Journal article 69 views
Asymmetric Biotic Interactions Cannot Be Inferred Without Accounting for Priority Effects
Ecology Letters, Volume: 27, Issue: 9
Swansea University Author: Konstans Wells
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.
Download (7.42MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1111/ele.14509
Abstract
Understanding biotic interactions is a crucial goal in community ecology and species distribution modelling, and large strides have been made towards improving multivariate computational methods with the aim of quantifying biotic interactions and improving predictions of species occurrence. Yet, whi...
Published in: | Ecology Letters |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1461-023X 1461-0248 |
Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa67897 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2024-10-02T19:20:36Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2024-10-02T19:20:36Z |
id |
cronfa67897 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>67897</id><entry>2024-10-02</entry><title>Asymmetric Biotic Interactions Cannot Be Inferred Without Accounting for Priority Effects</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>d18166c31e89833c55ef0f2cbb551243</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-0377-2463</ORCID><firstname>Konstans</firstname><surname>Wells</surname><name>Konstans Wells</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-10-02</date><deptcode>BGPS</deptcode><abstract>Understanding biotic interactions is a crucial goal in community ecology and species distribution modelling, and large strides have been made towards improving multivariate computational methods with the aim of quantifying biotic interactions and improving predictions of species occurrence. Yet, while considerable attention has been given to computational approaches and the interpretation of these quantitative tools, the importance of sampling design to reveal these biotic interactions has received little consideration. This study explores the influential role of priority effects, that is, the order of habitat colonisation, in shaping our ability to detect biotic interactions. Using a simple set of simulations, we demonstrate that commonly used cross-sectional co-occurrence data alone cannot be used to make reliable inferences on asymmetric biotic interactions, even if they perform well in predicting the occurrence of species. We then show how sampling designs that consider priority effects can recover the asymmetric effects that are lost when priority effects are ignored. Based on these findings, we urge for caution when drawing inferences on biotic interactions from cross-sectional binary co-occurrence data, and provide guidance on sampling designs that may provide the necessary data to tackle this longstanding challenge.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Ecology Letters</journal><volume>27</volume><journalNumber>9</journalNumber><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Wiley</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1461-023X</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1461-0248</issnElectronic><keywords>asymmetric interactions, biotic interactions, community ecology, priority effects, species interactions</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-09-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1111/ele.14509</doi><url/><notes>PERSPECTIVE</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Biosciences Geography and Physics School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>BGPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>Royal Society: RGS\R2\222152,
Australian Research Council: DE210101439</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-11-04T14:32:02.4671611</lastEdited><Created>2024-10-02T20:08:15.0479691</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Francisca</firstname><surname>Powell‐Romero</surname><orcid>0000-0001-9800-3100</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Konstans</firstname><surname>Wells</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0377-2463</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Nicholas J.</firstname><surname>Clark</surname><orcid>0000-0001-7131-3301</orcid><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>67897__31522__4ad148bb3b484cec8562c05b1c3acbb5.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Powell-Romero_etal_2024_EcolLett.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2024-10-02T20:15:44.5246881</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>7776198</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs><OutputDur><Id>282</Id><DataControllerName>Francisca Powell-Romero</DataControllerName><DataControllerOrcid>0000-0001-9800-3100</DataControllerOrcid><DataControllerEmail>francisca.powell@uq.net.au</DataControllerEmail><IsDataAvailableOnline>true</IsDataAvailableOnline><DataNotAvailableOnlineReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><DurUrl>https://zenodo.org/records/13363723</DurUrl><IsDurRestrictions>false</IsDurRestrictions><DurRestrictionReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><DurEmbargoDate xsi:nil="true"/></OutputDur><OutputDur><Id>283</Id><IsDataAvailableOnline>true</IsDataAvailableOnline><DataNotAvailableOnlineReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><DurUrl>https://zenodo.org/records/13363723</DurUrl><IsDurRestrictions>false</IsDurRestrictions><DurRestrictionReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><DurEmbargoDate xsi:nil="true"/></OutputDur></OutputDurs></rfc1807> |
