Journal article 17 views 3 downloads
Access to diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies for patients with cancer in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus: a comprehensive analysis
The Lancet Oncology, Volume: 25, Issue: 11, Pages: 1487 - 1495
Swansea University Author: Richard Hugtenburg
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Download (1.02MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00452-2
Abstract
BackgroundOnly 10–40% of patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries were able to access curative or palliative radiotherapy in 2015. We aimed to assess the current status of diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy services in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and th...
Published in: | The Lancet Oncology |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1470-2045 |
Published: |
Elsevier BV
2024
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa68198 |
first_indexed |
2024-11-06T16:44:58Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2025-01-16T20:49:09Z |
id |
cronfa68198 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-01-16T12:07:40.6188870</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>68198</id><entry>2024-11-06</entry><title>Access to diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies for patients with cancer in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus: a comprehensive analysis</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>efd2f52ea19cb047e01a01e6fa6fa54c</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-0352-9607</ORCID><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Hugtenburg</surname><name>Richard Hugtenburg</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-11-06</date><deptcode>MEDS</deptcode><abstract>BackgroundOnly 10–40% of patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries were able to access curative or palliative radiotherapy in 2015. We aimed to assess the current status of diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy services in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus by collecting and analysing local data.MethodsThis Access to Radiotherapy (ART) comprehensive analysis used data from 12 countries: the three Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), two countries in eastern Europe (Moldova and Ukraine), four countries in central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan), and three countries in the Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia), referred to here as the ART countries. We were not able to obtain engagement from Turkmenistan. The primary outcome was to update the extent of shortfalls in the availability of diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies and radiotherapy human resources for patients with cancer in former Soviet Union countries. Following the methods of previous similar studies, we developed three questionnaires—targeted towards radiation oncologists, regulatory authorities, and researchers—requesting detailed information on the availability of these resources. Authors from participating countries sent two copies of the appropriate questionnaire to each of 107 identified institutions and coordinated data collection at the national level. Questionnaires were distributed in English and Russian and responses in both languages were accepted. Two virtual meetings held on May 30 and June 1, 2022, were followed by an in-person workshop held in Almaty, Kazakhstan, in September, 2022, attended by representatives from all participating countries, to discuss and further validate the data submitted up to this point. The data were collected on a dedicated web page, developed by the International Cancer Expert Corps, and were then extracted and analysed.FindingsData were collected between May 10 and Nov 30, 2022. 81 (76%) of the 107 institutions contacted, representing all 12 ART countries, submitted 167 completed questionnaires. The Baltic countries, which are defined as high-income countries, had more diagnostic imaging equipment and radiotherapy human resources (eg, Latvia [1·74] and Lithuania [1·47] have a much higher number of radiation oncologists per 100 000 population than the other ART countries, all of which had <1 radiation oncologist per 100 000 population) and greater radiotherapy technological capacities (higher numbers of linear accelerators and, similar to Georgia, high total external beam radiotherapy capacity) than the other ART countries, as well as high cancer detection rates (Latvia 311 cases per 100 000 population, Lithuania 292, and Estonia 288 vs, for example, 178 in Armenia, 144 in Ukraine, and 72 in Kazakhstan) and low cancer mortality-to-cancer incidence ratios (Estonia 0·43, Latvia 0·49, and Lithuania 0·48; lower than all but Kazakhstan [0·41]). The highest cancer mortality-to-cancer incidence ratios were reported by Moldova (0·71) and Georgia (0·74).InterpretationOur findings show that the number of cancer cases, availability of diagnostic imaging equipment, radiation oncologists and radiotherapy capacity, and cancer mortality-to-cancer incidence ratios all vary substantially across the countries studied, with the three high-income, well resourced Baltic countries performing better in all metrics than the included countries in eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus. These data highlight the challenges faced by many countries in this study, and might help to justify increased investment of financial, human, and technological resources, with the aim to improve cancer treatment outcomes.