No Cover Image

Journal article 683 views 364 downloads

Physical Characteristics Underpinning Repetitive Lunging in Fencing

Anthony N. Turner, Geoff Marshall, James Phillips, Angelo Noto, Conor Buttigieg, Shyam Chavda, William Downing, Nathan Atlay, Lygeri Dimitriou, Laim Kilduff

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Volume: 30, Issue: 11, Pages: 3134 - 3139

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001402

Abstract

Given the repetitive demand to execute lunging and changes in direction within fencing, the ability to sustain these at maximal capacity is fundamental to performance. The aim of this study was threefold. First, to provide normative values for this variable referred to as repeat lunge ability (RLA)...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
ISSN: 1064-8011
Published: 2016
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa30929
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2016-11-04T14:33:40Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T05:17:18Z
id cronfa30929
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2016-12-15T08:36:58Z</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>30929</id><entry>2016-11-04</entry><title>Physical Characteristics Underpinning Repetitive Lunging in Fencing</title><alternativeTitle></alternativeTitle><author>Liam Kilduff</author><firstname>Liam</firstname><surname>Kilduff</surname><active>true</active><ORCID>0000-0001-9449-2293</ORCID><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent><sid>972ed9a1dda7a0de20581a0f8350be98</sid><email>74fe35ffaf3f49dd71ae83b941cc9c75</email><emailaddr>wFF51nm7cK8JlO9bBAhnaQgr5y2nBRz3haj4DmVVDsQ=</emailaddr><date>2016-11-04</date><deptcode>STSC</deptcode><abstract>Given the repetitive demand to execute lunging and changes in direction within fencing, the ability to sustain these at maximal capacity is fundamental to performance. The aim of this study was threefold. First, to provide normative values for this variable referred to as repeat lunge ability (RLA) and second to identify the physical characteristics that underpin it. Third, was to establish if a cause and effect relationship existed by training the associated characteristics. Assessment of lower-body power, reactive strength, speed, change of direction speed (CODS), and a sport-specific RLA were conducted on senior and junior elite male fencers (n = 36). Fencers were on average (&#xB1;SD) 18.9 &#xB1; 3.2 years of age, 174.35 &#xB1; 10.42 cm tall, 70.67 &#xB1; 7.35 kg in mass, and 8.5 &#xB1; 4.2 years fencing experience. The RLA test had average work times of 16.03 &#xB1; 1.40 seconds and demonstrated &#x201C;large&#x201D; to &#x201C;very large&#x201D; associations with all tested variables, but in particular CODS (r = 0.70) and standing broad jump (SBJ; r = &#x2212;0.68). Through linear regression analysis, these also provided a 2-predictor model accounting for 61% of the common variance associated with RLA. A cause and effect relationship with SBJ and CODS was confirmed by the training group, where RLA performance in these fencers improved from 15.80 &#xB1; 1.07 to 14.90 &#xB1; 0.86 seconds, with the magnitude of change reported as &#x201C;moderate&#x201D; (effect size (ES) = 0.93). Concurrent improvements were also noted in both SBJ (216.86 &#xB1; 17.15 vs. 221.71 &#xB1; 17.59 cm) and CODS (4.44 &#xB1; 0.29 vs. 4.31 &#xB1; 0.09 seconds) and while differences were only significant in SBJ, magnitudes of change were classed as &#x201C;small&#x201D; (ES = 0.28) and &#x201C;moderate&#x201D; (ES = 0.61), respectively. In conclusion, to improve RLA strength and conditioning coaches should focus on improving lower-body power and reactive strength, noting that jump training and plyometrics designed to enhance horizontal propulsion may be most effective, and translate to improvement in CODS also.