No Cover Image

Journal article 166 views 4 downloads

Balancing flexibility i‐deals and job insecurity: How coordination flexibility i‐deals affect employee well‐being and burnout

Bibi Zhang Orcid Logo, Mariya Mathai Orcid Logo, Jia Li Orcid Logo

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Volume: 98, Issue: 4, Start page: e70072

Swansea University Authors: Bibi Zhang Orcid Logo, Mariya Mathai Orcid Logo, Jia Li Orcid Logo

  • 70988.VOR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The British Psychological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

    Download (909.98KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1111/joop.70072

Abstract

This research introduces coordination flexibility idiosyncratic deals (i-deals), which allow employees to negotiate their current work tasks and pursue alternative job roles and work activities. This research examines when and how coordination flexibility i-deals affect employee well-being and burno...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
ISSN: 0963-1798 2044-8325
Published: Wiley 2025
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa70988
Abstract: This research introduces coordination flexibility idiosyncratic deals (i-deals), which allow employees to negotiate their current work tasks and pursue alternative job roles and work activities. This research examines when and how coordination flexibility i-deals affect employee well-being and burnout. Drawing on social exchange theory and conservation of resources theory, we propose that coordination flexibility i-deals have a more positive effect on well-being and a more negative effect on burnout for employees who have lower job insecurity than those facing higher job insecurity. This is because coordination flexibility i-deals lead employees who have lower (relative to higher) job insecurity to less objectify themselves as if they are instrumental tools. The results of two experimental studies and two multi-wave surveys have provided support for these hypotheses. This research extends the existing literature on flexibility i-deals and adds to our understanding of the boundary conditions and mechanisms through which coordination flexibility i-deals affect well-being and burnout.
Keywords: burnout, flexible working, idiosyncratic deals, job insecurity, self-objectification, well-being
College: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Funders: Swansea University
Issue: 4
Start Page: e70072