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>The Lancet Oncology</journal><volume>25</volume><journalNumber>11</journalNumber><paginationStart>1487</paginationStart><paginationEnd>1495</paginationEnd><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1470-2045</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>11</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-11-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00452-2</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Medical School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>MEDS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Not Required</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-01-16T12:07:40.6188870</lastEdited><Created>2024-11-06T14:44:25.5260379</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">Swansea University Medical School - Medical Physics</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Manjit</firstname><surname>Dosanjh</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Vesna</firstname><surname>Gershan</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Eugenia C</firstname><surname>Wendling</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Jamal S</firstname><surname>Khader</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Taofeeq A</firstname><surname>Ige</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Mimoza</firstname><surname>Ristova</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Hugtenburg</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0352-9607</orcid><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Petya</firstname><surname>Georgieva</surname><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>C Norman</firstname><surname>Coleman</surname><order>9</order></author><author><firstname>David A</firstname><surname>Pistenmaa</surname><order>10</order></author><author><firstname>Gohar H</firstname><surname>Hovhannisyan</surname><order>11</order></author><author><firstname>Tatul</firstname><surname>Saghatelyan</surname><order>12</order></author><author><firstname>Kamal</firstname><surname>Kazimov</surname><order>13</order></author><author><firstname>Rovshan</firstname><surname>Rzayev</surname><order>14</order></author><author><firstname>Gulam R</firstname><surname>Babayev</surname><order>15</order></author><author><firstname>Mirzali M</firstname><surname>Aliyev</surname><order>16</order></author><author><firstname>Eduard</firstname><surname>Gershkevitsh</surname><order>17</order></author><author><firstname>Irina</firstname><surname>Khomeriki</surname><order>18</order></author><author><firstname>Lily</firstname><surname>Petriashvili</surname><order>19</order></author><author><firstname>Maia</firstname><surname>Topeshashvili</surname><order>20</order></author><author><firstname>Raushan</firstname><surname>Zakirova</surname><order>21</order></author><author><firstname>Aigerim</firstname><surname>Rakhimova</surname><order>22</order></author><author><firstname>Natalya</firstname><surname>Karnakova</surname><order>23</order></author><author><firstname>Aralbaev</firstname><surname>Rakhatbek</surname><order>24</order></author><author><firstname>Narynbek</firstname><surname>Kazybaev</surname><order>25</order></author><author><firstname>Oksana</firstname><surname>Bondareva</surname><order>26</order></author><author><firstname>Kristaps</firstname><surname>Palskis</surname><order>27</order></author><author><firstname>Gaļina</firstname><surname>Boka</surname><order>28</order></author><author><firstname>Erika</firstname><surname>Korobeinikova</surname><order>29</order></author><author><firstname>Linas</firstname><surname>Kudrevicius</surname><order>30</order></author><author><firstname>Ion</firstname><surname>Apostol</surname><order>31</order></author><author><firstname>Ludmila V</firstname><surname>Eftodiev</surname><order>32</order></author><author><firstname>Alfreda</firstname><surname>Rosca</surname><order>33</order></author><author><firstname>Galina</firstname><surname>Rusnac</surname><order>34</order></author><author><firstname>Mukhabatsho</firstname><surname>Khikmatov</surname><order>35</order></author><author><firstname>Sergii</firstname><surname>Luchkovskyi</surname><order>36</order></author><author><firstname>Yuliia</firstname><surname>Severyn</surname><order>37</order></author><author><firstname>Jamshid M</firstname><surname>Alimov</surname><order>38</order></author><author><firstname>Munojat</firstname><surname>Ismailova</surname><order>39</order></author><author><firstname>Suvsana M</firstname><surname>Talibova</surname><order>40</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>68198__33353__79ab7e3de62a403b8b91d501e2af30e1.pdf</filename><originalFilename>68198.VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2025-01-16T12:04:25.3011675</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1073923</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2024 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2025-01-16T12:07:40.6188870 v2 68198 2024-11-06 Access to diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies for patients with cancer in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus: a comprehensive analysis efd2f52ea19cb047e01a01e6fa6fa54c 0000-0003-0352-9607 Richard Hugtenburg Richard Hugtenburg true false 2024-11-06 MEDS BackgroundOnly 10–40% of patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries were able to access curative or palliative radiotherapy in 2015. We aimed to assess the current status of diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy services in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus by collecting and analysing local data.MethodsThis Access to Radiotherapy (ART) comprehensive analysis used data from 12 countries: the three Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), two countries in eastern Europe (Moldova