Journal article 185 views 32 downloads
The use of Simulated Observations in Medical Simulation and its effect on perceived realism: A pilot project
MedEdPublish, Volume: 13, Start page: 66
Swansea University Author:
Suresh Gopala Pillai
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2024 Ainsworth J et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Download (1.77MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.12688/mep.19719.2
Abstract
IntroductionSimulation is an effective teaching method with increasing growth and recognition and refers to the artificial representation of a real-life scenario. The aim of this study was to compare simulation with and without the use of a simulated observations monitor and to investigate differenc...
| Published in: | MedEdPublish |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2312-7996 |
| Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2024
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa70778 |
| first_indexed |
2025-10-28T16:01:36Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2025-11-14T12:47:33Z |
| id |
cronfa70778 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-11-13T12:46:21.4672060</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>70778</id><entry>2025-10-28</entry><title>The use of Simulated Observations in Medical Simulation and its effect on perceived realism: A pilot project</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>f567f8d5db61d62ef08e811676fd8430</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-9753-6949</ORCID><firstname>Suresh</firstname><surname>Gopala Pillai</surname><name>Suresh Gopala Pillai</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2025-10-28</date><deptcode>MEDS</deptcode><abstract>IntroductionSimulation is an effective teaching method with increasing growth and recognition and refers to the artificial representation of a real-life scenario. The aim of this study was to compare simulation with and without the use of a simulated observations monitor and to investigate differences in students’ impression of realism, engagement, learning, and enjoyment.MethodsSimulation sessions were delivered to second and third-year Swansea University Medical Students, and a total of 15 students were included. Students carried out 2–3 scenarios each with and without the use of a simulated observations monitor. Data collection was conducted via student surveys and a joint interview.ResultsAll students had an increased sense of realism with the use of the simulated observations monitor, feeling a closer resemblance to what would be experienced in clinical practice. They felt this improved their learning, making them more prepared for the real-life scenario. The monitor was more dynamic, responding to their interventions, helping them maintain focus and engagement throughout. A key theme was the reduction of interruptions or deviations from the scenario to communicate with the examiner or ask for observations. The visual and audible affects provided additional stimuli, adding to the realistic nature of the simulation.DiscussionSimulation has been shown to be a useful education tool, but there is less evidence to support the use of higher fidelity over lower fidelity simulation. The terms are often used inconsistently, and many factors affect the students’ perceived sense of realism. This study shows that the addition of a simple device such as the simulated observations monitor can produce a higher level of fidelity, particularly in terms of the stimuli provided and student perceptions of realism, which may be effective in improving engagement with the simulation, learning, and aid recall when presented with similar scenarios in a real-life situation.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>MedEdPublish</journal><volume>13</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>66</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>F1000 Research Ltd</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>2312-7996</issnElectronic><keywords>Simulation, medical simulation, medical education, simulation fidelity, perceived realism</keywords><publishedDay>5</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-06-05</publishedDate><doi>10.12688/mep.19719.2</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Medical School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>MEDS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-11-13T12:46:21.4672060</lastEdited><Created>2025-10-28T09:38:55.3673273</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">Swansea University Medical School - Biomedical Science</level></path><authors><author><firstname>James</firstname><surname>Ainsworth</surname><orcid>0000-0001-5571-1983</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Sounder</firstname><surname>Perumal</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Suresh</firstname><surname>Gopala Pillai</surname><orcid>0000-0002-9753-6949</orcid><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>70778__35618__b73706aa494e4bc49ed483110c195846.pdf</filename><originalFilename>70778.VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2025-11-13T12:43:32.9024182</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1856754</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2024 Ainsworth J et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
