No Cover Image

ResearchReportExternalBody 412 views 110 downloads

Age Friendly Transport for Greater Manchester / Charles, Musselwhite

Swansea University Author: Charles, Musselwhite

Abstract

Background and MethodologyMobility and travel is important to older people, reduced mobility is linked to poorer mental and physical health for a variety of reasons. There is a decline in driving in later life and walking and using public buses are common modes of transport for older people througho...

Full description

Published: Swansea, UK. 2018
Online Access: https://www.drcharliemuss.com/uploads/1/2/8/0/12809985/gt_manchester_age_friendly_transport_report_040918.pdf
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa44821
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2018-10-09T19:37:34Z
last_indexed 2018-11-27T14:18:58Z
id cronfa44821
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2018-11-27T10:55:33.1366092</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>44821</id><entry>2018-10-09</entry><title>Age Friendly Transport for Greater Manchester</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>c9a49f25a5adb54c55612ae49560100c</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-4831-2092</ORCID><firstname>Charles</firstname><surname>Musselwhite</surname><name>Charles Musselwhite</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2018-10-09</date><deptcode>HIA</deptcode><abstract>Background and MethodologyMobility and travel is important to older people, reduced mobility is linked to poorer mental and physical health for a variety of reasons. There is a decline in driving in later life and walking and using public buses are common modes of transport for older people throughout the Greater Manchester (GM) area. GM has a higher than average amount of deprivation and healthy life expectancy is lower than the English average. Keeping people active and mobile from a younger age, especially through walking, cycling or using the bus, can reduce the impact of this inequality in later life. Workshops were set up in six different locations in GM (Tameside, Bolton, Bury, Oldham, Wigan, Salford) with older people and advocates. Each workshop got participants to identify and prioritise key issues they have with transport and mobility, followed by discussions on solutions to these issues. Issues with transport identified Walking1.Poor quality pavements. &#x2013; poor upkeep and maintenance were noted with a risk of falls.2.Obstructions on pavements &#x2013; including parked cars, cyclists and mobility scooters.3.Pedestrian crossings &#x2013; length of time given to cross was seen as too short and crossings often placed in wrong place with a lack of dropped kerbs and issues with blistered paving.4.Speeding traffic near to pedestrian area &#x2013; making it unpleasant, dangerous and difficult to cross 5.Lack of benches and toilets6.Poor street lighting (especially an issue in Wigan)7.Pollution (especially an issue in Wigan)Cycling It would help cyclists and also pedestrian and drivers if dedicated cycle paths were built.Public Buses1.Bus driver awareness of older people&#x2019;s issues &#x2013; especially drivers driving off before the person had sat down, not being sympathetic to older people struggling with their pass or with bags and not stopping close enough to the kerb for people to easily board and alight. 2.Poor bus service - including the bus stop being poorly cited not close to residential areas (esp Wigan and Oldham) or the bottom of hills (esp Wigan) and unreliability of service (esp. Oldham) and difficulty swapping between buses with different operators (all areas). 3.Poor bus stops &#x2013; poor signage and information (esp. Oldham and Bolton) and lack of seating.4.Poor quality buses &#x2013; Drop down mechanisms that fail and lack of grab rails on the bus.5.Extending free bus pass to before 9:30am - especially for hospital and doctor appointments.Community transport and ring and ride services There was some ambiguity over who was eligible to use community transport. Some people even discussed not knowing community transport existed at all. Second, some felt the service was too inconvenient and unreliable, taking too long to travel to places. Railway serviceHighest priority area was lack of help, tickets being confusing and not getting a seat. More minor priorities were accessibility at railway stations and cleanliness of trains. Driving Difficulty getting a blue disabled badge if needed on a temporary basis was noted. Lack of drop off points near health centres and bus stops was also discussed. Finally cars parked on the road and on pavements can be an issue to drivers. PolicyNot being involved in decisions affecting transport was frequently noted. Coupled with this was feeding back, including lack of confidence in reporting and time taken to make any changes. Underinvestment in areas outside of London was a very common and very important issue. SolutionsThe