Journal article 52 views
The Internal Perceptions Gap in European Public Administration: Understanding Academic Views of the Discipline
Administrative Theory & Praxis
Swansea University Authors:
Dion Curry , Louis Bromfield
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1080/10841806.2026.2635780
Abstract
We assess the validity of perceived cleavages within Public Administration by examining the tensions between the focus of research and how the discipline is perceived by European academics, drawing on a survey of PA academics in 28 countries and a bibliometric analysis of over 18,500 pieces of acade...
| Published in: | Administrative Theory & Praxis |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1084-1806 1949-0461 |
| Published: |
Informa UK Limited
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa71468 |
| first_indexed |
2026-02-19T14:23:25Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2026-03-11T05:34:54Z |
| id |
cronfa71468 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2026-03-10T12:42:05.7573424</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>71468</id><entry>2026-02-19</entry><title>The Internal Perceptions Gap in European Public Administration: Understanding Academic Views of the Discipline</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>a2d0f6869c6a2478047431f92ea21841</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-2222-5190</ORCID><firstname>Dion</firstname><surname>Curry</surname><name>Dion Curry</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>fbedbcac72958dc4d29f7d4aa4a6a9c0</sid><firstname>Louis</firstname><surname>Bromfield</surname><name>Louis Bromfield</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2026-02-19</date><deptcode>SOSS</deptcode><abstract>We assess the validity of perceived cleavages within Public Administration by examining the tensions between the focus of research and how the discipline is perceived by European academics, drawing on a survey of PA academics in 28 countries and a bibliometric analysis of over 18,500 pieces of academic literature from European sources. We identify tensions in academic expectations about the breadth and depth of research and what is actually being written, along with tensions underlying theoretical versus applied approaches to research. However, healthy debate about methodological approaches to research and general agreement on the outward-looking nature of the discipline show areas of agreement in the discipline. These findings are significant in identifying the state of the PA discipline and can help shape how research is produced and utilised practically and academically, and how the discipline connects beyond the field.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Administrative Theory & Praxis</journal><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Informa UK Limited</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1084-1806</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1949-0461</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>0</publishedDay><publishedMonth>0</publishedMonth><publishedYear>0</publishedYear><publishedDate>0001-01-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/10841806.2026.2635780</doi><url/><notes>In press</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Social Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SOSS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal)</apcterm><funders>EU Seventh Framework Programme</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2026-03-10T12:42:05.7573424</lastEdited><Created>2026-02-19T14:21:11.6549720</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Dion</firstname><surname>Curry</surname><orcid>0000-0003-2222-5190</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Louis</firstname><surname>Bromfield</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Jack</firstname><surname>Tudor</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
2026-03-10T12:42:05.7573424 v2 71468 2026-02-19 The Internal Perceptions Gap in European Public Administration: Understanding Academic Views of the Discipline a2d0f6869c6a2478047431f92ea21841 0000-0003-2222-5190 Dion Curry Dion Curry true false fbedbcac72958dc4d29f7d4aa4a6a9c0 Louis Bromfield Louis Bromfield true false 2026-02-19 SOSS We assess the validity of perceived cleavages within Public Administration by examining the tensions between the focus of research and how the discipline is perceived by European academics, drawing on a survey of PA academics in 28 countries and a bibliometric analysis of over 18,500 pieces of academic literature from European sources. We identify tensions in academic expectations about the breadth and depth of research and what is actually being written, along with tensions underlying theoretical versus applied approaches to research. However, healthy debate about methodological approaches to research and general agreement on the outward-looking nature of the discipline show areas of agreement in the discipline. These findings are significant in identifying the state of the PA discipline and can help shape how research is produced and utilised practically and academically, and how the discipline connects beyond the field. Journal Article Administrative Theory & Praxis Informa UK Limited 1084-1806 1949-0461 0 0 0 0001-01-01 10.1080/10841806.2026.2635780 In press COLLEGE NANME Social Sciences School COLLEGE CODE SOSS Swansea University SU Library paid the OA fee (TA Institutional Deal) EU Seventh Framework Programme 2026-03-10T12:42:05.7573424 2026-02-19T14:21:11.6549720 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Dion Curry 0000-0003-2222-5190 1 Louis Bromfield 2 Jack Tudor 3 |
| title |
The Internal Perceptions Gap in European Public Administration: Understanding Academic Views of the Discipline |
| spellingShingle |
The Internal Perceptions Gap in European Public Administration: Understanding Academic Views of the Discipline Dion Curry Louis Bromfield |
| title_short |
The Internal Perceptions Gap in European Public Administration: Understanding Academic Views of the Discipline |
| title_full |
The Internal Perceptions Gap in European Public Administration: Understanding Academic Views of the Discipline |
| title_fullStr |
The Internal Perceptions Gap in European Public Administration: Understanding Academic Views of the Discipline |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Internal Perceptions Gap in European Public Administration: Understanding Academic Views of the Discipline |
| title_sort |
The Internal Perceptions Gap in European Public Administration: Understanding Academic Views of the Discipline |
| author_id_str_mv |
a2d0f6869c6a2478047431f92ea21841 fbedbcac72958dc4d29f7d4aa4a6a9c0 |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
a2d0f6869c6a2478047431f92ea21841_***_Dion Curry fbedbcac72958dc4d29f7d4aa4a6a9c0_***_Louis Bromfield |
| author |
Dion Curry Louis Bromfield |
| author2 |
Dion Curry Louis Bromfield Jack Tudor |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
Administrative Theory & Praxis |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| issn |
1084-1806 1949-0461 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/10841806.2026.2635780 |
| publisher |
Informa UK Limited |
| college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| department_str |
School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations |
| document_store_str |
0 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
We assess the validity of perceived cleavages within Public Administration by examining the tensions between the focus of research and how the discipline is perceived by European academics, drawing on a survey of PA academics in 28 countries and a bibliometric analysis of over 18,500 pieces of academic literature from European sources. We identify tensions in academic expectations about the breadth and depth of research and what is actually being written, along with tensions underlying theoretical versus applied approaches to research. However, healthy debate about methodological approaches to research and general agreement on the outward-looking nature of the discipline show areas of agreement in the discipline. These findings are significant in identifying the state of the PA discipline and can help shape how research is produced and utilised practically and academically, and how the discipline connects beyond the field. |
| published_date |
0001-01-01T05:34:06Z |
| _version_ |
1859614353093820416 |
| score |
11.099424 |