and Ukraine), four countries in central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan), and three countries in the Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia), referred to here as the ART countries. We were not able to obtain engagement from Turkmenistan. The primary outcome was to update the extent of shortfalls in the availability of diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies and radiotherapy human resources for patients with cancer in former Soviet Union countries. Following the methods of previous similar studies, we developed three questionnaires—targeted towards radiation oncologists, regulatory authorities, and researchers—requesting detailed information on the availability of these resources. Authors from participating countries sent two copies of the appropriate questionnaire to each of 107 identified institutions and coordinated data collection at the national level. Questionnaires were distributed in English and Russian and responses in both languages were accepted. Two virtual meetings held on May 30 and June 1, 2022, were followed by an in-person workshop held in Almaty, Kazakhstan, in September, 2022, attended by representatives from all participating countries, to discuss and further validate the data submitted up to this point. The data were collected on a dedicated web page, developed by the International Cancer Expert Corps, and were then extracted and analysed.FindingsData were collected between May 10 and Nov 30, 2022. 81 (76%) of the 107 institutions contacted, representing all 12 ART countries, submitted 167 completed questionnaires. The Baltic countries, which are defined as high-income countries, had more diagnostic imaging equipment and radiotherapy human resources (eg, Latvia [1·74] and Lithuania [1·47] have a much higher number of radiation oncologists per 100 000 population than the other ART countries, all of which had <1 radiation oncologist per 100 000 population) and greater radiotherapy technological capacities (higher numbers of linear accelerators and, similar to Georgia, high total external beam radiotherapy capacity) than the other ART countries, as well as high cancer detection rates (Latvia 311 cases per 100 000 population, Lithuania 292, and Estonia 288 vs, for example, 178 in Armenia, 144 in Ukraine, and 72 in Kazakhstan) and low cancer mortality-to-cancer incidence ratios (Estonia 0·43, Latvia 0·49, and Lithuania 0·48; lower than all but Kazakhstan [0·41]). The highest cancer mortality-to-cancer incidence ratios were reported by Moldova (0·71) and Georgia (0·74).InterpretationOur findings show that the number of cancer cases, availability of diagnostic imaging equipment, radiation oncologists and radiotherapy capacity, and cancer mortality-to-cancer incidence ratios all vary substantially across the countries studied, with the three high-income, well resourced Baltic countries performing better in all metrics than the included countries in eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus. These data highlight the challenges faced by many countries in this study, and might help to justify increased investment of financial, human, and technological resources, with the aim to improve cancer treatment outcomes. Journal Article The Lancet Oncology 25 11 1487 1495 Elsevier BV 1470-2045 1 11 2024 2024-11-01 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00452-2 COLLEGE NANME Medical School COLLEGE CODE MEDS Swansea University Not Required 2025-01-16T12:07:40.6188870 2024-11-06T14:44:25.5260379 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Swansea University Medical School - Medical Physics Manjit Dosanjh 1 Vesna Gershan 2 Eugenia C Wendling 3 Jamal S Khader 4 Taofeeq A Ige 5 Mimoza Ristova 6 Richard Hugtenburg 0000-0003-0352-9607 7 Petya Georgieva 8 C Norman Coleman 9 David A Pistenmaa 10 Gohar H Hovhannisyan 11 Tatul Saghatelyan 12 Kamal Kazimov 13 Rovshan Rzayev 14 Gulam R Babayev 15 Mirzali M Aliyev 16 Eduard Gershkevitsh 17 Irina Khomeriki 18 Lily Petriashvili 19 Maia Topeshashvili 20 Raushan Zakirova 21 Aigerim Rakhimova 22 Natalya Karnakova 23 Aralbaev Rakhatbek 24 Narynbek Kazybaev 25 Oksana Bondareva 26 Kristaps Palskis 27 Gaļina Boka 28 Erika Korobeinikova 29 Linas Kudrevicius 30 Ion Apostol 31 Ludmila V Eftodiev 32 Alfreda Rosca 33 Galina Rusnac 34 Mukhabatsho Khikmatov 35 Sergii Luchkovskyi 36 Yuliia Severyn 37 Jamshid M Alimov 38 Munojat Ismailova 39 Suvsana M Talibova 40 68198__33353__79ab7e3de62a403b8b91d501e2af30e1.pdf 68198.VoR.pdf 2025-01-16T12:04:25.3011675 Output 1073923 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2024 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
Access to diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies for patients with cancer in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus: a comprehensive analysis |
spellingShingle |
Access to diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies for patients with cancer in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus: a comprehensive analysis Richard Hugtenburg |
title_short |
Access to diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies for patients with cancer in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus: a comprehensive analysis |
title_full |
Access to diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies for patients with cancer in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus: a comprehensive analysis |
title_fullStr |
Access to diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies for patients with cancer in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus: a comprehensive analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Access to diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies for patients with cancer in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus: a comprehensive analysis |
