Journal article 1114 views 452 downloads
Testing aptitude / Vivienne Rogers; Paul Meara; Rachel Aspinall; Louise Fallon; Thomas Goss; Emily Keey; Rosa Thomas
EUROSLA Yearbook, Volume: 16, Pages: 179 - 210
Swansea University Author: Vivienne, Rogers
PDF | Accepted ManuscriptDownload (5.5MB)
Meara (2005) developed the LLAMA tests as a free, language-neutral, user-friendly suite of aptitude tests incorporating four separate elements: vocabulary learning (LLAMA_B), phonetic (implicit) memory (LLAMA_D), sound-symbol correspondence (LLAMA_E) and grammatical inferencing (LLAMA_F) based on th...
|Published in:||EUROSLA Yearbook|
Check full text
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Meara (2005) developed the LLAMA tests as a free, language-neutral, user-friendly suite of aptitude tests incorporating four separate elements: vocabulary learning (LLAMA_B), phonetic (implicit) memory (LLAMA_D), sound-symbol correspondence (LLAMA_E) and grammatical inferencing (LLAMA_F) based on the standardised MLAT tests (Carroll & Sapon, 1959). Recently, they have become increasingly popular in L2 acquisition research (Grañena & Long, 2013b). However, Meara has expressed concern about the wide use of these tests without validity testing (cf. Grañena 2013a). We investigated several areas relating to the LLAMA tests.1. What is the role of gender in LLAMA test performance?2. Are the LLAMA tests language neutral?3. What is the role of age?4. What is the role of formal education qualifications?5. Does playing logic puzzles affect LLAMA scores?6. What difference would changing the test timings make to scores?229 participants from a range of language backgrounds, aged 10-75 with various education levels, typologically distinct L1s, and varying levels of multilingualism were tested. A subset of participants was also tested with varying timings for the tests. The results showed that the LLAMA tests are gender and language neutral. The younger learners (10-11s) performed significantly worse than the adults in the sound/symbol correspondence task (LLAMA_E). Formal education qualifications show a significant advantage in 3 of the LLAMA subcomponents (B, E, F) but not the implicit measure (LLAMA_D). Playing logic puzzles did not improve LLAMA test scores. The timings appear to be optimal apart from LLAMA_F, which could be shortened.
This article was co-authored with my UG dissertation students who collected the data, which I then re-analysed. Paul Meara contributed a section on the history of the LLAMA tests.
aptitude, second language acquisition
College of Arts and Humanities