Journal article 521 views
Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires
Matthias Augustin,
Katrin Baade,
Kristina Heyer,
Patricia E Price,
Katharina Herberger,
Thomas Wild,
Michael Engelhardt,
Eike S Debus,
Tricia Price
International Wound Journal, Volume: 14, Issue: 6, Pages: 1299 - 1304
Swansea University Author: Tricia Price
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1111/iwj.12803
Abstract
The study directly compared the feasibility and performance of three instruments measuring health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in chronic ulcers: the Freiburg Life Quality Assessment for wounds (FLQA‐w), the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS) and the Würzburg Wound Score (WWS). The questionnair...
| Published in: | International Wound Journal |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 17424801 |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa48714 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| first_indexed |
2019-02-05T20:03:13Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2019-07-18T21:30:16Z |
| id |
cronfa48714 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>48714</id><entry>2019-02-05</entry><title>Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>72b4943af96c97ef72977c31b9c29624</sid><firstname>Tricia</firstname><surname>Price</surname><name>Tricia Price</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-02-05</date><deptcode>FGMHL</deptcode><abstract>The study directly compared the feasibility and performance of three instruments measuring health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in chronic ulcers: the Freiburg Life Quality Assessment for wounds (FLQA‐w), the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS) and the Würzburg Wound Score (WWS). The questionnaires were evaluated in a randomly assigned order in a longitudinal observational study of leg ulcer patients. Psychometric properties (internal consistency, responsiveness and construct validity) were analysed. Patient acceptance was recorded. Analysis of n = 154 patients revealed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0·85) for all instruments. There were minor floor effects in all questionnaires (<1%) and some ceiling effects in the CWIS. Construct validity was satisfactory, for example, correlation with EuroQoL‐5D was r = 0·70 in the FLQA‐w, r = 0·47/0·67/0·68 in the CWIS dimensions and r = 0·60 in the WWS. The proportion of missing values was higher in the CWIS, and overall patient acceptance was highest in the FLQA‐w for wounds (54% best preferences) and lowest in the WWS (14%). In conclusion, the FLQA‐w, the CWIS and the WWS are reliable, sensitive and valid instruments for the assessment of HRQoL in leg ulcers. However, they show differences in clinical feasibility and patient acceptance.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>International Wound Journal</journal><volume>14</volume><journalNumber>6</journalNumber><paginationStart>1299</paginationStart><paginationEnd>1304</paginationEnd><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>17424801</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>6</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2017</publishedYear><publishedDate>2017-12-06</publishedDate><doi>10.1111/iwj.12803</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Medicine, Health and Life Science - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGMHL</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-06-28T15:27:20.7095044</lastEdited><Created>2019-02-05T16:57:16.2513994</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">Swansea University Medical School - Medicine</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Matthias</firstname><surname>Augustin</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Katrin</firstname><surname>Baade</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Kristina</firstname><surname>Heyer</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Patricia E</firstname><surname>Price</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Katharina</firstname><surname>Herberger</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Thomas</firstname><surname>Wild</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Michael</firstname><surname>Engelhardt</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Eike S</firstname><surname>Debus</surname><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Tricia</firstname><surname>Price</surname><order>9</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
v2 48714 2019-02-05 Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires 72b4943af96c97ef72977c31b9c29624 Tricia Price Tricia Price true false 2019-02-05 FGMHL The study directly compared the feasibility and performance of three instruments measuring health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in chronic ulcers: the Freiburg Life Quality Assessment for wounds (FLQA‐w), the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS) and the Würzburg Wound Score (WWS). The questionnaires were evaluated in a randomly assigned order in a longitudinal observational study of leg ulcer patients. Psychometric properties (internal consistency, responsiveness and construct validity) were analysed. Patient acceptance was recorded. Analysis of n = 154 patients revealed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0·85) for all instruments. There were minor floor effects in all questionnaires (<1%) and some ceiling effects in the CWIS. Construct validity was satisfactory, for example, correlation with EuroQoL‐5D was r = 0·70 in the FLQA‐w, r = 0·47/0·67/0·68 in the CWIS dimensions and r = 0·60 in the WWS. The proportion of missing values was higher in the CWIS, and overall patient acceptance was highest in the FLQA‐w for wounds (54% best preferences) and lowest in the WWS (14%). In conclusion, the FLQA‐w, the CWIS and the WWS are reliable, sensitive and valid instruments for the assessment of HRQoL in leg ulcers. However, they show differences in clinical feasibility and patient acceptance. Journal Article International Wound Journal 14 6 1299 1304 17424801 6 12 2017 2017-12-06 10.1111/iwj.12803 COLLEGE NANME Medicine, Health and Life Science - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGMHL Swansea University 2023-06-28T15:27:20.7095044 2019-02-05T16:57:16.2513994 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Swansea University Medical School - Medicine Matthias Augustin 1 Katrin Baade 2 Kristina Heyer 3 Patricia E Price 4 Katharina Herberger 5 Thomas Wild 6 Michael Engelhardt 7 Eike S Debus 8 Tricia Price 9 |
| title |
Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires |
| spellingShingle |
Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires Tricia Price |
| title_short |
Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires |
| title_full |
Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires |
| title_fullStr |
Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires |
| title_sort |
Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires |
| author_id_str_mv |
72b4943af96c97ef72977c31b9c29624 |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
72b4943af96c97ef72977c31b9c29624_***_Tricia Price |
| author |
Tricia Price |
| author2 |
Matthias Augustin Katrin Baade Kristina Heyer Patricia E Price Katharina Herberger Thomas Wild Michael Engelhardt Eike S Debus Tricia Price |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
International Wound Journal |
| container_volume |
14 |
| container_issue |
6 |
| container_start_page |
1299 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| issn |
17424801 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/iwj.12803 |
| college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| department_str |
Swansea University Medical School - Medicine{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Swansea University Medical School - Medicine |
| document_store_str |
0 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
The study directly compared the feasibility and performance of three instruments measuring health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in chronic ulcers: the Freiburg Life Quality Assessment for wounds (FLQA‐w), the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS) and the Würzburg Wound Score (WWS). The questionnaires were evaluated in a randomly assigned order in a longitudinal observational study of leg ulcer patients. Psychometric properties (internal consistency, responsiveness and construct validity) were analysed. Patient acceptance was recorded. Analysis of n = 154 patients revealed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0·85) for all instruments. There were minor floor effects in all questionnaires (<1%) and some ceiling effects in the CWIS. Construct validity was satisfactory, for example, correlation with EuroQoL‐5D was r = 0·70 in the FLQA‐w, r = 0·47/0·67/0·68 in the CWIS dimensions and r = 0·60 in the WWS. The proportion of missing values was higher in the CWIS, and overall patient acceptance was highest in the FLQA‐w for wounds (54% best preferences) and lowest in the WWS (14%). In conclusion, the FLQA‐w, the CWIS and the WWS are reliable, sensitive and valid instruments for the assessment of HRQoL in leg ulcers. However, they show differences in clinical feasibility and patient acceptance. |
| published_date |
2017-12-06T15:27:17Z |
| _version_ |
1769956900900700160 |
| score |
11.036334 |