Journal article 630 views
Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development
Adalgiso Amendola,
Joshy Easaw,
Antonio Savoia
Public Choice, Volume: 155, Issue: 1-2, Pages: 43 - 60
Swansea University Author: Joshy Easaw
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1007/s11127-011-9838-3
Abstract
This paper studies the distributive impact of institutional change in developing countries. Insuch economies, economic institutions, such as property rights systems, may act to preservethe interests of an influential minority, but this depends crucially on the level of politicalequality. For example...
Published in: | Public Choice |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0048-5829 1573-7101 |
Published: |
2013
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa7896 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2013-07-23T11:59:44Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-02-09T04:36:35Z |
id |
cronfa7896 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2013-11-05T11:40:28.6143390</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>7896</id><entry>2012-02-17</entry><title>Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>4b4b0b76ec82ff557786278e7f172089</sid><firstname>Joshy</firstname><surname>Easaw</surname><name>Joshy Easaw</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-02-17</date><deptcode>BEC</deptcode><abstract>This paper studies the distributive impact of institutional change in developing countries. Insuch economies, economic institutions, such as property rights systems, may act to preservethe interests of an influential minority, but this depends crucially on the level of politicalequality. For example, dominant classes can control key-markets, access to assets andinvestment opportunities, especially if they enjoy disproportionate political power. We testthis hypothesis using cross-section and panel data methods on a sample of low- and middleincomeeconomies from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Results suggest that: (a) increasingthe protection of property rights increases income inequality; (b) such an effect is larger inlow-democracy environments; (c) a minority of countries have developed a set politicalinstitutions capable of counterbalancing this effect.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Public Choice</journal><volume>155</volume><journalNumber>1-2</journalNumber><paginationStart>43</paginationStart><paginationEnd>60</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>0048-5829</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1573-7101</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2013</publishedYear><publishedDate>2013-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1007/s11127-011-9838-3</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Economics</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>BEC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2013-11-05T11:40:28.6143390</lastEdited><Created>2012-02-17T10:23:02.8200000</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Economics</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Adalgiso</firstname><surname>Amendola</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Joshy</firstname><surname>Easaw</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Antonio</firstname><surname>Savoia</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2013-11-05T11:40:28.6143390 v2 7896 2012-02-17 Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development 4b4b0b76ec82ff557786278e7f172089 Joshy Easaw Joshy Easaw true false 2012-02-17 BEC This paper studies the distributive impact of institutional change in developing countries. Insuch economies, economic institutions, such as property rights systems, may act to preservethe interests of an influential minority, but this depends crucially on the level of politicalequality. For example, dominant classes can control key-markets, access to assets andinvestment opportunities, especially if they enjoy disproportionate political power. We testthis hypothesis using cross-section and panel data methods on a sample of low- and middleincomeeconomies from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Results suggest that: (a) increasingthe protection of property rights increases income inequality; (b) such an effect is larger inlow-democracy environments; (c) a minority of countries have developed a set politicalinstitutions capable of counterbalancing this effect. Journal Article Public Choice 155 1-2 43 60 0048-5829 1573-7101 31 12 2013 2013-12-31 10.1007/s11127-011-9838-3 COLLEGE NANME Economics COLLEGE CODE BEC Swansea University 2013-11-05T11:40:28.6143390 2012-02-17T10:23:02.8200000 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Economics Adalgiso Amendola 1 Joshy Easaw 2 Antonio Savoia 3 |
title |
Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development |
spellingShingle |
Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development Joshy Easaw |
title_short |
Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development |
title_full |
Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development |
title_fullStr |
Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development |
title_sort |
Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development |
author_id_str_mv |
4b4b0b76ec82ff557786278e7f172089 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
4b4b0b76ec82ff557786278e7f172089_***_Joshy Easaw |
author |
Joshy Easaw |
author2 |
Adalgiso Amendola Joshy Easaw Antonio Savoia |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Public Choice |
container_volume |
155 |
container_issue |
1-2 |
container_start_page |
43 |
publishDate |
2013 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0048-5829 1573-7101 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11127-011-9838-3 |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Management - Economics{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Economics |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
This paper studies the distributive impact of institutional change in developing countries. Insuch economies, economic institutions, such as property rights systems, may act to preservethe interests of an influential minority, but this depends crucially on the level of politicalequality. For example, dominant classes can control key-markets, access to assets andinvestment opportunities, especially if they enjoy disproportionate political power. We testthis hypothesis using cross-section and panel data methods on a sample of low- and middleincomeeconomies from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Results suggest that: (a) increasingthe protection of property rights increases income inequality; (b) such an effect is larger inlow-democracy environments; (c) a minority of countries have developed a set politicalinstitutions capable of counterbalancing this effect. |
published_date |
2013-12-31T03:09:54Z |
_version_ |
1763749914597130240 |
score |
11.036334 |