Journal article 2211 views 429 downloads
Evidence-Based Higher Education – Is the Learning Styles ‘Myth’ Important?
Philip M. Newton,
Mahallad Miah,
Phil Newton 
Frontiers in Psychology, Volume: 8
Swansea University Author:
Phil Newton
DOI (Published version): 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00444
Abstract
The basic idea behind the use of ‘Learning Styles’ is that learners can be categorized into one or more ‘styles’ (e.g., Visual, Auditory, Converger) and that teaching students according to their style will result in improved learning. This idea has been repeatedly tested and there is currently no ev...
| Published in: | Frontiers in Psychology |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1664-1078 |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa32734 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract: |
The basic idea behind the use of ‘Learning Styles’ is that learners can be categorized into one or more ‘styles’ (e.g., Visual, Auditory, Converger) and that teaching students according to their style will result in improved learning. This idea has been repeatedly tested and there is currently no evidence to support it. Despite this, belief in the use of Learning Styles appears to be widespread amongst schoolteachers and persists in the research literature. This mismatch between evidence and practice has provoked controversy, and some have labeled Learning Styles a ‘myth.’ In this study, we used a survey of academics in UK Higher Education (n = 114) to try and go beyond the controversy by quantifying belief and, crucially, actual use of Learning Styles. We also attempted to understand how academics view the potential harms associated with the use of Learning Styles. We found that general belief in the use of Learning Styles was high (58%), but lower than in similar previous studies, continuing an overall downward trend in recent years. Critically the percentage of respondents who reported actually using Learning Styles (33%) was much lower than those who reported believing in their use. Far more reported using a number of techniques that are demonstrably evidence-based. Academics agreed with all the posited weaknesses and harms of Learning Styles theory, agreeing most strongly that the basic theory of Learning Styles is conceptually flawed. However, a substantial number of participants (32%) stated that they would continue to use Learning Styles despite being presented with the lack of an evidence base to support them, suggesting that ‘debunking’ Learning Styles may not be effective. We argue that the interests of all may be better served by promoting evidence-based approaches to Higher Education. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
Learning Styles, Higher Education, Evidence-based education, VARK, Kolb, neuromyth |
| College: |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |