No Cover Image

Journal article 205 views 3 downloads

Brain-Injured Footballers, Voluntary Choice and Social Goods. A Reply to Corlett / Francisco Javier Lopez Frias; Michael McNamee

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, Pages: 1 - 10

Swansea University Author: Michael, McNamee

Abstract

In this essay, we respond to Angelo Corlett’s criticism of our paper ‘Ethics, Brain Injuries, and Sports: Prohibition, Reform, and Prudence’. To do so, first, we revisit certain assumptions and arguments Corlett makes concerning intercollegiate football and brain injuries in his 2014 paper ‘Should i...

Full description

Published in: Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
ISSN: 1751-1321 1751-133X
Published: 2019
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa49149
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: In this essay, we respond to Angelo Corlett’s criticism of our paper ‘Ethics, Brain Injuries, and Sports: Prohibition, Reform, and Prudence’. To do so, first, we revisit certain assumptions and arguments Corlett makes concerning intercollegiate football and brain injuries in his 2014 paper ‘Should intercollegiate football be eliminated?’. Second, we identify and criticize two key elements in his response regarding (a) ‘luck egalitarianism’, and (b) ‘public goods’. We conclude by reaffirming our critical reading of Corlett’s original 2014 paper and by identifying further elements (i) luck and the nature of individual responsibility; and (ii) the nature of sports as public rather than merely private goods, that he would have to address for his latter 2018 position to hold true.
Keywords: Concussions, ethics, responsibility, public goods, football
College: College of Engineering
Start Page: 1
End Page: 10