Journal article 1 view
UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND STRICT PRODUCT LIABILITY IN THE UK: TIME FOR REFORM
Air and Space Law, Volume: 2026 Volume 1
Swansea University Authors:
Georgios Leloudas , Furkan Bulut
Abstract
Digitalisation and advanced communication technologies are poised to enable the deployment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in non-segregated airspace through Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS), including those that are autonomous. This transition shifts the primary source of accident risk from h...
| Published in: | Air and Space Law |
|---|---|
| Published: |
Kluwer
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa71150 |
| first_indexed |
2025-12-16T11:57:31Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2025-12-17T05:26:33Z |
| id |
cronfa71150 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2025-12-16T11:58:40.5225191</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>71150</id><entry>2025-12-16</entry><title>UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND STRICT PRODUCT LIABILITY IN THE UK: TIME FOR REFORM</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>0e971cacb2ff8d275bc34532b829256c</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-9397-4407</ORCID><firstname>Georgios</firstname><surname>Leloudas</surname><name>Georgios Leloudas</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>7f3dac9919b284dd5902c3d68db67d66</sid><firstname>Furkan</firstname><surname>Bulut</surname><name>Furkan Bulut</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2025-12-16</date><deptcode>HRCL</deptcode><abstract>Digitalisation and advanced communication technologies are poised to enable the deployment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in non-segregated airspace through Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS), including those that are autonomous. This transition shifts the primary source of accident risk from human error to product defect. . As such, it is critical to assess the adequacy of the relevant compensation mechanisms. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 (CPA 1987) is the primary tool that imposes strict liability on producers for defective products in the UK; however, it was drafted before the widespread deployment of interconnected cyber-physical systems and self-learning algorithms. This article evaluates the application of the CPA 1987 to UAS, arguing it is unable to cater for digital technologies, including (but not limited) to defining the “product”, establishing post-supply liability, and addressing the burden of proof for AI applications. Furthermore, it argues that reliance on the operator-focused s 76 (2) – (4) of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 transfers the burden of product defects onto UAS operators. Building upon the new EU Product Liability Directive, this article concludes that the existing product liability framework of the UK is inadequate and requires reform.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Air and Space Law</journal><volume>2026 Volume 1</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Kluwer</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>0</publishedDay><publishedMonth>0</publishedMonth><publishedYear>0</publishedYear><publishedDate>0001-01-01</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HRCL</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-12-16T11:58:40.5225191</lastEdited><Created>2025-12-16T11:25:31.4643818</Created><path><level id="1">Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level><level id="2">LLM Shipping and Trade</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Georgios</firstname><surname>Leloudas</surname><orcid>0000-0002-9397-4407</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Furkan</firstname><surname>Bulut</surname><order>2</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
2025-12-16T11:58:40.5225191 v2 71150 2025-12-16 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND STRICT PRODUCT LIABILITY IN THE UK: TIME FOR REFORM 0e971cacb2ff8d275bc34532b829256c 0000-0002-9397-4407 Georgios Leloudas Georgios Leloudas true false 7f3dac9919b284dd5902c3d68db67d66 Furkan Bulut Furkan Bulut true false 2025-12-16 HRCL Digitalisation and advanced communication technologies are poised to enable the deployment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in non-segregated airspace through Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS), including those that are autonomous. This transition shifts the primary source of accident risk from human error to product defect. . As such, it is critical to assess the adequacy of the relevant compensation mechanisms. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 (CPA 1987) is the primary tool that imposes strict liability on producers for defective products in the UK; however, it was drafted before the widespread deployment of interconnected cyber-physical systems and self-learning algorithms. This article evaluates the application of the CPA 1987 to UAS, arguing it is unable to cater for digital technologies, including (but not limited) to defining the “product”, establishing post-supply liability, and addressing the burden of proof for AI applications. Furthermore, it argues that reliance on the operator-focused s 76 (2) – (4) of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 transfers the burden of product defects onto UAS operators. Building upon the new EU Product Liability Directive, this article concludes that the existing product liability framework of the UK is inadequate and requires reform. Journal Article Air and Space Law 2026 Volume 1 Kluwer 0 0 0 0001-01-01 COLLEGE NANME Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School COLLEGE CODE HRCL Swansea University 2025-12-16T11:58:40.5225191 2025-12-16T11:25:31.4643818 Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law LLM Shipping and Trade Georgios Leloudas 0000-0002-9397-4407 1 Furkan Bulut 2 |
| title |
UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND STRICT PRODUCT LIABILITY IN THE UK: TIME FOR REFORM |
| spellingShingle |
UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND STRICT PRODUCT LIABILITY IN THE UK: TIME FOR REFORM Georgios Leloudas Furkan Bulut |
| title_short |
UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND STRICT PRODUCT LIABILITY IN THE UK: TIME FOR REFORM |
| title_full |
UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND STRICT PRODUCT LIABILITY IN THE UK: TIME FOR REFORM |
| title_fullStr |
UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND STRICT PRODUCT LIABILITY IN THE UK: TIME FOR REFORM |
| title_full_unstemmed |
UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND STRICT PRODUCT LIABILITY IN THE UK: TIME FOR REFORM |
| title_sort |
UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND STRICT PRODUCT LIABILITY IN THE UK: TIME FOR REFORM |
| author_id_str_mv |
0e971cacb2ff8d275bc34532b829256c 7f3dac9919b284dd5902c3d68db67d66 |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
0e971cacb2ff8d275bc34532b829256c_***_Georgios Leloudas 7f3dac9919b284dd5902c3d68db67d66_***_Furkan Bulut |
| author |
Georgios Leloudas Furkan Bulut |
| author2 |
Georgios Leloudas Furkan Bulut |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
Air and Space Law |
| container_volume |
2026 Volume 1 |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| publisher |
Kluwer |
| college_str |
Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
hillaryrodhamclintonschooloflaw |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
hillaryrodhamclintonschooloflaw |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law |
| department_str |
LLM Shipping and Trade{{{_:::_}}}Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}LLM Shipping and Trade |
| document_store_str |
0 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
Digitalisation and advanced communication technologies are poised to enable the deployment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in non-segregated airspace through Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS), including those that are autonomous. This transition shifts the primary source of accident risk from human error to product defect. . As such, it is critical to assess the adequacy of the relevant compensation mechanisms. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 (CPA 1987) is the primary tool that imposes strict liability on producers for defective products in the UK; however, it was drafted before the widespread deployment of interconnected cyber-physical systems and self-learning algorithms. This article evaluates the application of the CPA 1987 to UAS, arguing it is unable to cater for digital technologies, including (but not limited) to defining the “product”, establishing post-supply liability, and addressing the burden of proof for AI applications. Furthermore, it argues that reliance on the operator-focused s 76 (2) – (4) of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 transfers the burden of product defects onto UAS operators. Building upon the new EU Product Liability Directive, this article concludes that the existing product liability framework of the UK is inadequate and requires reform. |
| published_date |
0001-01-01T05:26:33Z |
| _version_ |
1851731941840125952 |
| score |
11.08976 |

