No Cover Image

Journal article 1566 views 529 downloads

Altering Pace Control and Pace Regulation: Attentional Focus Effects During Running

NOEL E. BRICK, MARK J. CAMPBELL, Richard Metcalfe Orcid Logo, JACQUELINE L. MAIR, TADHG E. MACINTYRE

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Volume: 48, Issue: 5, Pages: 879 - 886

Swansea University Author: Richard Metcalfe Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000843

Abstract

Purpose: To date, there are no published studies directly comparing self-controlled (SC) and externally controlled (EC) pace endurance tasks. However, previous research suggests pace control may impact on cognitive strategy use and effort perceptions. The primary aim of this study was to investigate...

Full description

Published in: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
ISSN: 0195-9131
Published: 2016
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa35657
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: Purpose: To date, there are no published studies directly comparing self-controlled (SC) and externally controlled (EC) pace endurance tasks. However, previous research suggests pace control may impact on cognitive strategy use and effort perceptions. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of manipulating perception of pace control on attentional focus, physiological, and psychological outcomes during running. The secondary aim was to determine the reproducibility of self-paced running performance when regulated by effort perceptions.Methods: Twenty experienced endurance runners completed four 3-km time trials on a treadmill. Subjects completed two SC pace trials, one perceived exertion clamped (PE) trial, and one EC pace time trial. PE and EC were completed in a counterbalanced order. Pacing strategy for EC and perceived exertion instructions for PE replicated the subjects’ fastest SC time trial.Results: Subjects reported a greater focus on cognitive strategies such as relaxing and optimizing running action during EC than during SC. The mean HR was 2% lower during EC than that during SC despite an identical pacing strategy. Perceived exertion did not differ between the three conditions. However, increased internal sensory monitoring coincided with elevated effort perceptions in some subjects during EC and a 10% slower completion time for PE (13.0 ± 1.6 min) than that for SC (11.8 ± 1.2 min).Conclusions: Altering pace control and pace regulation impacted on attentional focus. External control over pacing may facilitate performance, particularly when runners engage attentional strategies conducive to improved running efficiency. However, regulating pace based on effort perceptions alone may result in excessive monitoring of bodily sensations and a slower running speed. Accordingly, attentional focus interventions may prove beneficial for some athletes to adopt task-appropriate attentional strategies to optimize performance.
Keywords: ATTENTIONAL STRATEGIES, PERCEIVED EXERTION, PACING, METACOGNITION, ENDURANCE
Issue: 5
Start Page: 879
End Page: 886

Similar Items