Journal article 902 views 313 downloads
The AHK-Wales Report Card 2018: Policy Measures - is it possible to ‘score’ qualitative data?
Health Promotion International, Volume: 36, Issue: 4, Pages: 1151 - 1159
Swansea University Authors: Malcolm Ward, Richard P. O. Tyler , Maggie Miller , Gareth Stratton
-
PDF | Accepted Manuscript
Download (910.78KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1093/heapro/daaa118
Abstract
Comprehensive and meaningful policy analysis in the field of physical activity is difficult, not least because of the variable influence of other policy domains. However, in 2011 a Policy Assessment Tool (PAT) was developed by members of the WHO European Network for the Promotion of Health-Enhancing...
Published in: | Health Promotion International |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0957-4824 1460-2245 |
Published: |
Oxford University Press (OUP)
2021
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa55281 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2020-09-30T12:51:53Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2021-09-08T03:17:58Z |
id |
cronfa55281 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2021-09-07T15:08:19.7532610</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>55281</id><entry>2020-09-30</entry><title>The AHK-Wales Report Card 2018: Policy Measures - is it possible to ‘score’ qualitative data?</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>cbd7ce4369275750013f8aecd15863f6</sid><firstname>Malcolm</firstname><surname>Ward</surname><name>Malcolm Ward</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>209f4880cce841e273d7753f6af40e80</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-9756-5582</ORCID><firstname>Richard P. O.</firstname><surname>Tyler</surname><name>Richard P. O. Tyler</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>true</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>44240ce276e4271cebb608f98c8e60ad</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6848-5866</ORCID><firstname>Maggie</firstname><surname>Miller</surname><name>Maggie Miller</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>6d62b2ed126961bed81a94a2beba8a01</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-5618-0803</ORCID><firstname>Gareth</firstname><surname>Stratton</surname><name>Gareth Stratton</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2020-09-30</date><deptcode>FGSEN</deptcode><abstract>Comprehensive and meaningful policy analysis in the field of physical activity is difficult, not least because of the variable influence of other policy domains. However, in 2011 a Policy Assessment Tool (PAT) was developed by members of the WHO European Network for the Promotion of Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA Europe) and tested in several different countries. In 2014, Wales joined a global initiative, active healthy kids (AHK) Global Alliance, that supported the development of country level ‘Report Cards’ scoring a range of indicators that influence physical activity amongst children and young people, one of which was labelled ‘Government Strategies and Investments’. For the first two Report Cards this indicator and its associated ‘score’ was informed subjectively by expert consensus. In 2018, it was decided to utilize the Policy Audit Tool Version 2 (PAT v2) developed by HEPA Europe to aid analysis and to develop and test a scoring rubric aligned to the tool. The subsequent process indicated that the tool could be applied and translated into a ‘grade’ that could be used in conjunction with the other indicators of the AHK Report Card to generate overall Report Card grades. The use of both the HEPA PAT v2 and the scoring rubric offers an opportunity to provide greater consistency and potential for developing both comparative and trend data when assessing policy impact on physical activity in children and young people. These tools should be utilized by the AHK Global Alliance in future Report Cards.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Health Promotion International</journal><volume>36</volume><journalNumber>4</journalNumber><paginationStart>1151</paginationStart><paginationEnd>1159</paginationEnd><publisher>Oxford University Press (OUP)</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0957-4824</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1460-2245</issnElectronic><keywords>physical activity, policy, assessment, active healthy kids</keywords><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>8</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-08-30</publishedDate><doi>10.1093/heapro/daaa118</doi><url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa118</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Science and Engineering - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGSEN</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2021-09-07T15:08:19.7532610</lastEdited><Created>2020-09-30T13:46:33.7335782</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Uncategorised</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Malcolm</firstname><surname>Ward</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Richard P. O.</firstname><surname>Tyler</surname><orcid>0000-0001-9756-5582</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Lowri C</firstname><surname>Edwards</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Maggie</firstname><surname>Miller</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6848-5866</orcid><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Simon</firstname><surname>Williams</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Gareth</firstname><surname>Stratton</surname><orcid>0000-0001-5618-0803</orcid><order>6</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>55281__18279__75182e7ea9b04a709b513a73208f8e29.pdf</filename><originalFilename>AAM.