participants ranked the solutions around priority and how long it would take to implement. Priority areas are those that older people felt need to be done first and would have highest effect included: training for frontline public transport staff, concessionary bus pass to operate before 9:30, developing Transport Action Group, implementing a community toilet scheme and take a seat campaign and having audio-visual bus stops. There were then two groups where a strategy would be needed in order to reach the goal and where a slightly longer term plan would be required, these included auditing local areas, reforming local bus services, general pavement improvements, bus buddy scheme, Independent Transport Networks and low emission plans. Information sharing website.Recommendations Recommendations based on these were developed in five key areas&#x2022;Recommendation 1: Staff working in transport to be trained in older people&#x2019;s issues&#x2022;Recommendation 2: Getting more older people involved in transport planning and design&#x2022;Recommendation 3: That other sectors help manage transport demand better&#x2022;Recommendation 4: Community resources and support&#x2022;Recommendation 5: Demonstrator communities</abstract><type>ResearchReportExternalBody</type><journal/><publisher/><placeOfPublication>Swansea, UK.</placeOfPublication><keywords>transport, mobility, ageing, gerontology, older people, manchester, buses, community transport, cycling, walking, rail</keywords><publishedDay>4</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2018</publishedYear><publishedDate>2018-09-04</publishedDate><doi/><url>https://www.drcharliemuss.com/uploads/1/2/8/0/12809985/gt_manchester_age_friendly_transport_report_040918.pdf</url><notes>Report for Transport for Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester Ageing Hub at Greater Manchester Combined Authority and Centre for Ageing Better with support from Ambition for Ageing at GMCVO</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Centre for Innovative Ageing</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HIA</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><lastEdited>2018-11-27T10:55:33.1366092</lastEdited><Created>2018-10-09T16:14:09.2529716</Created><path><level id="1">College of Human and Health Sciences</level><level id="2">Centre for Innovative Ageing</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Charles</firstname><surname>Musselwhite</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4831-2092</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0044821-09102018161445.pdf</filename><originalFilename>GtManchesterAgeFriendlyTransportReport040918.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2018-10-09T16:14:45.0200000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>3878830</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><action/><embargoDate>2018-10-09T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents></rfc1807>
spelling 2018-11-27T10:55:33.1366092 v2 44821 2018-10-09 Age Friendly Transport for Greater Manchester c9a49f25a5adb54c55612ae49560100c 0000-0002-4831-2092 Charles Musselwhite Charles Musselwhite true false 2018-10-09 HIA Background and MethodologyMobility and travel is important to older people, reduced mobility is linked to poorer mental and physical health for a variety of reasons. There is a decline in driving in later life and walking and using public buses are common modes of transport for older people throughout the Greater Manchester (GM) area. GM has a higher than average amount of deprivation and healthy life expectancy is lower than the English average. Keeping people active and mobile from a younger age, especially through walking, cycling or using the bus, can reduce the impact of this inequality in later life. Workshops were set up in six different locations in GM (Tameside, Bolton, Bury, Oldham, Wigan, Salford) with older people and advocates. Each workshop got participants to identify and prioritise key issues they have with transport and mobility, followed by discussions on solutions to these issues. Issues with transport identified Walking1.Poor quality pavements. – poor upkeep and maintenance were noted with a risk of falls.2.Obstructions on pavements – including parked cars, cyclists and mobility scooters.3.Pedestrian crossings – length of time given to cross was seen as too short and crossings often placed in wrong place with a lack of dropped kerbs and issues with blistered paving.4.Speeding traffic near to pedestrian area – making it unpleasant, dangerous and difficult to cross 5.Lack of benches and toilets6.Poor street lighting (especially an issue in Wigan)7.Pollution (especially an issue in Wigan)Cycling It would help cyclists and also pedestrian and drivers if dedicated cycle paths were built.Public Buses1.Bus driver awareness of older people’s issues – especially drivers driving off before the person had sat down, not being sympathetic to older people struggling with their pass or with bags and not stopping close enough to the kerb for people to easily board and alight. 