No Cover Image

Journal article 42 views

Mental health after the COVID-19 pandemic: Policy and public health

Ann John Orcid Logo, Etheldreda Nakimuli-Mpungu, Prof Celso Arango, Prof Rakhi Dandona, Prof Tamsin Ford, Prof Ayana Jordan, Rebecca Cherop, Lola Kola, Prof Carlos López-Jaramillo, Alexandra M Schuster, Kelvin Opiepie, Fabian Musoro, Lawrence A. White, Dmytro Martsenkovskyi, Prof Benedict Daniel Michael, Prof Rory O’Connor, Prof Peter B. Jones

The Lancet Psychiatry

Swansea University Author: Ann John Orcid Logo

  • 70928.AAM.pdf

    PDF | Accepted Manuscript

    Author accepted manuscript document released under the terms of a Creative Commons CC-BY licence using the Swansea University Research Publications Policy (rights retention).

    Download (362.55KB)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed critical weaknesses in mental health systems and intensified existing inequities, highlighting the need for a comprehensive assessment of policy responses and strategies for future resilience. We synthesised evidence from a structured literature search (2020–2024), exp...

Full description

Published in: The Lancet Psychiatry
Published:
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa70928
Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic revealed critical weaknesses in mental health systems and intensified existing inequities, highlighting the need for a comprehensive assessment of policy responses and strategies for future resilience. We synthesised evidence from a structured literature search (2020–2024), expert consultation, and lived-experience contributions, guided by four questions on system adaptations, approaches to inequities, financing strategies, and evidence gaps. Public health systems embedded infodemic management, expanded digital services, and mobilised community workforces, but responses varied in equity and effectiveness. Gender, age, socioeconomic, and racial disparities worsened, though social protection, gender-sensitive policies, school-based services, and culturally adapted interventions showed promise. High-income countries buffered shocks with welfare measures, while low- and middle-income countries faced sharp fiscal constraints. Few studies evaluated cost-effectiveness, or equity impacts of psychosocial interventions. Building resilient, equitable mental health systems require integrated policies spanning communication, digital and community care, gender- and youth-responsive strategies, and sustainable financing, alongside investment in longitudinal and cross-national research
College: Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences