Journal article 137 views
Hospital to community in Wales: What is the value of optometrists playing a greater role in managing neovascular AMD and glaucoma in primary care?
Barbara Ryan ,
Mari Jones ,
Pippa Anderson,
Rhiannon Reynolds,
Rebecca E. M. Nicholls,
Katherine Cullen ,
Mark Davies,
Rachel North,
Bablin Molik,
Carolyn Wallace
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Swansea University Authors: Mari Jones , Pippa Anderson, Katherine Cullen
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1111/opo.13397
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the value of enhanced optometric services for managing neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (nAMD) and glaucoma in primary care optometry services, instead of hospital eye services (HES). Methods: Seven enhanced optometric service pathways in primary care in Wales were a...
Published in: | Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0275-5408 1475-1313 |
Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa67964 |
Abstract: |
Purpose: To evaluate the value of enhanced optometric services for managing neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (nAMD) and glaucoma in primary care optometry services, instead of hospital eye services (HES). Methods: Seven enhanced optometric service pathways in primary care in Wales were assessed with a mixed‐methods approach: three for nAMD and four for glaucoma. The methods were a patient‐related experience measure (PREM), a Realist Review and Evaluation involving both patients and staff, a discrete event simulation model estimating the economic impact of the pathways and a workforce survey of optometrists to gauge capability and capacity. Results: Patient‐related experience measure responses (802) indicated that primary care experience was comparable to that of HES. Utilising enhanced optometric services in primary care resulted in reduced wait times compared with HES, with suspected nAMD shortened to 4–5 days and glaucoma monitoring to 5 days. Waiting lists were dramatically reduced with primary care‐based services to just three people waiting for nAMD and five for glaucoma, compared with 216 and 5691 people, respectively, in HES. Consultant ophthalmologist time was reduced from 57% to 15%–16% for nAMD services and from 48% to 22%–23% for glaucoma services. Integrating enhanced optometric services into primary care incurred a similar cost. The workforce survey confirms that optometrists possess the skills and qualifications and are willing to deliver these enhanced optometric services. The Realist Review and Evaluation revealed that clear patient communication, effective coordination and strong interprofessional communication between optometrists and ophthalmologists along with a shared electronic record are crucial to the success of this change. Conclusion: Providing enhanced optometric services in primary care for nAMD and glaucoma brings substantial benefits for the UK National Health Service and patients, including reduced waiting times, waiting lists and released HES capacity. The success of this transition hinges on clear patient communication, administrative co‐ordination and effective interprofessional communication. |
---|---|
Keywords: |
Age‐related maculopathy, enhanced optometric service, glaucoma, hospital eye services, primary care, service pathways, value |
College: |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
Funders: |
This research was funded by Health and Care Research Wales, Research for Patient Benefit-19-1639. |