Journal article 1195 views 390 downloads
Arguing about causes in law: a semi-formal framework for causal arguments
Rūta Liepiņa,
Giovanni Sartor,
Adam Wyner 
Artificial Intelligence and Law, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 69 - 89
Swansea University Author:
Adam Wyner
-
PDF | Accepted Manuscript
Download (318.43KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1007/s10506-019-09246-z
Abstract
In legal argumentation and liability attribution, disputes over causes play a central role. Legal discussions about causation often have difficulty with cause-in-fact in complex situations, e.g. overdetermination, preemption, omission. We first assess three theories of causation. Then we introduce a...
| Published in: | Artificial Intelligence and Law |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0924-8463 1572-8382 |
| Published: |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
2020
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa49685 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract: |
In legal argumentation and liability attribution, disputes over causes play a central role. Legal discussions about causation often have difficulty with cause-in-fact in complex situations, e.g. overdetermination, preemption, omission. We first assess three theories of causation. Then we introduce a semi-formal framework to model causal arguments using both strict and defeasible rules. We apply the framework to the Althen vaccine injury case. Wrapping up the paper, we motivate a causal argumentation framework and propose to integrate current theories of causation. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
Artificial Intelligence, Legal Reasoning, Defeasible Reasoning |
| College: |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
| Issue: |
1 |
| Start Page: |
69 |
| End Page: |
89 |