2025-11-13T12:46:21.4672060 v2 70778 2025-10-28 The use of Simulated Observations in Medical Simulation and its effect on perceived realism: A pilot project f567f8d5db61d62ef08e811676fd8430 0000-0002-9753-6949 Suresh Gopala Pillai Suresh Gopala Pillai true false 2025-10-28 MEDS IntroductionSimulation is an effective teaching method with increasing growth and recognition and refers to the artificial representation of a real-life scenario. The aim of this study was to compare simulation with and without the use of a simulated observations monitor and to investigate differences in students’ impression of realism, engagement, learning, and enjoyment.MethodsSimulation sessions were delivered to second and third-year Swansea University Medical Students, and a total of 15 students were included. Students carried out 2–3 scenarios each with and without the use of a simulated observations monitor. Data collection was conducted via student surveys and a joint interview.ResultsAll students had an increased sense of realism with the use of the simulated observations monitor, feeling a closer resemblance to what would be experienced in clinical practice. They felt this improved their learning, making them more prepared for the real-life scenario. The monitor was more dynamic, responding to their interventions, helping them maintain focus and engagement throughout. A key theme was the reduction of interruptions or deviations from the scenario to communicate with the examiner or ask for observations. The visual and audible affects provided additional stimuli, adding to the realistic nature of the simulation.DiscussionSimulation has been shown to be a useful education tool, but there is less evidence to support the use of higher fidelity over lower fidelity simulation. The terms are often used inconsistently, and many factors affect the students’ perceived sense of realism. This study shows that the addition of a simple device such as the simulated observations monitor can produce a higher level of fidelity, particularly in terms of the stimuli provided and student perceptions of realism, which may be effective in improving engagement with the simulation, learning, and aid recall when presented with similar scenarios in a real-life situation. Journal Article MedEdPublish 13 66 F1000 Research Ltd 2312-7996 Simulation, medical simulation, medical education, simulation fidelity, perceived realism 5 6 2024 2024-06-05 10.12688/mep.19719.2 COLLEGE NANME Medical School COLLEGE CODE MEDS Swansea University 2025-11-13T12:46:21.4672060 2025-10-28T09:38:55.3673273 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Swansea University Medical School - Biomedical Science James Ainsworth 0000-0001-5571-1983 1 Sounder Perumal 2 Suresh Gopala Pillai 0000-0002-9753-6949 3 70778__35618__b73706aa494e4bc49ed483110c195846.pdf 70778.VoR.pdf 2025-11-13T12:43:32.9024182 Output 1856754 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2024 Ainsworth J et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| title |
The use of Simulated Observations in Medical Simulation and its effect on perceived realism: A pilot project |
| spellingShingle |
The use of Simulated Observations in Medical Simulation and its effect on perceived realism: A pilot project Suresh Gopala Pillai |
| title_short |
The use of Simulated Observations in Medical Simulation and its effect on perceived realism: A pilot project |
| title_full |
The use of Simulated Observations in Medical Simulation and its effect on perceived realism: A pilot project |
| title_fullStr |
The use of Simulated Observations in Medical Simulation and its effect on perceived realism: A pilot project |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The use of Simulated Observations in Medical Simulation and its effect on perceived realism: A pilot project |
| title_sort |
The use of Simulated Observations in Medical Simulation and its effect on perceived realism: A pilot project |
| author_id_str_mv |
f567f8d5db61d62ef08e811676fd8430 |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
f567f8d5db61d62ef08e811676fd8430_***_Suresh Gopala Pillai |
| author |
Suresh Gopala Pillai |
| author2 |
James Ainsworth Sounder Perumal Suresh Gopala Pillai |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
MedEdPublish |
| container_volume |
13 |
| container_start_page |
66 |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| issn |
2312-7996 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.12688/mep.19719.2 |
| publisher |
F1000 Research Ltd |
| college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| department_str |
Swansea University Medical School - Biomedical Science{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Swansea University Medical School - Biomedical Science |
| document_store_str |
1 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
IntroductionSimulation is an effective teaching method with increasing growth and recognition and refers to the artificial representation of a real-life scenario. The aim of this study was to compare simulation with and without the use of a simulated observations monitor and to investigate differences in students’ impression of realism, engagement, learning, and enjoyment.MethodsSimulation sessions were delivered to second and third-year Swansea University Medical Students, and a total of 15 students were included. Students carried out 2–3 scenarios each with and without the use of a simulated observations monitor. Data collection was conducted via student surveys and a joint interview.ResultsAll students had an increased sense of realism with the use of the simulated observations monitor, feeling a closer resemblance to what would be experienced in clinical practice. They felt this improved their learning, making them more prepared for the real-life scenario. The monitor was more dynamic, responding to their interventions, helping them maintain focus and engagement throughout. A key theme was the reduction of interruptions or deviations from the scenario to communicate with the examiner or ask for observations. The visual and audible affects provided additional stimuli, adding to the realistic nature of the simulation.DiscussionSimulation has been shown to be a useful education tool, but there is less evidence to support the use of higher fidelity over lower fidelity simulation. The terms are often used inconsistently, and many factors affect the students’ perceived sense of realism. This study shows that the addition of a simple device such as the simulated observations monitor can produce a higher level of fidelity, particularly in terms of the stimuli provided and student perceptions of realism, which may be effective in improving engagement with the simulation, learning, and aid recall when presented with similar scenarios in a real-life situation. |
| published_date |
2024-06-05T05:32:20Z |
| _version_ |
1856805735812300800 |
| score |
11.09611 |