spelling |
v2 67897 2024-10-02 Asymmetric Biotic Interactions Cannot Be Inferred Without Accounting for Priority Effects d18166c31e89833c55ef0f2cbb551243 0000-0003-0377-2463 Konstans Wells Konstans Wells true false 2024-10-02 BGPS Understanding biotic interactions is a crucial goal in community ecology and species distribution modelling, and large strides have been made towards improving multivariate computational methods with the aim of quantifying biotic interactions and improving predictions of species occurrence. Yet, while considerable attention has been given to computational approaches and the interpretation of these quantitative tools, the importance of sampling design to reveal these biotic interactions has received little consideration. This study explores the influential role of priority effects, that is, the order of habitat colonisation, in shaping our ability to detect biotic interactions. Using a simple set of simulations, we demonstrate that commonly used cross-sectional co-occurrence data alone cannot be used to make reliable inferences on asymmetric biotic interactions, even if they perform well in predicting the occurrence of species. We then show how sampling designs that consider priority effects can recover the asymmetric effects that are lost when priority effects are ignored. Based on these findings, we urge for caution when drawing inferences on biotic interactions from cross-sectional binary co-occurrence data, and provide guidance on sampling designs that may provide the necessary data to tackle this longstanding challenge. Journal Article Ecology Letters 27 9 Wiley 1461-023X 1461-0248 asymmetric interactions, biotic interactions, community ecology, priority effects, species interactions 1 9 2024 2024-09-01 10.1111/ele.14509 PERSPECTIVE COLLEGE NANME Biosciences Geography and Physics School COLLEGE CODE BGPS Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee Royal Society: RGS\R2\222152, Australian Research Council: DE210101439 2024-11-04T14:32:02.4671611 2024-10-02T20:08:15.0479691 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences Francisca Powell‐Romero 0000-0001-9800-3100 1 Konstans Wells 0000-0003-0377-2463 2 Nicholas J. Clark 0000-0001-7131-3301 3 67897__31522__4ad148bb3b484cec8562c05b1c3acbb5.pdf Powell-Romero_etal_2024_EcolLett.pdf 2024-10-02T20:15:44.5246881 Output 7776198 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License. true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ 282 Francisca Powell-Romero 0000-0001-9800-3100 francisca.powell@uq.net.au true https://zenodo.org/records/13363723 false 283 true https://zenodo.org/records/13363723 false |
title |
Asymmetric Biotic Interactions Cannot Be Inferred Without Accounting for Priority Effects |
spellingShingle |
Asymmetric Biotic Interactions Cannot Be Inferred Without Accounting for Priority Effects Konstans Wells |
title_short |
Asymmetric Biotic Interactions Cannot Be Inferred Without Accounting for Priority Effects |
title_full |
Asymmetric Biotic Interactions Cannot Be Inferred Without Accounting for Priority Effects |
title_fullStr |
Asymmetric Biotic Interactions Cannot Be Inferred Without Accounting for Priority Effects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Asymmetric Biotic Interactions Cannot Be Inferred Without Accounting for Priority Effects |
title_sort |
Asymmetric Biotic Interactions Cannot Be Inferred Without Accounting for Priority Effects |
author_id_str_mv |
d18166c31e89833c55ef0f2cbb551243 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
d18166c31e89833c55ef0f2cbb551243_***_Konstans Wells |
author |
Konstans Wells |
author2 |
Francisca Powell‐Romero Konstans Wells Nicholas J. Clark |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Ecology Letters |
container_volume |
27 |
container_issue |
9 |
publishDate |
2024 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
1461-023X 1461-0248 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/ele.14509 |
publisher |
Wiley |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Understanding biotic interactions is a crucial goal in community ecology and species distribution modelling, and large strides have been made towards improving multivariate computational methods with the aim of quantifying biotic interactions and improving predictions of species occurrence. Yet, while considerable attention has been given to computational approaches and the interpretation of these quantitative tools, the importance of sampling design to reveal these biotic interactions has received little consideration. This study explores the influential role of priority effects, that is, the order of habitat colonisation, in shaping our ability to detect biotic interactions. Using a simple set of simulations, we demonstrate that commonly used cross-sectional co-occurrence data alone cannot be used to make reliable inferences on asymmetric biotic interactions, even if they perform well in predicting the occurrence of species. We then show how sampling designs that consider priority effects can recover the asymmetric effects that are lost when priority effects are ignored. Based on these findings, we urge for caution when drawing inferences on biotic interactions from cross-sectional binary co-occurrence data, and provide guidance on sampling designs that may provide the necessary data to tackle this longstanding challenge. |
published_date |
2024-09-01T14:32:00Z |
_version_ |
1814802696457158656 |
score |
11.035634 |