Journal article 615 views 130 downloads
Statutory trusts, planning law and open spaces: R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council
Trusts & Trustees, Volume: 31, Issue: 2, Pages: 68 - 72
Swansea University Author: Lloyd Brown
-
PDF | Version of Record
© The Author(s) (2024). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0).
Download (803.78KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1093/tandt/ttae090
Abstract
This case comment argues that the Supreme Court decision in R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council [2023] UKSC 8 is significant for two reasons. From a technical standpoint, the judgment rightly preserves the public recreation rights afforded under a statutory trust following an unlawful...
| Published in: | Trusts & Trustees |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1363-1780 1752-2110 |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press (OUP)
2025
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa68138 |
| first_indexed |
2024-11-01T11:32:35Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2025-02-26T05:54:13Z |
| id |
cronfa68138 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-02-25T12:48:20.7136074</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>68138</id><entry>2024-11-01</entry><title>Statutory trusts, planning law and open spaces: R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>786add39c141818cbb959ce7277bbd69</sid><firstname>Lloyd</firstname><surname>Brown</surname><name>Lloyd Brown</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-11-01</date><deptcode>HRCL</deptcode><abstract>This case comment argues that the Supreme Court decision in R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council [2023] UKSC 8 is significant for two reasons. From a technical standpoint, the judgment rightly preserves the public recreation rights afforded under a statutory trust following an unlawful disposal by a council to a private developer. Not only does this show that statutory trusts bestow subsisting rights, but that public bodies must comply with the statutory schemes imposed upon them. From a public policy standpoint, the ruling also protects local communities’ rights to open spaces and the environment over private development.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Trusts & Trustees</journal><volume>31</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>68</paginationStart><paginationEnd>72</paginationEnd><publisher>Oxford University Press (OUP)</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1363-1780</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1752-2110</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2025</publishedYear><publishedDate>2025-03-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1093/tandt/ttae090</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HRCL</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal)</apcterm><funders>Swansea University</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-02-25T12:48:20.7136074</lastEdited><Created>2024-11-01T11:28:58.4078788</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Lloyd</firstname><surname>Brown</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>68138__33145__38ebb36d27e644acbfe4ffa3269a04d7.pdf</filename><originalFilename>68138.VOR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2024-12-16T13:35:21.4295257</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>823074</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© The Author(s) (2024). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
2025-02-25T12:48:20.7136074 v2 68138 2024-11-01 Statutory trusts, planning law and open spaces: R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council 786add39c141818cbb959ce7277bbd69 Lloyd Brown Lloyd Brown true false 2024-11-01 HRCL This case comment argues that the Supreme Court decision in R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council [2023] UKSC 8 is significant for two reasons. From a technical standpoint, the judgment rightly preserves the public recreation rights afforded under a statutory trust following an unlawful disposal by a council to a private developer. Not only does this show that statutory trusts bestow subsisting rights, but that public bodies must comply with the statutory schemes imposed upon them. From a public policy standpoint, the ruling also protects local communities’ rights to open spaces and the environment over private development. Journal Article Trusts & Trustees 31 2 68 72 Oxford University Press (OUP) 1363-1780 1752-2110 1 3 2025 2025-03-01 10.1093/tandt/ttae090 COLLEGE NANME Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School COLLEGE CODE HRCL Swansea University SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal) Swansea University 2025-02-25T12:48:20.7136074 2024-11-01T11:28:58.4078788 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Lloyd Brown 1 68138__33145__38ebb36d27e644acbfe4ffa3269a04d7.pdf 68138.VOR.pdf 2024-12-16T13:35:21.4295257 Output 823074 application/pdf Version of Record true © The Author(s) (2024). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0). true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| title |
Statutory trusts, planning law and open spaces: R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council |
| spellingShingle |
Statutory trusts, planning law and open spaces: R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council Lloyd Brown |
| title_short |
Statutory trusts, planning law and open spaces: R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council |
| title_full |
Statutory trusts, planning law and open spaces: R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council |
| title_fullStr |
Statutory trusts, planning law and open spaces: R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Statutory trusts, planning law and open spaces: R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council |
| title_sort |
Statutory trusts, planning law and open spaces: R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council |
| author_id_str_mv |
786add39c141818cbb959ce7277bbd69 |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
786add39c141818cbb959ce7277bbd69_***_Lloyd Brown |
| author |
Lloyd Brown |
| author2 |
Lloyd Brown |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
Trusts & Trustees |
| container_volume |
31 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| container_start_page |
68 |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| issn |
1363-1780 1752-2110 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1093/tandt/ttae090 |
| publisher |
Oxford University Press (OUP) |
| college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| department_str |
Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law |
| document_store_str |
1 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
This case comment argues that the Supreme Court decision in R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council [2023] UKSC 8 is significant for two reasons. From a technical standpoint, the judgment rightly preserves the public recreation rights afforded under a statutory trust following an unlawful disposal by a council to a private developer. Not only does this show that statutory trusts bestow subsisting rights, but that public bodies must comply with the statutory schemes imposed upon them. From a public policy standpoint, the ruling also protects local communities’ rights to open spaces and the environment over private development. |
| published_date |
2025-03-01T05:25:03Z |
| _version_ |
1856805277079175168 |
| score |
11.09611 |