2.Poor bus service - including the bus stop being poorly cited not close to residential areas (esp Wigan and Oldham) or the bottom of hills (esp Wigan) and unreliability of service (esp. Oldham) and difficulty swapping between buses with different operators (all areas). 3.Poor bus stops – poor signage and information (esp. Oldham and Bolton) and lack of seating.4.Poor quality buses – Drop down mechanisms that fail and lack of grab rails on the bus.5.Extending free bus pass to before 9:30am - especially for hospital and doctor appointments.Community transport and ring and ride services There was some ambiguity over who was eligible to use community transport. Some people even discussed not knowing community transport existed at all. Second, some felt the service was too inconvenient and unreliable, taking too long to travel to places. Railway serviceHighest priority area was lack of help, tickets being confusing and not getting a seat. More minor priorities were accessibility at railway stations and cleanliness of trains. Driving Difficulty getting a blue disabled badge if needed on a temporary basis was noted. Lack of drop off points near health centres and bus stops was also discussed. Finally cars parked on the road and on pavements can be an issue to drivers. PolicyNot being involved in decisions affecting transport was frequently noted. Coupled with this was feeding back, including lack of confidence in reporting and time taken to make any changes. Underinvestment in areas outside of London was a very common and very important issue. SolutionsThe participants ranked the solutions around priority and how long it would take to implement. Priority areas are those that older people felt need to be done first and would have highest effect included: training for frontline public transport staff, concessionary bus pass to operate before 9:30, developing Transport Action Group, implementing a community toilet scheme and take a seat campaign and having audio-visual bus stops. There were then two groups where a strategy would be needed in order to reach the goal and where a slightly longer term plan would be required, these included auditing local areas, reforming local bus services, general pavement improvements, bus buddy scheme, Independent Transport Networks and low emission plans. Information sharing website.Recommendations Recommendations based on these were developed in five key areas•Recommendation 1: Staff working in transport to be trained in older people’s issues•Recommendation 2: Getting more older people involved in transport planning and design•Recommendation 3: That other sectors help manage transport demand better•Recommendation 4: Community resources and support•Recommendation 5: Demonstrator communities ResearchReportExternalBody Swansea, UK. transport, mobility, ageing, gerontology, older people, manchester, buses, community transport, cycling, walking, rail 4 9 2018 2018-09-04 https://www.drcharliemuss.com/uploads/1/2/8/0/12809985/gt_manchester_age_friendly_transport_report_040918.pdf Report for Transport for Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester Ageing Hub at Greater Manchester Combined Authority and Centre for Ageing Better with support from Ambition for Ageing at GMCVO COLLEGE NANME Centre for Innovative Ageing COLLEGE CODE HIA Swansea University 2018-11-27T10:55:33.1366092 2018-10-09T16:14:09.2529716 College of Human and Health Sciences Centre for Innovative Ageing Charles Musselwhite 0000-0002-4831-2092 1 0044821-09102018161445.pdf GtManchesterAgeFriendlyTransportReport040918.pdf 2018-10-09T16:14:45.0200000 Output 3878830 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2018-10-09T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Age Friendly Transport for Greater Manchester
spellingShingle Age Friendly Transport for Greater Manchester
Charles, Musselwhite
title_short Age Friendly Transport for Greater Manchester
title_full Age Friendly Transport for Greater Manchester
title_fullStr Age Friendly Transport for Greater Manchester
title_full_unstemmed Age Friendly Transport for Greater Manchester
title_sort Age Friendly Transport for Greater Manchester
author_id_str_mv c9a49f25a5adb54c55612ae49560100c
author_id_fullname_str_mv c9a49f25a5adb54c55612ae49560100c_***_Charles, Musselwhite
author Charles, Musselwhite
format ResearchReportExternalBody
publishDate 2018
institution Swansea University
college_str College of Human and Health Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id collegeofhumanandhealthsciences
hierarchy_top_title College of Human and Health Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id collegeofhumanandhealthsciences
hierarchy_parent_title College of Human and Health Sciences
department_str Centre for Innovative Ageing{{{_:::_}}}College of Human and Health Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Centre for Innovative Ageing
