No Cover Image

Journal article 783 views 126 downloads

Brain-Injured Footballers, Voluntary Choice and Social Goods. A Reply to Corlett

Francisco Javier Lopez Frias, Michael McNamee Orcid Logo

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, Pages: 1 - 10

Swansea University Author: Michael McNamee Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1080/17511321.2019.1583273

Abstract

In this essay, we respond to Angelo Corlett’s criticism of our paper ‘Ethics, Brain Injuries, and Sports: Prohibition, Reform, and Prudence’. To do so, first, we revisit certain assumptions and arguments Corlett makes concerning intercollegiate football and brain injuries in his 2014 paper ‘Should i...

Full description

Published in: Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
ISSN: 1751-1321 1751-133X
Published: 2019
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa49149
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2019-03-08T14:03:39Z
last_indexed 2023-01-11T14:25:04Z
id cronfa49149
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-10-19T15:29:09.5301565</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>49149</id><entry>2019-03-08</entry><title>Brain-Injured Footballers, Voluntary Choice and Social Goods. A Reply to Corlett</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>85b0b1623e55d977378622a6aab7ee6e</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-5857-909X</ORCID><firstname>Michael</firstname><surname>McNamee</surname><name>Michael McNamee</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-03-08</date><deptcode>STSC</deptcode><abstract>In this essay, we respond to Angelo Corlett&#x2019;s criticism of our paper &#x2018;Ethics, Brain Injuries, and Sports: Prohibition, Reform, and Prudence&#x2019;. To do so, first, we revisit certain assumptions and arguments Corlett makes concerning intercollegiate football and brain injuries in his 2014 paper &#x2018;Should intercollegiate football be eliminated?&#x2019;. Second, we identify and criticize two key elements in his response regarding (a) &#x2018;luck egalitarianism&#x2019;, and (b) &#x2018;public goods&#x2019;. We conclude by reaffirming our critical reading of Corlett&#x2019;s original 2014 paper and by identifying further elements (i) luck and the nature of individual responsibility; and (ii) the nature of sports as public rather than merely private goods, that he would have to address for his latter 2018 position to hold true.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Sport, Ethics and Philosophy</journal><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart>1</paginationStart><paginationEnd>10</paginationEnd><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1751-1321</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1751-133X</issnElectronic><keywords>Concussions, ethics, responsibility, public goods, football</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2019</publishedYear><publishedDate>2019-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/17511321.2019.1583273</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Sport and Exercise Sciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>STSC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-10-19T15:29:09.5301565</lastEdited><Created>2019-03-08T09:05:17.0947006</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Francisco Javier Lopez</firstname><surname>Frias</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Michael</firstname><surname>McNamee</surname><orcid>0000-0002-5857-909X</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0049149-08032019092821.pdf</filename><originalFilename>lopezfrias2019.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2019-03-08T09:28:21.3330000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>380646</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2020-09-07T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-10-19T15:29:09.5301565 v2 49149 2019-03-08 Brain-Injured Footballers, Voluntary Choice and Social Goods. A Reply to Corlett 85b0b1623e55d977378622a6aab7ee6e 0000-0002-5857-909X Michael McNamee Michael McNamee true false 2019-03-08 STSC In this essay, we respond to Angelo Corlett’s criticism of our paper ‘Ethics, Brain Injuries, and Sports: Prohibition, Reform, and Prudence’. To do so, first, we revisit certain assumptions and arguments Corlett makes concerning intercollegiate football and brain injuries in his 2014 paper ‘Should intercollegiate football be eliminated?’. Second, we identify and criticize two key elements in his response regarding (a) ‘luck egalitarianism’, and (b) ‘public goods’. We conclude by reaffirming our critical reading of Corlett’s original 2014 paper and by identifying further elements (i) luck and the nature of individual responsibility; and (ii) the nature of sports as public rather than merely private goods, that he would have to address for his latter 2018 position to hold true. Journal Article Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 10 1751-1321 1751-133X Concussions, ethics, responsibility, public goods, football 31 12 2019 2019-12-31 10.1080/17511321.2019.1583273 COLLEGE NANME Sport and Exercise Sciences COLLEGE CODE STSC Swansea University 2022-10-19T15:29:09.5301565 2019-03-08T09:05:17.0947006 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences Francisco Javier Lopez Frias 1 Michael McNamee 0000-0002-5857-909X 2 0049149-08032019092821.pdf lopezfrias2019.pdf 2019-03-08T09:28:21.3330000 Output 380646 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2020-09-07T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Brain-Injured Footballers, Voluntary Choice and Social Goods. A Reply to Corlett
spellingShingle Brain-Injured Footballers, Voluntary Choice and Social Goods. A Reply to Corlett
Michael McNamee
title_short Brain-Injured Footballers, Voluntary Choice and Social Goods. A Reply to Corlett
title_full Brain-Injured Footballers, Voluntary Choice and Social Goods. A Reply to Corlett
title_fullStr Brain-Injured Footballers, Voluntary Choice and Social Goods. A Reply to Corlett
title_full_unstemmed Brain-Injured Footballers, Voluntary Choice and Social Goods. A Reply to Corlett
title_sort Brain-Injured Footballers, Voluntary Choice and Social Goods. A Reply to Corlett
author_id_str_mv 85b0b1623e55d977378622a6aab7ee6e
author_id_fullname_str_mv 85b0b1623e55d977378622a6aab7ee6e_***_Michael McNamee
author Michael McNamee
author2 Francisco Javier Lopez Frias
Michael McNamee
format Journal article
container_title Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
container_start_page 1
publishDate 2019
institution Swansea University
issn 1751-1321
1751-133X
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17511321.2019.1583273
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description In this essay, we respond to Angelo Corlett’s criticism of our paper ‘Ethics, Brain Injuries, and Sports: Prohibition, Reform, and Prudence’. To do so, first, we revisit certain assumptions and arguments Corlett makes concerning intercollegiate football and brain injuries in his 2014 paper ‘Should intercollegiate football be eliminated?’. Second, we identify and criticize two key elements in his response regarding (a) ‘luck egalitarianism’, and (b) ‘public goods’. We conclude by reaffirming our critical reading of Corlett’s original 2014 paper and by identifying further elements (i) luck and the nature of individual responsibility; and (ii) the nature of sports as public rather than merely private goods, that he would have to address for his latter 2018 position to hold true.
published_date 2019-12-31T03:59:56Z
_version_ 1763753063109099520
score 10.999547

Similar Items