</abstract><type>Journal article</type><journal>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</journal><volume>30</volume><journalNumber>11</journalNumber><paginationStart>3134</paginationStart><paginationEnd>3139</paginationEnd><publisher></publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1064-8011</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords></keywords><publishedDay>0</publishedDay><publishedMonth>11</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2016</publishedYear><publishedDate>2016-11-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000001402</doi><url></url><notes></notes><college>College of Engineering</college><department>Sports Science</department><CollegeCode>CENG</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>STSC</DepartmentCode><institution/><researchGroup>None</researchGroup><supervisor/><sponsorsfunders/><grantnumber/><degreelevel/><degreename>None</degreename><lastEdited>2016-12-15T08:36:58Z</lastEdited><Created>2016-11-04T09:43:02Z</Created><path><level id="1">College of Engineering</level><level id="2">Engineering</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Anthony N.</firstname><surname>Turner</surname><orcid/><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Geoff</firstname><surname>Marshall</surname><orcid/><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>James</firstname><surname>Phillips</surname><orcid/><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Angelo</firstname><surname>Noto</surname><orcid/><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Conor</firstname><surname>Buttigieg</surname><orcid/><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Shyam</firstname><surname>Chavda</surname><orcid/><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>William</firstname><surname>Downing</surname><orcid/><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Nathan</firstname><surname>Atlay</surname><orcid/><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Lygeri</firstname><surname>Dimitriou</surname><orcid/><order>9</order></author><author><firstname>Laim</firstname><surname>Kilduff</surname><orcid/><order>10</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0030929-15122016083327.pdf</filename><originalFilename>turner2016(2).pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2016-12-15T08:33:27Z</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>300424</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>AM</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><action>Published to Cronfa</action><actionDate>15/12/2016</actionDate><embargoDate>2017-11-30T00:00:00</embargoDate><documentNotes/><copyrightCorrect>false</copyrightCorrect><language/></document></documents></rfc1807>
spelling 2016-12-15T08:36:58Z v2 30929 2016-11-04 Physical Characteristics Underpinning Repetitive Lunging in Fencing Liam Kilduff Liam Kilduff true 0000-0001-9449-2293 false 972ed9a1dda7a0de20581a0f8350be98 74fe35ffaf3f49dd71ae83b941cc9c75 wFF51nm7cK8JlO9bBAhnaQgr5y2nBRz3haj4DmVVDsQ= 2016-11-04 STSC Given the repetitive demand to execute lunging and changes in direction within fencing, the ability to sustain these at maximal capacity is fundamental to performance. The aim of this study was threefold. First, to provide normative values for this variable referred to as repeat lunge ability (RLA) and second to identify the physical characteristics that underpin it. Third, was to establish if a cause and effect relationship existed by training the associated characteristics. Assessment of lower-body power, reactive strength, speed, change of direction speed (CODS), and a sport-specific RLA were conducted on senior and junior elite male fencers (n = 36). Fencers were on average (±SD) 18.9 ± 3.2 years of age, 174.35 ± 10.42 cm tall, 70.67 ± 7.35 kg in mass, and 8.5 ± 4.2 years fencing experience. The RLA test had average work times of 16.03 ± 1.40 seconds and demonstrated “large” to “very large” associations with all tested variables, but in particular CODS (r = 0.70) and standing broad jump (SBJ; r = −0.68). Through linear regression analysis, these also provided a 2-predictor model accounting for 61% of the common variance associated with RLA. A cause and effect relationship with SBJ and CODS was confirmed by the training group, where RLA performance in these fencers improved from 15.80 ± 1.07 to 14.90 ± 0.86 seconds, with the magnitude of change reported as “moderate” (effect size (ES) = 0.93). Concurrent improvements were also noted in both SBJ (216.86 ± 17.15 vs. 221.71 ± 17.59 cm) and CODS (4.44 ± 0.29 vs. 4.31 ± 0.09 seconds) and while differences were only significant in SBJ, magnitudes of change were classed as “small” (ES = 0.28) and “moderate” (ES = 0.61), respectively. In conclusion, to improve RLA strength and conditioning coaches should focus on improving lower-body power and reactive strength, noting that