed, variety of trust-based rule in sport – anti-doping rules. This argument illuminates the treatment of other types of trust-based rule in sport and trust-based rules in certain non-sporting rule-bound competitive contexts.
published_date 0001-01-01T15:24:11Z
_version_ 1811721907421052928
score 11.029921

Similar Items