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-09-30T13:51:03.6252866</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>932636</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2021-11-09T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2021-09-07T15:08:19.7532610 v2 55281 2020-09-30 The AHK-Wales Report Card 2018: Policy Measures - is it possible to ‘score’ qualitative data? cbd7ce4369275750013f8aecd15863f6 Malcolm Ward Malcolm Ward true false 209f4880cce841e273d7753f6af40e80 0000-0001-9756-5582 Richard P. O. Tyler Richard P. O. Tyler true true 44240ce276e4271cebb608f98c8e60ad 0000-0001-6848-5866 Maggie Miller Maggie Miller true false 6d62b2ed126961bed81a94a2beba8a01 0000-0001-5618-0803 Gareth Stratton Gareth Stratton true false 2020-09-30 FGSEN Comprehensive and meaningful policy analysis in the field of physical activity is difficult, not least because of the variable influence of other policy domains. However, in 2011 a Policy Assessment Tool (PAT) was developed by members of the WHO European Network for the Promotion of Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA Europe) and tested in several different countries. In 2014, Wales joined a global initiative, active healthy kids (AHK) Global Alliance, that supported the development of country level ‘Report Cards’ scoring a range of indicators that influence physical activity amongst children and young people, one of which was labelled ‘Government Strategies and Investments’. For the first two Report Cards this indicator and its associated ‘score’ was informed subjectively by expert consensus. In 2018, it was decided to utilize the Policy Audit Tool Version 2 (PAT v2) developed by HEPA Europe to aid analysis and to develop and test a scoring rubric aligned to the tool. The subsequent process indicated that the tool could be applied and translated into a ‘grade’ that could be used in conjunction with the other indicators of the AHK Report Card to generate overall Report Card grades. The use of both the HEPA PAT v2 and the scoring rubric offers an opportunity to provide greater consistency and potential for developing both comparative and trend data when assessing policy impact on physical activity in children and young people. These tools should be utilized by the AHK Global Alliance in future Report Cards. Journal Article Health Promotion International 36 4 1151 1159 Oxford University Press (OUP) 0957-4824 1460-2245 physical activity, policy, assessment, active healthy kids 30 8 2021 2021-08-30 10.1093/heapro/daaa118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa118 COLLEGE NANME Science and Engineering - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGSEN Swansea University 2021-09-07T15:08:19.7532610 2020-09-30T13:46:33.7335782 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Uncategorised Malcolm Ward 1 Richard P. O. Tyler 0000-0001-9756-5582 2 Lowri C Edwards 3 Maggie Miller 0000-0001-6848-5866 4 Simon Williams 5 Gareth Stratton 0000-0001-5618-0803 6 55281__18279__75182e7ea9b04a709b513a73208f8e29.pdf AAM.pdf 2020-09-30T13:51:03.6252866 Output 932636 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2021-11-09T00:00:00.0000000 true eng |
title |
The AHK-Wales Report Card 2018: Policy Measures - is it possible to ‘score’ qualitative data? |
spellingShingle |
The AHK-Wales Report Card 2018: Policy Measures - is it possible to ‘score’ qualitative data? Malcolm Ward Richard P. O. Tyler Maggie Miller Gareth Stratton |
title_short |
The AHK-Wales Report Card 2018: Policy Measures - is it possible to ‘score’ qualitative data? |
title_full |
The AHK-Wales Report Card 2018: Policy Measures - is it possible to ‘score’ qualitative data? |
title_fullStr |
The AHK-Wales Report Card 2018: Policy Measures - is it possible to ‘score’ qualitative data? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The AHK-Wales Report Card 2018: Policy Measures - is it possible to ‘score’ qualitative data? |
title_sort |
The AHK-Wales Report Card 2018: Policy Measures - is it possible to ‘score’ qualitative data? |
author_id_str_mv |
cbd7ce4369275750013f8aecd15863f6 209f4880cce841e273d7753f6af40e80 44240ce276e4271cebb608f98c8e60ad 6d62b2ed126961bed81a94a2beba8a01 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
cbd7ce4369275750013f8aecd15863f6_***_Malcolm Ward 209f4880cce841e273d7753f6af40e80_***_Richard P. O. Tyler 44240ce276e4271cebb608f98c8e60ad_***_Maggie Miller 6d62b2ed126961bed81a94a2beba8a01_***_Gareth Stratton |
author |
Malcolm Ward Richard P. O. Tyler Maggie Miller Gareth Stratton |
author2 |
Malcolm Ward Richard P. O. Tyler Lowri C Edwards Maggie Miller Simon Williams Gareth Stratton |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Health Promotion International |
container_volume |
36 |
container_issue |
4 |
container_start_page |
1151 |
publishDate |
2021 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0957-4824 1460-2245 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1093/heapro/daaa118 |
publisher |
Oxford University Press (OUP) |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Uncategorised{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Uncategorised |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa118 |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Comprehensive and meaningful policy analysis in the field of physical activity is difficult, not least because of the variable influence of other policy domains. However, in 2011 a Policy Assessment Tool (PAT) was developed by members of the WHO European Network for the Promotion of Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA Europe) and tested in several different countries. In 2014, Wales joined a global initiative, active healthy kids (AHK) Global Alliance, that supported the development of country level ‘Report Cards’ scoring a range of indicators that influence physical activity amongst children and young people, one of which was labelled ‘Government Strategies and Investments’. For the first two Report Cards this indicator and its associated ‘score’ was informed subjectively by expert consensus. In 2018, it was decided to utilize the Policy Audit Tool Version 2 (PAT v2) developed by HEPA Europe to aid analysis and to develop and test a scoring rubric aligned to the tool. The subsequent process indicated that the tool could be applied and translated into a ‘grade’ that could be used in conjunction with the other indicators of the AHK Report Card to generate overall Report Card grades. The use of both the HEPA PAT v2 and the scoring rubric offers an opportunity to provide greater consistency and potential for developing both comparative and trend data when assessing policy impact on physical activity in children and young people. These tools should be utilized by the AHK Global Alliance in future Report Cards. |
published_date |
2021-08-30T04:09:23Z |
_version_ |
1763753657405276160 |
score |
11.035414 |