jump training and plyometrics designed to enhance horizontal propulsion may be most effective, and translate to improvement in CODS also. Journal article Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 30 11 3134 3139 1064-8011 0 11 2016 2016-11-01 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001402 College of Engineering Sports Science CENG STSC None None 2016-12-15T08:36:58Z 2016-11-04T09:43:02Z College of Engineering Engineering Anthony N. Turner 1 Geoff Marshall 2 James Phillips 3 Angelo Noto 4 Conor Buttigieg 5 Shyam Chavda 6 William Downing 7 Nathan Atlay 8 Lygeri Dimitriou 9 Laim Kilduff 10 0030929-15122016083327.pdf turner2016(2).pdf 2016-12-15T08:33:27Z Output 300424 application/pdf AM true Published to Cronfa 15/12/2016 2017-11-30T00:00:00 false
title Physical Characteristics Underpinning Repetitive Lunging in Fencing
spellingShingle Physical Characteristics Underpinning Repetitive Lunging in Fencing
Kilduff, Liam
title_short Physical Characteristics Underpinning Repetitive Lunging in Fencing
title_full Physical Characteristics Underpinning Repetitive Lunging in Fencing
title_fullStr Physical Characteristics Underpinning Repetitive Lunging in Fencing
title_full_unstemmed Physical Characteristics Underpinning Repetitive Lunging in Fencing
title_sort Physical Characteristics Underpinning Repetitive Lunging in Fencing
author_id_str_mv 972ed9a1dda7a0de20581a0f8350be98
author_id_fullname_str_mv 972ed9a1dda7a0de20581a0f8350be98_***_Kilduff, Liam
author Kilduff, Liam
author2 Anthony N. Turner
Geoff Marshall
James Phillips
Angelo Noto
Conor Buttigieg
Shyam Chavda
William Downing
Nathan Atlay
Lygeri Dimitriou
Laim Kilduff
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
container_volume 30
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3134
publishDate 2016
institution Swansea University
issn 1064-8011
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001402
college_str College of Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id collegeofengineering
hierarchy_top_title College of Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id collegeofengineering
hierarchy_parent_title College of Engineering
department_str Engineering{{{_:::_}}}College of Engineering{{{_:::_}}}Engineering
document_store_str 1
active_str 1
description Given the repetitive demand to execute lunging and changes in direction within fencing, the ability to sustain these at maximal capacity is fundamental to performance. The aim of this study was threefold. First, to provide normative values for this variable referred to as repeat lunge ability (RLA) and second to identify the physical characteristics that underpin it. Third, was to establish if a cause and effect relationship existed by training the associated characteristics. Assessment of lower-body power, reactive strength, speed, change of direction speed (CODS), and a sport-specific RLA were conducted on senior and junior elite male fencers (n = 36). Fencers were on average (±SD) 18.9 ± 3.2 years of age, 174.35 ± 10.42 cm tall, 70.67 ± 7.35 kg in mass, and 8.5 ± 4.2 years fencing experience. The RLA test had average work times of 16.03 ± 1.40 seconds and demonstrated “large” to “very large” associations with all tested variables, but in particular CODS (r = 0.70) and standing broad jump (SBJ; r = −0.68). Through linear regression analysis, these also provided a 2-predictor model accounting for 61% of the common variance associated with RLA. A cause and effect relationship with SBJ and CODS was confirmed by the training group, where RLA performance in these fencers improved from 15.80 ± 1.07 to 14.90 ± 0.86 seconds, with the magnitude of change reported as “moderate” (effect size (ES) = 0.93). Concurrent improvements were also noted in both SBJ (216.86 ± 17.15 vs. 221.71 ± 17.59 cm) and CODS (4.44 ± 0.29 vs. 4.31 ± 0.09 seconds) and while differences were only significant in SBJ, magnitudes of change were classed as “small” (ES = 0.28) and “moderate” (ES = 0.61), respectively. In conclusion, to improve RLA strength and conditioning coaches should focus on improving lower-body power and reactive strength, noting that jump training and plyometrics designed to enhance horizontal propulsion may be most effective, and translate to improvement in CODS also.
published_date 2016-11-01T04:46:10Z
_version_ 1647973048684380160
score 11.035655

Similar Items