url https://www.drcharliemuss.com/uploads/1/2/8/0/12809985/gt_manchester_age_friendly_transport_report_040918.pdf
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Background and MethodologyMobility and travel is important to older people, reduced mobility is linked to poorer mental and physical health for a variety of reasons. There is a decline in driving in later life and walking and using public buses are common modes of transport for older people throughout the Greater Manchester (GM) area. GM has a higher than average amount of deprivation and healthy life expectancy is lower than the English average. Keeping people active and mobile from a younger age, especially through walking, cycling or using the bus, can reduce the impact of this inequality in later life. Workshops were set up in six different locations in GM (Tameside, Bolton, Bury, Oldham, Wigan, Salford) with older people and advocates. Each workshop got participants to identify and prioritise key issues they have with transport and mobility, followed by discussions on solutions to these issues. Issues with transport identified Walking1.Poor quality pavements. – poor upkeep and maintenance were noted with a risk of falls.2.Obstructions on pavements – including parked cars, cyclists and mobility scooters.3.Pedestrian crossings – length of time given to cross was seen as too short and crossings often placed in wrong place with a lack of dropped kerbs and issues with blistered paving.4.Speeding traffic near to pedestrian area – making it unpleasant, dangerous and difficult to cross 5.Lack of benches and toilets6.Poor street lighting (especially an issue in Wigan)7.Pollution (especially an issue in Wigan)Cycling It would help cyclists and also pedestrian and drivers if dedicated cycle paths were built.Public Buses1.Bus driver awareness of older people’s issues – especially drivers driving off before the person had sat down, not being sympathetic to older people struggling with their pass or with bags and not stopping close enough to the kerb for people to easily board and alight. 2.Poor bus service - including the bus stop being poorly cited not close to residential areas (esp Wigan and Oldham) or the bottom of hills (esp Wigan) and unreliability of service (esp. Oldham) and difficulty swapping between buses with different operators (all areas). 3.Poor bus stops – poor signage and information (esp. Oldham and Bolton) and lack of seating.4.Poor quality buses – Drop down mechanisms that fail and lack of grab rails on the bus.5.Extending free bus pass to before 9:30am - especially for hospital and doctor appointments.Community transport and ring and ride services There was some ambiguity over who was eligible to use community transport. Some people even discussed not knowing community transport existed at all. Second, some felt the service was too inconvenient and unreliable, taking too long to travel to places. Railway serviceHighest priority area was lack of help, tickets being confusing and not getting a seat. More minor priorities were accessibility at railway stations and cleanliness of trains. Driving Difficulty getting a blue disabled badge if needed on a temporary basis was noted. Lack of drop off points near health centres and bus stops was also discussed. Finally cars parked on the road and on pavements can be an issue to drivers. PolicyNot being involved in decisions affecting transport was frequently noted. Coupled with this was feeding back, including lack of confidence in reporting and time taken to make any changes. Underinvestment in areas outside of London was a very common and very important issue. SolutionsThe participants ranked the solutions around priority and how long it would take to implement. Priority areas are those that older people felt need to be done first and would have highest effect included: training for frontline public transport staff, concessionary bus pass to operate before 9:30, developing Transport Action Group, implementing a community toilet scheme and take a seat campaign and having audio-visual bus stops. There were then two groups where a strategy would be needed in order to reach the goal and where a slightly longer term plan would be required, these included auditing local areas, reforming local bus services, general pavement improvements, bus buddy scheme, Independent Transport Networks and low emission plans. Information sharing website.Recommendations Recommendations based on these were developed in five key areas•Recommendation 1: Staff working in transport to be trained in older people’s issues•Recommendation 2: Getting more older people involved in transport planning and design•Recommendation 3: That other sectors help manage transport demand better•Recommendation 4: Community resources and support•Recommendation 5: Demonstrator communities
published_date 2018-09-04T20:08:03Z
_version_ 1672220438844932096
score 10.736252