title_sort |
Access to diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies for patients with cancer in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus: a comprehensive analysis |
author_id_str_mv |
efd2f52ea19cb047e01a01e6fa6fa54c |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
efd2f52ea19cb047e01a01e6fa6fa54c_***_Richard Hugtenburg |
author |
Richard Hugtenburg |
author2 |
Manjit Dosanjh Vesna Gershan Eugenia C Wendling Jamal S Khader Taofeeq A Ige Mimoza Ristova Richard Hugtenburg Petya Georgieva C Norman Coleman David A Pistenmaa Gohar H Hovhannisyan Tatul Saghatelyan Kamal Kazimov Rovshan Rzayev Gulam R Babayev Mirzali M Aliyev Eduard Gershkevitsh Irina Khomeriki Lily Petriashvili Maia Topeshashvili Raushan Zakirova Aigerim Rakhimova Natalya Karnakova Aralbaev Rakhatbek Narynbek Kazybaev Oksana Bondareva Kristaps Palskis Gaļina Boka Erika Korobeinikova Linas Kudrevicius Ion Apostol Ludmila V Eftodiev Alfreda Rosca Galina Rusnac Mukhabatsho Khikmatov Sergii Luchkovskyi Yuliia Severyn Jamshid M Alimov Munojat Ismailova Suvsana M Talibova |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
The Lancet Oncology |
container_volume |
25 |
container_issue |
11 |
container_start_page |
1487 |
publishDate |
2024 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
1470-2045 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00452-2 |
publisher |
Elsevier BV |
college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
department_str |
Swansea University Medical School - Medical Physics{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Swansea University Medical School - Medical Physics |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
BackgroundOnly 10–40% of patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries were able to access curative or palliative radiotherapy in 2015. We aimed to assess the current status of diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy services in the Baltic countries, eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus by collecting and analysing local data.MethodsThis Access to Radiotherapy (ART) comprehensive analysis used data from 12 countries: the three Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), two countries in eastern Europe (Moldova and Ukraine), four countries in central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan), and three countries in the Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia), referred to here as the ART countries. We were not able to obtain engagement from Turkmenistan. The primary outcome was to update the extent of shortfalls in the availability of diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy technologies and radiotherapy human resources for patients with cancer in former Soviet Union countries. Following the methods of previous similar studies, we developed three questionnaires—targeted towards radiation oncologists, regulatory authorities, and researchers—requesting detailed information on the availability of these resources. Authors from participating countries sent two copies of the appropriate questionnaire to each of 107 identified institutions and coordinated data collection at the national level. Questionnaires were distributed in English and Russian and responses in both languages were accepted. Two virtual meetings held on May 30 and June 1, 2022, were followed by an in-person workshop held in Almaty, Kazakhstan, in September, 2022, attended by representatives from all participating countries, to discuss and further validate the data submitted up to this point. The data were collected on a dedicated web page, developed by the International Cancer Expert Corps, and were then extracted and analysed.FindingsData were collected between May 10 and Nov 30, 2022. 81 (76%) of the 107 institutions contacted, representing all 12 ART countries, submitted 167 completed questionnaires. The Baltic countries, which are defined as high-income countries, had more diagnostic imaging equipment and radiotherapy human resources (eg, Latvia [1·74] and Lithuania [1·47] have a much higher number of radiation oncologists per 100 000 population than the other ART countries, all of which had <1 radiation oncologist per 100 000 population) and greater radiotherapy technological capacities (higher numbers of linear accelerators and, similar to Georgia, high total external beam radiotherapy capacity) than the other ART countries, as well as high cancer detection rates (Latvia 311 cases per 100 000 population, Lithuania 292, and Estonia 288 vs, for example, 178 in Armenia, 144 in Ukraine, and 72 in Kazakhstan) and low cancer mortality-to-cancer incidence ratios (Estonia 0·43, Latvia 0·49, and Lithuania 0·48; lower than all but Kazakhstan [0·41]). The highest cancer mortality-to-cancer incidence ratios were reported by Moldova (0·71) and Georgia (0·74).InterpretationOur findings show that the number of cancer cases, availability of diagnostic imaging equipment, radiation oncologists and radiotherapy capacity, and cancer mortality-to-cancer incidence ratios all vary substantially across the countries studied, with the three high-income, well resourced Baltic countries performing better in all metrics than the included countries in eastern Europe, central Asia, and the Caucasus. These data highlight the challenges faced by many countries in this study, and might help to justify increased investment of financial, human, and technological resources, with the aim to improve cancer treatment outcomes. |
published_date |
2024-11-01T02:56:14Z |
_version_ |
1822006679184605184 |
score |
11.048042 |