No Cover Image

Journal article 981 views 160 downloads

The Learning Styles Neuromyth Is Still Thriving in Medical Education

Phil Newton Orcid Logo, Hannah Farukh Najabat-Lattif, Gabriella Santiago, Artharva Salvi

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Volume: 15

Swansea University Authors: Phil Newton Orcid Logo, Gabriella Santiago, Artharva Salvi

  • 57501.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    Copyright © 2021 Newton, Najabat-Lattif, Santiago and Salvi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)

    Download (202.28KB)

Abstract

Learning Styles theory promises improved academic performance based on the identification of a personal, sensory preference for informational processing. This promise is not supported by evidence, and is in contrast to our current understanding of the neuroscience of learning. Despite this lack of e...

Full description

Published in: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2021
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa57501
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: Learning Styles theory promises improved academic performance based on the identification of a personal, sensory preference for informational processing. This promise is not supported by evidence, and is in contrast to our current understanding of the neuroscience of learning. Despite this lack of evidence, prior research shows that that belief in the Learning Styles “neuromyth” remains high amongst educators of all levels, around the world. This perspective article is a follow up on prior research aimed at understanding why belief in the neuromyth of Learning Styles remains so high. We evaluated current research papers from the field of health professions education, to characterize the perspective that an educator would be given, should they search for evidence on Learning Styles. As in earlier research on Higher Education, we found that the use of Learning Style frameworks persist in education research for the health professions; 91% of 112 recent research papers published on Learning Styles are based upon the premise that Learning Styles are a useful approach to education. This is in sharp contrast to the fundamental principle of evidence-based practice within these professions. Thus any educator who sought out the research evidence on Learning Styles would be given a consistent but inaccurate endorsement of the value of a teaching technique that is not evidence based, possibly then propagating the belief in Learning Styles. Here we offer perspectives from both research and student about this apparent mismatch between educational practice and clinical practice, along with recommendations and considerations for the future.
Keywords: evidence based education, neuromyth, VARK learning style, Kolb, medical education
College: Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences